Thanks for the advice GHuggins I?ll give this ago tonight. This I how I was tuning it then I finally put my WB in so I changed to open loop expecting it to be easier and more accurate
Type: Posts; User: bjl1990
Thanks for the advice GHuggins I?ll give this ago tonight. This I how I was tuning it then I finally put my WB in so I changed to open loop expecting it to be easier and more accurate
ok i got a couple of logs this morning and if attached the sh#t show of a tune file go easy on me fellas
116070116071116072
I knew the PE table was a multiplier and obviously all the multiplier tables I wasn?t aware that the OL tables were that could be where I?m going wrong.
This is my first gm tune I have mainly...
It was originally set to 1.0 and it was still commanding 1.02-1.05 or leaner I set it to .95 to try to get it safe enough to continue with tuning the volumetric efficiency
Open loop tables for gas and alcohol are all set to .95 I cant figure out why my commanded lambda is ranging from 1.02 to 1.05 the longer it runs the leaner it commands! Wb reading starts at .96 and...
JasonHSV that doesn?t help with the crazy injector pulse width being logged.
I believe the car has a fuel pressure issue hence the lean out up top
Have a BA N/A with FG N/A injectors and manifold. On vcm scanner injector pulse width is 700m/s!!! at idle and top out at 845m/s
I have all fg injector scales, car idles and drive fine fuel...