Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Staying out of PE when tuning MAF

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    21

    Staying out of PE when tuning MAF

    I think I am confusing myself here.

    When tuning MAF, I should stay out of PE correct? But, will I hit the highest frequencies of the MAF table if I do not go WOT?

    I commanded 1.13 in PE at 75% TPS.

    I am tuning with a wideband, disabled LTFT STFT, COT, DFCO, OLCL EQ ratio of 1 above 158F....

    Just thinking to far into it. Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    when tuning with a WB, you should cover from idle to your rev limiter and everything in between. The people trying to stay out of PE are making a half ass attempt at tuning with the narrowbands. Works OK but you aren't doing a good job calibrating the whole curve correctly.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    As mentioned above the only time you want to stay out of PE is when tuning with fuel trims. When WB tuning just disable closed loop and tune everything using AFR Error.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  4. #4
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    21
    Thanks guys. that's what I thought. Should I keep the OLCL EQ ratio at 1.00 after 158 degrees after tuning too? Russ helped me in the past with my car when I was getting started and he left the ratio 1.00. IMO, that would make for a nice and smooth running car since you are commanding 14.7:1 until PE, correct???

  5. #5
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    That is only if you are in open loop though, but yea, you can leave it.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  6. #6
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    109
    so if you are tuning using stft's is it best to disable pe until you are done with the ve and maf tables?

  7. #7
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    never disable PE, you need that fuel
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  8. #8
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    109
    Ok then, I see that most tuning guides say to stay out of pe. So what is the best way to make sure I don't get into pe? It seems it would be impossible to hit certain cells without going over a certain throttle % thus entering pe mode...

  9. #9
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    which is why using a wideband is preferred.

    You can set the PE enable map to something like 70-80 kPa to help, but you still will not have any good numbers for WOT/PE which is where it is needed the most.
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner 5_Liter_Eater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,968
    Accept that you cannot tune WOT/PE with fuel trims and leave PE engagement alone. If your fuel trim tuning set a plot filter to filter out any PE data from your histograms. I dont have the software in front of me but set the plot filter to only show data when commanded AFR >14.6. Then you don't have to worry about entering PE when fuel trim tuning.
    Bill Winters

    Former owner/builder/tuner of the FarmVette
    Out of the LSx tuning game

  11. #11
    Senior Tuner Frost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Richmond VA
    Posts
    1,950
    Quote Originally Posted by redgto4u
    Ok then, I see that most tuning guides say to stay out of pe. So what is the best way to make sure I don't get into pe? It seems it would be impossible to hit certain cells without going over a certain throttle % thus entering pe mode...

    the guides say that because NBs and trims are completely useless for WOT.

    HPT should push a bundled wideband with the suite...
    Steve Williams
    TunedbyFrost.com


  12. #12
    I think that EC_Tune has posted some of this configs in the sticky that already have the filters for discarding the PE results from your scan if you don't want to go through the trouble of putting the string in yourself.

  13. #13
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    in the end, it is still a half ass way to do it. If you want to do it right then tune it all with a WB
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
    in the end, it is still a half ass way to do it. If you want to do it right then tune it all with a WB
    Better than not doing it all, I suppose.

    ...however, not doing it and doing it half-assed will get you about the same results!

    I agree. From my personal experience, when I was going my driveability with STFT, I had far more work to do smoothing the VE table. I started over with a WB and doing AFR % Error the VE table moved into line more quickly and with less smoothing required. Perhaps I just got lucky, but it seemed to go far more quickly with the WB.

  15. #15
    Tuning Addict WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    8,093
    but the most critical parts (WOT) are still not done, but I still get your point
    Sulski Performance Tuning
    2000 WS6 M6 - LS6 (long block, refreshed top end), 10.8:1 CR, 90 mm ported FAST, Exo-Skel, 227/232 cam, QTP HVMC, EWP, GMMG, 9" w/4.11s
    2018 Sierra SLT 5.3L A8 - Airaid intake tube, GM Borla catback, L86 Intake/Ported TB