Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Poor Support - 1999 Buick Regal

  1. #1
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412

    Poor Support - 1999 Buick Regal

    I am currently tuning a customers' vehicle with HP Tuners and I am surprised at the amount of missing parameters for this particular vehicle.

    All of the idle stuff is missing, besides idle speed.

    Engine Displacement is missing

    Crank Fuel is missing

    There is alot more missing, but these are the main things that are giving me issues right now.

    If there is anything I can do to speed up getting this stuff added in, please let me know.

    Eric
    Eric Brooks
    HP Tuners, LLC

  2. #2
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,268
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@hptuners
    there is no displacement variable for the v6 code, it is hardcoded based on the engine type. ie. 3800 is hardcoded to 3.8L
    I'll see if our engineer can respond regarding the other tables you are requesting. However you will find tables vary from application to application. With V6's there are over 500 operating systems we currently support so even adding one or two tables to each is a HUGE undertaking.
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  3. #3
    V6 is a lot different to the other platforms, many parameters don't exist or are implemented differently. I have a list of things to do on these platforms such as openloop fuel and a couple other things.

    Chris...
    I count sheep in hex...

  4. #4
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Thanks Chris.

    It will be awhile before I am working on the car again, as there were some mechanical problems.

    Hopefully you have an update out before then.
    Eric Brooks
    HP Tuners, LLC

  5. #5
    Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    132
    Ya get used to it, its a real pain going from say and Fbody to the Wbody.
    98 Buick GSX IS3 Heads/GenVblower/cammed/intercooled and stalled
    02 Collector Edition Trans Am WS6
    94 S-10 with Rancho 3" lift on 33's
    93 Typhoon
    07 Tahoe

  6. #6
    Tuner in Training Mr.Flipflops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    31
    Was there ever any resolution to this situation as far as tables goes? Or is it just something that we are going to have to deal with on my car (the car in question here)?

  7. #7
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    C'mon guys, if you need the parameter addresses, I can get my hands on them. Either way I need to know if you can get them added in?

    I would like to request the ability to define parameters in the software myself. I believe EFI Live offers this ability.
    Eric Brooks
    HP Tuners, LLC

  8. #8
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,268
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Brooks View Post
    C'mon guys, if you need the parameter addresses, I can get my hands on them. Either way I need to know if you can get them added in?

    I would like to request the ability to define parameters in the software myself. I believe EFI Live offers this ability.
    It will likely to be a while, there are roughly 600-1000 V6 operating systems we currently support making adding even one table with a known address to each weeks if not months of work. We have several tables on our to do list for them but currently no eta.

    We will not be adding the ability to add your own addresses as this opens up all kind of doors that we do not want to get involved with ie EPA and other liability issues.

    We have several customers running 9 & 10 second 1/4 times with our software for these applications so pcm limitations are minimal for the most part.
    Last edited by Bill@HPTuners; 04-13-2009 at 10:48 PM.
    It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...

    A wise man once said "google it"

  9. #9
    These cars are in the 8's with these parameters, IDK what makes this regal any different? What else could you possible need for a gm v-6 car?

  10. #10
    HPT Employee Eric@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Crawfordville, FL
    Posts
    2,412
    Quote Originally Posted by e85grandprix View Post
    These cars are in the 8's with these parameters, IDK what makes this regal any different? What else could you possible need for a gm v-6 car?
    How's the drivability on these 8 second regals?

    Not very good, I assure you.

    The car runs and makes power now, has made 550, and it would do well at the track, but it is a street car, and needs to be dialed in.
    Eric Brooks
    HP Tuners, LLC

  11. #11
    Tuner in Training Mr.Flipflops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    31
    Its completely different when you are talking about a daily driven 9 second car, and a track only car! I put 20k miles on the car a year, take it on weekend trips across the state, race it on a weekly basis and so forth, so drivability is key!

    Under WOT everything is there to dial in the car, and the car runs great up top. But as far as idling and cruising and such there are a lot of table that my old software did have that this one does not. And i'd hate to have to go back to the old program to address these issues, but it gets really annoying when you can let off the gas while cruising and the car will keep going by itself and wont idle down, not to mention you have to nail the brakes because the car is stalling up by itself, and keeps the transmisison nice and toasty. It gets annoying really fast!

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    213
    What are the mods on this Regal?

