If anyone has the injector data for either of these injectors, I would appreciate it! The Bosch injectors flow 850cc at 3 bar, and the FAST injectors flow 825cc at 4 bar.
Printable View
If anyone has the injector data for either of these injectors, I would appreciate it! The Bosch injectors flow 850cc at 3 bar, and the FAST injectors flow 825cc at 4 bar.
anyone have a tune with fast 85 injectors to view??
scale it manual with the unit conversion
Vette C6Quote:
Originally Posted by vette_c6
I like your signature, though in my case I would put "stop raping your MAF and IFR tables!" I've seen some jigsaw puzzles more than quite a few times in those 2 areas.
hehhehhehe ,,, with raping it ,, you can run it ,, but when you fix it you will get always more power ,, less injector duty cycle
i used to be PE raper :P! but not anymore ,,
this is a pic a car i tuned ,, was raping the fuel ,, look at the injectors
same car with hotter weather when Bob morreale came to me ,, he showed me the differents
:cheers:
Ok riddle me this riddle me that, I know the data doesn't exist, so I'm curious about how I did my IFR table. It has a return style fuel system (A&A), so I made the IFR one flat number. Should I have made it a linear table like stock? I am having some start up issues. Everything else on the car is great, just having a lean start up issue.
If u are running on ur maf
U can just rich it by the maf
U dont need to mess up with everything
And for setting all ur injector number as only 1 number
For example
55 55 55 55 ... 55
Its not wrong
But u always have to have ur resons if someone will look at ur tune
Good luck
I appreciate your willingness to help, but that's not really the answer I was looking for.
If the regulator is vacuum referenced, make it all the same number.Quote:
Originally Posted by FastEddy
I called FIC this morning and John was happy to send me the excel spread sheet on these injectors. So problem solved.
Too bad it's ripped off data from ID. Lol. Hacks.
Ha, ironically they told me it was the other way around.... and I didn't even ask! lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DSteck
Sounds like the whole "HP Tuners hacked LS1 Edit" claim carputing used to always make. That's why the first release of LS2 Edit was locking ECM's, because they didn't want it to happen again lol
Ask FIC about the cease and desist letter they were served back in December.
Ask for pictures of their bench test setup or how the data's even gathered. ID will readily provide anything.
This is just their break in rig. 30 minutes of varied operating conditions and pulse widths with actual gasoline, just to break them in before actual testing.
http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...w/13fa37aa.jpg
http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...w/4ab150c7.jpg
http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...w/d2ca8637.jpg
http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...w/dd8a4e8d.jpg
And just because I like to stir the pot...
Original ID1000 data sheet: http://www.injectordynamics.com/ID10...03-23-2011.xls
Funny screen shots:
http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...w/9a1c6faa.jpg
http://i813.photobucket.com/albums/z...w/d24dfcd3.jpg
Kinda odd how the FIC data sheet talks about a scaling article with no link, isn't it? Oddly familiar format... Just look at the revision history too. Paul Yaw is the guy who ultimately developed the data.
I never said I had any reason to doubt you. Nor do I really care to get involved in all the dramatics.
Apparently you do, Chuck. Lol. Slander would imply it isn't true, btw.Quote:
Originally Posted by FastEddy