Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: HP Tuners Accuracy

  1. #1
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    59

    HP Tuners Accuracy

    I know on older cars the stock tach's are generally off in the upper rpm's. Is it still the same on alot of newer ones as well. I have an 06 GTO 6 speed (no motor mods) and figured the tach would read kinda close.

    But when I log runs at the track, there is anywhere between a 300 to 500 rpm difference in what I think I am shifting the car at and what the logs show I shifted at.

    Even trying to bring the rpms up at the line to launch consistantly, what I thought was 3000 showed on the log to be more.

    Just wondering what others have noticed.........

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,579
    The dash tach has a damper in the signal it recieves, so it will show lower rpms then actual. It is like a fial safe system to prevent the driver/owner from over revving the engine (supposedly). The ECM uses the crank signal for instantaneous rpm, so the scanner will report that value. I would trust the scanner over the dash tach. It is standard across the board for all GM makes.

  3. #3
    Tuner boomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Peoria, AZ
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by 12secSS View Post
    The dash tach has a damper in the signal it recieves, so it will show lower rpms then actual. It is like a fial safe system to prevent the driver/owner from over revving the engine (supposedly).
    that makes sense, but wouldn't it have to be the other way around? make the driver think they are reving higher than they actually are.
    Photos
    320 rwhp/340 ft-lb
    1/4 mile: 13.33 @ 105 mph

  4. #4
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by boomer View Post
    that makes sense, but wouldn't it have to be the other way around? make the driver think they are reving higher than they actually are.
    Thats what i was thinking, would make a better fail safe the other way around.


    Thanks, I figured the scanner was accurate.

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,579
    I have seen it both ways, mainly the first, so it is not set in stone. The point is that the dash rpm is not accurate at all.

  6. #6
    Tuner boomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Peoria, AZ
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by 12secSS View Post
    I have seen it both ways, mainly the first, so it is not set in stone. The point is that the dash rpm is not accurate at all.
    i'll have to pay closer attention next time i'm logging. id like to see how my tach compares.
    Photos
    320 rwhp/340 ft-lb
    1/4 mile: 13.33 @ 105 mph

  7. #7
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Macomb Township, MI
    Posts
    100
    If there is a 500RPM discrepency on LAUNCH IE brake stalling it there is something wrong there. The GTO cluster is actually one of the more accurate clusters out there. I'd be suprised to see that much at such a steady state.
    Chris White
    www.GTOShiftLight.com
    2006 GTO Spice Red A4
    2012 Jeep SRT8
    2013 SRX Custom IPC/BCM/CUE
    2013 XTS4 Custom IPC/BCM/CUE Auto High Beams
    2013 Volt Custom IPC/BCM/Radio

  8. #8
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    59
    Quote Originally Posted by GTPprix View Post
    If there is a 500RPM discrepency on LAUNCH IE brake stalling it there is something wrong there. The GTO cluster is actually one of the more accurate clusters out there. I'd be suprised to see that much at such a steady state.
    I have a 6 speed, no brake stalling for me. Also its not like I have time to sit there with the revs up. Once the second staging light is lit the tree is coming down, they dont mess around at our track. So as soon as I pull in I have to get the revs up and dump it. I dont like getting the revs up first and slipping the clutch to move into the second bulb. Had clutch trouble slipping it before. Anyway, my point is the tach shoots up real quick just like it does on shifts. If it had time to stay at the rpm maybe it would be accurate.