6R80 Adaptive Slip Table Axis Labels

Is it just me, or are the axis labels for the tables in Auto Shift Properties > Adaptive not defined for anyone? I have attached an image to show what I am looking at. My car is a 2014 Mustang GT 6R80 and I am looking at the stock tune I pulled from the car, strategy FSFD1A5. Maybe I am just missing something since I am very new at this, but no tune I have opened has the axis labels for these tables defined and I have seen plenty of tunes that have changes made in these tables. I am running the latest 2.25 beta, which is 2.25.2322 as of today, and I update to the latest at least weekly.

Thanks for any insight on this.

Attachment 52712

mine arent defined either on the f150 application

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 02reaper

mine arent defined either on the f150 application

---

Any idea what the X and Y axis labels would be. I see all kinds of tunes, like the Roush tunes, have these adjusted all over the place. Would like to know what each row and column is before I go in and start making changes.

Thanks.

The X and Y axis for these tables are handled differently than the standard way that Ford does them, and our current editor does not support this method, though I have asked for it to be added in a future version.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners

The X and Y axis for these tables are handled differently than the standard way that Ford does them, and our current editor does not support this method, though I have asked for it to be added in a future version.

---

Thanks for chiming in on this Eric. Can you give a little detail on how they are handled? Like I said, I am very new at this and I am trying to learn. I have a pretty good idea of what these tables do, just want to know what is actually going on.

Thanks.

I don't see that this has ever been added but it seems to be important to trans tuning. Any news on this? I'm using beta 3.7 and there are no X and Y axis values yet...

Switched to VCM Suite 4 and this is still not fixed - I had high hopes...

Bumping this. Does anyone know what the axis for these tables are yet. I find it hard to believe that no one knows!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blackbolt22

Bumping this. Does anyone know what the axis for these tables are yet. I find it hard to believe that no one knows!

---

I don't know exactly how the axis are laid out but i know changing them on the lower or right of the table seemed to work for higher load/RPM or pressure or a combo of all three. The middle of the table seemed to come into affect during very light throttle areas also. It could be going left to right or top to bottom though as well. I'm playing with it as we speak i'll know more in a week.

Some say it's oil temp vs rpm some say it's torque vs rpm but that doesn't bother me at all.

What bothers me it's been like that for a 10 years...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by veeefour

Some say it's oil temp vs rpm some say it's torque vs rpm but that doesn't bother me at all.

What bothers me it's been like that for a 10 years...

---

I agree this is something that should have been taken care of by now. I wish i could at least log trans pressure, or any of the solenoid pressures for that matter. I'm throwing darts blindfolded here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JaegerWrenching

I agree this is something that should have been taken care of by now. I wish i could at least log trans pressure, or any of the solenoid pressures for that matter. I'm throwing darts blindfolded here.

---

6r80 has no pressure sensors - it's inferred.

Ford is inferring the world - I wan't to see inferred spark advance next..it should be there but...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by veeefour

6r80 has no pressure sensors - it's inferred.

Ford is inferring the world - I wan't to see inferred spark advance next..it should be there but...

---

Well if you know your fluids temp and its specific properties you can infer its flow/pressure pretty accurately. But I think it's stupid to do it on a trans where it's based on a solenoids current/amperage. What if that solenoid is going bad or is bad...... I just saw a guy post on the diesel forums who just had his third valve body replaced and is still having issues, that should tell you something about this inferred data and how well it works for diagnosing issues lol.

Does not need to go bad - oh no no just fill it improperly like 2-3mm off and you are already in trouble...

Fuel pressure, EGT, MAP, engine oil temp, trans line pressure, barro - waiting for them to remove knock sensors feck it should be OK with those 60 tables right...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by veeefour

Does not need to go bad - oh no no just fill it improperly like 2-3mm off and you are already in trouble...

Fuel pressure, EGT, MAP, engine oil temp, trans line pressure, barro - waiting for them to remove knock sensors feck it should be OK with those 60 tables right...

---

I actually recently dealt with that exact issue, my 6r140 was low on fluid straight from ford. I was chasing my tail and couldn't see anything wrong with the tune, i kept making changes and it was good for a little and randomly not. I thought it's gotta be in the adaptive's, because after flashing when warm it wouldn't do it right away. This is because the level would rise enough to act normal when warm. The night i figured it out i was on my way home leaving a family members house on a hilly road and noticed, It would only slip when it was cold and going up a hill. Checked the level the next day and it was barley on the bottom of the dip stick. I'm currently about to see if ford will warranty, it if not i will buy a upgraded GPZ clutch pack and rebuild it myself.

6r140 is a heavy turd to work with - taking that center section out of case will give you some cancer LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners

The X and Y axis for these tables are handled differently than the standard way that Ford does them, and our current editor does not support this method, though I have asked for it to be added in a future version.

---

Eric - is it even possible?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by veeefour

6r140 is a heavy turd to work with - taking that center section out of case will give you some cancer LOL

---

Lol yes it is and i'm always excited to work on one! Not...... lol, I wish i could log turbine speed and current gear ratio on the 17+ trucks like the 16 and older so i could see if it is slipping or not. Since i've filled the trans it's been acting very normal but i can't take that as not slipping at all.

times like this I am LOOOOVING my Quick6 controller.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sportinawoody

times like this I am LOOOOVING my Quick6 controller.

---

That's only a viable solution for a personal setup IMO. If you tune cars frequently it's not a financially reasonable solution.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eric@HPTuners

The X and Y axis for these tables are handled differently than the standard way that Ford does them, and our current editor does not support this method, though I have asked for it to be added in a future version.

---

6 years later and on 4.11 guess it didnt make the list

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by h41ry

6 years later and on 4.11 guess it didnt make the list

---

like 1000 other things they promised...vide trans brake...but hey, you can tune 1.0 ecobust instead...

Who has support tickets in for this?

Thing is ford doesn't even label them in the A2Ls

Attachment 112320

They will never be defined, but this question keeps being asked at least two or three times a year since the thread was started back in 2015.

here's an idea, how about just letting us populate the tables. As in being able to click either to the left or above the table, then fill in the empty boxes as we please. Engine torque down the side and engine RPM's across the top like it should be. Seems like that would solve the problem and we would all be happy about this then. Been how many years now since this was brought up ? :)

Update for anyone that still follows this, I switched to PCMTec last year, and even they have no definitions for Y or X .