Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: MAF tuning

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27

    MAF tuning

    I have a 2004 LQ4 block with PRC 2.5 heads, 228/232 112r cam, Long tubes, and 48lb injectors. I have the VE table dialed in pretty close and am happy with it but am having some problems going forward into MAF tuning and then into closed loop and all.

    I have taken my VE tune and changed everything (so I think) over for MAF tuning and the car starts and idles fine (a little lean) but whenever I give her any gas she misfires and runs extremely lean (WB02 pegs out at 22 AFR). I dont know if im missing a setting or if my MAF settings are that far off. I figured I would be better off asking for help before going forward.

    Attached is my current VE tune that I am running and then my MAF tune. My VE tune is obviously not in closed loop as I dont have my MAF worked out, but that is my goal.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Datsun 280z rocket bunny wide body build, LQ4 iron block, PRC heads 9.8/1 compression, 228/232 112lsa TSP Cam, trunnion upgrade, Delphi 12613412 injectors, 7/8in long tube headers, 78mm intake typhoon intake, stock TB, duel 3in exhaust.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,466
    This in the car that is in your signature?

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Posts
    475
    This file should give you a better start. That ve is rough and unrealistic, this should be a decent starting point.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  4. #4
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27
    @ gtstorey - Yes, it is in my 77 Datsun 280z.

    @ 04silverado 6.0 - I assume you mean my MAF table is unrealistic? My VE table is tuned based on my WB O2 sensor and is dead on 14.2 all the way up to 6k rpm.
    Datsun 280z rocket bunny wide body build, LQ4 iron block, PRC heads 9.8/1 compression, 228/232 112lsa TSP Cam, trunnion upgrade, Delphi 12613412 injectors, 7/8in long tube headers, 78mm intake typhoon intake, stock TB, duel 3in exhaust.

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,466
    If you aren’t running a factory intake setup, you shouldn’t expect any factory maf numbers to be anywhere close.

  6. #6
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,648
    It's quite common for an aftermarket DIY-installed wideband to give readings that are offset from reality.

  7. #7
    Blindsquirrel gets a virtual like..

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Walkerbk View Post
    @ gtstorey - Yes, it is in my 77 Datsun 280z.

    @ 04silverado 6.0 - I assume you mean my MAF table is unrealistic? My VE table is tuned based on my WB O2 sensor and is dead on 14.2 all the way up to 6k rpm.
    No, he means your VE table is completely unrealistic. The only way you are getting fueling anywhere near correct is if your injector flow rate is way off. If you put real numbers in a MAF table with your fuel that far off, of course it is going dead lean. You need to check your fuel pressure. If it is correct at 58psi, then you don't have the right injector data. The best race engines in the world could not hit close to the VE numbers you have in that table without forced induction.

  9. #9
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27
    @gametech - Im not sure where my flow rates are off if that is the case. I did fight a bad set of injectors until about 4 months ago when I bought the Delphi 12613412 injectors from the guy blind squirrel recommends. That helped tremendously. I do however agree that it is still off some how. Fuel pressure is right at 58psi and I'm running a corvette fuel filter/ regulator with a returnless system.
    Datsun 280z rocket bunny wide body build, LQ4 iron block, PRC heads 9.8/1 compression, 228/232 112lsa TSP Cam, trunnion upgrade, Delphi 12613412 injectors, 7/8in long tube headers, 78mm intake typhoon intake, stock TB, duel 3in exhaust.

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,945
    Tune it in CL.

  11. #11
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,648
    What fuel pump? Any bigger than 255lph, or a store brand filter-reg with any pump any bigger than stock flow rate, and you will have problems.

    Have you verified fuel pressure under load, like in the areas where your VE is showing the crazy high numbers?

    Have you run it in closed loop and made sure the wideband agrees with the narrowbands?

  12. #12
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27
    @blindsquirrel - 2002 camaro stock pump (for the ls1). I might upgrade to a 255 in the near future. It is plumbed with 6an soft lines and 3/8in hard line.

    My fuel pressure gauge is on my fuel rail so I haven't been able to verify but I am looking at where else I could mount another gauge on my dash.

    I haven't ran in closed loop. I didn't think I could run in closed loop with just the ve table.

    Please forgive my ignorance, I have done everything else on this car from building the transmission to paint and body. I'm still reading as much as I can on tuning.

  13. #13
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,648
    You need a fuel pressure gauge that's used for diagnostics, not a chrome polished billet aluminum decoration. If you are working on fuel injection you need a gauge that lives in a nice blow-molded case until you need it, with a hose long enough that you can snake it up under the rear of the hood and see it from the seat while driving. It's as essential a tool as wire crimpers and a voltmeter and a scan tool. A rail mounted gauge is useless for anything but showing people who don't know any better how cool you are.