Are you using Bluecat's EQ VE Tool or HP Tuners VVE in beta v2.25 for VE Tuning?
Type: Posts; User: dcpatters
Are you using Bluecat's EQ VE Tool or HP Tuners VVE in beta v2.25 for VE Tuning?
I don't think so; just tried and it worked. I've got the zip file, can email if you like.
So to tweak an E38, Closed Loop Proportional --> Airflow Mode and Close Loop Integrator Delay --> Airflow Mode
I went back to Bluecats tool. For some reason with the beta VVE tuning, I was chasing AFR Error %/all over the place. I used a sample BVE with similar cam specs and went from there.
If we didn't have VVE in the latest beta, I would recommend Bluecat's tool, however, it's not so intuitive. You'll need to read up on it a bit. Don't get me wrong, it works and when I used it sent...
Do you have histogram filters in place for deceleration and stuff like that?
52076
Details from attached cam card and what tuner supplied. I tried going the other way ~140, but the motor did not like it.
Here's what I've got
52072
It's working now. Just downloaded the latest release. :yay:
I believe this is what Dave mentions in post 101
http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?41350-How-is-injector-timing-calculated/page6
Yes, I do. From my understanding typical with that much overlap. Not sure of a fix; but could run OL, maybe a hybrid type in lower RPM ranges?
Are you increasing the Normal ECT values or reducing them?
As a tuning shop and dyno operator, that must be a huge pain in the ass.
RussK set mine to 90. Motor feels better, idles smoother, albeit has 15* of overlap.
But I agree, I have read so many theories.
Cheers. I'll leave it as is once coefficients are calculated.
Duration @ .006 283 301
.050 INT: 8 BTDC 44 ABDC EXH: 62 BBDC 6 ATDC
Duration @ .050 233 248
Lobe Separation 113
One question about the VVE, once you copy and paste your error offset into each VE and generate coefficients, is it necessary to smooth the table?
I've got mine at ~90 in the higher temps.
200 is the calculation used to subtract from the Injection Timing boundry table, 520-200 = EOIT target (320)?
I did both, the LS is not a 2 staged manifold.
It's been broken. Right after the editor crash was fixed for file compare.
I am, no issues to report.
Is COT enabled? Not on a laptop to view tune.
Isn't that what I mentioned?
There's a later version, 4.2.2. Also, I found similar behaviour, I copied only one table at at time, e.g. open table, copy row data, then close table, repeat for the remaining tables.
...