The 2013 ECM/TCM are expecting the other modules to be at different addresses than where they are in a 2019.
Type: Posts; User: blindsquirrel
The 2013 ECM/TCM are expecting the other modules to be at different addresses than where they are in a 2019.
When did this start? Because there is a ton of stuff in the change log going back quite a long while.
I'd check for U codes in every module, if there are two modules the rest of the system can't talk to it's possible it's something like a devID conflict since there's such a spread between the year...
Opening the .xml will append all the graphs to the bottom of whatever you have there now, you may just not be seeing them. It won't replace the ones you already have there.
145231
That's a bunch of random stuff in there too, delete the ones not relevant. There's one for VE with no filters, then two others with different filter strings for different stuff.
I have...
It's still having to add around 20% almost everywhere, now it needs to be tuned. Be real careful with hammering on it until then, since that 20% being added by the trims goes away once it goes into...
There's also something funky in (some of?) the GMPP fan controls, they will run relay fans but not anything variable speed.
Main issue here is, the new ECM still has the 3.6L OS in it, trying to run LS V8 hardware.
A tuning device that happens to include rather limited scantool functions is the wrong tool for the job, if what you're looking for is a scantool.
See, they tell you 'just report the spam, we'll take care of it' and you report it and 3 days later it's still here.
There is a poorly-hidden link in the signature line. This link was included in...
How is anybody else supposed to be any less stumped than you are when we not only can't lay hands on the actual vehicle, but can't even see a log file of it doing the things you say it does?
THIS IS A TEST, ONLY A TEST...
I think they gave you a base file with totally jacked-up Open Loop and Open Loop Gains tables. These trucks with this OS originally had a 10.00 x 0.1 = 1.00 setup;...
The combo itself didn't scare anybody away; lack of info about how it's set up did. Fuel pressure is...? I still don't know that one. Lots of confusion around how you're describing the fuel...
p.s. Good luck with no cats or downstream O2s, but the lightoff spark tables still populated and Cat Test/Post O2 Test still enabled. I'm sure disabling that stuff is just yet another scam THEY want...
You're right, I'm just making shit up. To prove that all you have to do is fill the VVE with random numbers, or all zeroes. It'll still run great. All these high-falutin' VVE tuning methods are just...
And you think that's going to be productive? (it's not)
My very first impression is: completely untouched VVE and 'MAF only', plus a tight LSA cam with lots of overlap? Sure you wanna keep going that direction?
Other very very basic Electrical 101 things to check: What is the voltage at the battery +/- terminals while the starter is cranking the engine? What is the voltage between starter B+ post/ground...
Here would be a quick test to give a yes/no on the 'starter sucks up too much voltage' hypothesis: Disconnect the trigger wire from the starter solenoid. Start the scanner. Turn key to CRANK. Does...
I imagine there might be different results depending on whether it's just temporarily failed for tuning or totally permanently removed.
SD does not need a MAF sensor at all, but that's not what he's talking about. The MAF has to be 'failed' with certain settings in the file to force it to ignore the MAF, only while collecting the...
...or maybe your DLC pin 16 is powered by an IGN feed that is hot in RUN but not CRANK. Nobody knows what you're working with here, a swap vehicle with non-stock wiring or an as-built factory...
Either there's a fault with your particular example of that starter (not a problem with that part number itself), or, you have a voltage drop issue (more likely). If you don't know how to test...
Same behavior here, you aren't doing anything wrong.
P0102/P0103 are the ones that trigger SD, not P0101.