Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: anybody have a stock bin for 2000 GP GTP?

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686

    anybody have a stock bin for 2000 GP GTP?

    I'm sure 99-2003 will work too for what I need it for.
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner devildog9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Niagara Falls, NY, USA
    Posts
    354
    Merry Xmas. 2 different OS ID's.
    Regal GS Site Owner / HPT Moderator / FTV6 Mod

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    thanks, is there something I should know about OS id's?
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  4. #4
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,279
    Only the one meant for your vin will work, and GM did several, in some cases nearly a dozen OS's per vin #.
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    Do you know how many other OS' there are for the 2000 year? I never heard this discussed on the Powrtuner website before, so this is news to me.
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  6. #6
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,279
    probably 20+
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    thats odd MY stock a/f tps vs % table has values of 1 for 0-25%. The file you sent me has 0's across the board, I wonder why there is a difference.

    Since this is a table I'm not familiar with I'm wondering what you guys have yours set at?
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  8. #8
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    That is odd.. Usually only the 04+ GTPs have that table zeroed out stock.

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    hey devildog, I looked at the ve table on the second file you gave me and it doesn't look stock. Can you clear this up for me?
    Last edited by GPGTP; 12-26-2007 at 01:17 AM.
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  10. #10
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    Hmm. The first one results in "Definition failed to load" when trying to open it. The second, it opens. After looking at it, I can tell you why the stock "a/f tps vs % table" looks odd (all zeros). It appears to be a GT calibration vs GTP.

  11. #11
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    Quote Originally Posted by GPGTP
    thats odd MY stock a/f tps vs % table has values of 1 for 0-25%. The file you sent me has 0's across the board, I wonder why there is a difference.

    Since this is a table I'm not familiar with I'm wondering what you guys have yours set at?
    The PE Fuel Adder vs. TPS table should be set to 0. Note that values greater than 0 add to the AFR (leaner).

    Russ Kemp

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ K
    The PE Fuel Adder vs. TPS table should be set to 0. Note that values greater than 0 add to the AFR (leaner).

    Russ Kemp

    True, and Stock GTs have all zeroes from 97-03.. If you set it to all zeroes on a GTP, you can end up with some realllly rich low throttle PE.

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    No reason to lean the commanded PE with that table, just set the Base AFR vs ECT table to were you want it. Then also 0 the Add vs. RPM table. Now tune the Maf table to get the actual AFR to match the commanded.

    Russ Kemp

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner devildog9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Niagara Falls, NY, USA
    Posts
    354
    Quote Originally Posted by GPGTP
    hey devildog, I looked at the ve table on the second file you gave me and it doesn't look stock. Can you clear this up for me?
    I read it directly off of a stock gtp... right before we put it in the crusher.
    Regal GS Site Owner / HPT Moderator / FTV6 Mod

  15. #15
    Advanced Tuner devildog9999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Niagara Falls, NY, USA
    Posts
    354
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ K
    No reason to lean the commanded PE with that table, just set the Base AFR vs ECT table to were you want it. Then also 0 the Add vs. RPM table. Now tune the Maf table to get the actual AFR to match the commanded.

    Russ Kemp
    I agree as well. I only use that table for VERY fine tuning (leaning) under low throttle, otherwise zero it out.
    Regal GS Site Owner / HPT Moderator / FTV6 Mod

  16. #16
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    Ok, I see. I prefer to use my VE table to make large adjustments apposed to the maf. It seems my car does use the ve table, but I'll confirm it 100%.

    BTW I had the same problem with the first file.
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85

  17. #17
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by GPGTP
    Do you know how many other OS' there are for the 2000 year? I never heard this discussed on the Powrtuner website before, so this is news to me.
    If you still have your old PT program, you can turn out a stock bin in about 4 seconds! The OSID will be the one that matches your car and the HPT will be able to load it properly if the OSIDs are the ones registered to your car.
    '99 Black GTP Sedan
    3.4-2.6" PB Quick Change pulleys, Custom CAI, XP Cam, N* TB, LQ4 MAF, SLP headers, 42.5# Injectors, 180/195* thermostat.

    13.501 @ 103.392 on 91 (2.4 60-foot).
    13.82 @ 105.28 on 87 octane! (2.42 60-foot).
    263kph top end as shown on the GPS.
    All this and 39MPG to boot. What more can a man ask for?
    * Just another enthusiastic amateur tuner! *

  18. #18
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    686
    OMG, dude you are right, I just never made the connection.
    2018 Camaro SS, Maggie 2650, 103 TB, Big Gulp, E85