Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: force motor current vs commanded line pressure

  1. #1

    force motor current vs commanded line pressure

    This table is really weird. Both 0% and 100% cells are 0. How can that be? Then from 6% to 96% it goes down from about 900s in the 6% column to 100s in the 96% column. So the middle looks ok, but I'm confused about the 0 columns at 0% and 100%. What does that mean and should I fix it?

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Santa Clarita, Ca
    Posts
    962

    Re: force motor current vs commanded line pressure

    When vehicle/year/Operating System ID are you tuning?


    Ken

  3. #3

    Re: force motor current vs commanded line pressure

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken@HPTuners
    When vehicle/year/Operating System ID are you tuning?


    Ken

    96 camaro 3.8 w/97 PCM
    OS: 16245315

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Santa Clarita, Ca
    Posts
    962

    Re: force motor current vs commanded line pressure

    Dom,

    I looked at a calibration I have and it does not look like that. While the 0 in the 100% column will give you max line pressure, I would raise it a little if you plan on running it up there by raising your shift pressures and max line pressure.

    I assume the calibration you are using has not been modified by some other "tuner" or software?

    Your stock table should look like this:

    [tt]1074 879 879 879 835 796 757 718 698 615 596 537 479 420 337 220 220 0
    1074 918 898 879 835 796 757 718 679 640 576 537 459 420 337 220 220 0
    1074 918 898 879 835 796 776 737 698 640 596 537 479 420 356 259 259 0
    1074 918 898 879 938 796 776 737 698 640 596 537 479 420 356 239 239 0
    1074 938 898 879 835 796 757 718 679 640 576 537 459 420 337 220 220 0
    1074 938 898 879 835 796 757 718 679 615 576 518 459 400 317 200 200 0
    1074 938 898 854 815 796 757 718 679 615 576 518 439 400 298 181 181 0
    1074 918 898 854 815 776 757 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 298 161 161 0
    1074 918 898 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 298 142 142 0
    1074 918 898 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 298 142 142 0
    1074 918 898 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 278 142 142 0
    1074 918 879 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 278 142 142 0
    1074 918 879 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 278 142 142 0
    1074 918 879 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 278 142 142 0
    1074 918 879 854 815 776 737 698 659 615 557 498 439 381 278 142 142 0
    1074 918 879 835 815 776 737 698 659 596 557 498 439 381 278 142 142 0
    1074 918 879 835 815 776 737 698 659 596 557 498 439 381 278 117 117 0
    [/tt]


    Email me your calibration so I can take a look at it.

    Thanks!
    Ken

  5. #5

    Re: force motor current vs commanded line pressure

    Ok, I don't know what happened between my editing sessions. I never zeroed out that column and the original looks just like yours, but my recent ones are zeroed out. That would explain the hard shifts. hehe I fixed it now how it should be. Thanks for the help.