    We've done several thousand 3800 tunes, and never had in issue we couldn't find a solution for.
    2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (733 whp)
    2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing (716 whp), 10.750 @ 134.77 mph
    2016 Cadillac ATS-Vs (eleven ATS-Vs in the 9s)
    2008 Pontiac G8 (first G8 in the 10s), 10.727 @ 129.87 mph
    2000 Bonneville SSEi (first 3800 Bonneville in the 10s), 10.711 @ 125.71 mph
    1999 Grand Prix GT (first 3800 FWD in the 8s), 8.902 @ 154.90 mph
    1998 Firebird (first 3800 RWD in the 8s), 843 whp, 8.991 @ 152.12 mph
    1998 Grand Prix GTP (first 3800 FWD in the 10s), 9.499 @ 145.13 mph

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training Mr.Flipflops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    31
    8.0:1 Diamon pistons, L32 rods, ARP everything, Dover-Tech Ported Heads, Stattama ST4 cam, Gasket match LIM, Custom UIM, LS1 TB, 85mm MAF, Precision 725 intercooler, NOS 100 shot, Front PLOG, Stage 6 motorsports rear manifold, crossover and DP. Precision 74m DBB turbo, Aeromotive A1000 pump, -8an feed and -6an return, Ford Racing 80lb Injectors, PRJ Fuel rails, Aeromotive FPR, ZZP 3k stall....those are the majority of the power mods. If you have anything specific that you would like to know about, let me know.

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    213
    I dont' see anything in that mod list that you shouldn't be able to adjust for with the parameters in HP Tuners, with one exception.

    Your MAF table will peg at 11,500 Hz., so you're going to need a workaround for that.
    2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (733 whp)
    2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing (716 whp), 10.750 @ 134.77 mph
    2016 Cadillac ATS-Vs (eleven ATS-Vs in the 9s)
    2008 Pontiac G8 (first G8 in the 10s), 10.727 @ 129.87 mph
    2000 Bonneville SSEi (first 3800 Bonneville in the 10s), 10.711 @ 125.71 mph
    1999 Grand Prix GT (first 3800 FWD in the 8s), 8.902 @ 154.90 mph
    1998 Firebird (first 3800 RWD in the 8s), 843 whp, 8.991 @ 152.12 mph
    1998 Grand Prix GTP (first 3800 FWD in the 10s), 9.499 @ 145.13 mph

  15. #15
    Tuner in Training Mr.Flipflops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    31
    I have an AFC that is set lower to compensate for the MAF. I believe it is around 50-60% range across the board.

    The main problem that i am having is the idle, and some way to get the IACV to react differently, because the car will isle @ 2k for 20 seconds or so and then go down to 1,500 for another 5 second, and then back down to 1k where it needs to be. This goes for when it is going down the road and when I am stopping. I can try to get a video of what i am talking about.

  16. #16
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    213
    I have an AFC that is set lower to compensate for the MAF. I believe it is around 50-60% range across the board.
    My recommendation is to rescale your AFC to 80%. Then adjust your injector size to compensate. After this, all your idle tuning issues will become much simpler to address.
    2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (733 whp)
    2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing (716 whp), 10.750 @ 134.77 mph
    2016 Cadillac ATS-Vs (eleven ATS-Vs in the 9s)
    2008 Pontiac G8 (first G8 in the 10s), 10.727 @ 129.87 mph
    2000 Bonneville SSEi (first 3800 Bonneville in the 10s), 10.711 @ 125.71 mph
    1999 Grand Prix GT (first 3800 FWD in the 8s), 8.902 @ 154.90 mph
    1998 Firebird (first 3800 RWD in the 8s), 843 whp, 8.991 @ 152.12 mph
    1998 Grand Prix GTP (first 3800 FWD in the 10s), 9.499 @ 145.13 mph

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training Mr.Flipflops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    31
    You mean to rescale it only at the lower levels correct? 1k-5k range i am guessing, because i know on the top end i would MAX it @ 70% on the AFC, and this is only on low boost. Unfortunately i have been limited on boost, and i don't want to get into trouble when i get into 25+psi.

  18. #18
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    213
    The less correction you use in the AFC, the easier this car will be to tune, and the better off you will be. Also, the more linear you make your AFC changes, the better. So a 20% across the board scaling is much better in my opinion than 0% at one point in the table and 30% somewhere else.

    On our highest boost 3800 applications, we've been able to idle as smooth as stock and still go beyond 30 psi. This was done using the small LT1 MAF sensor and scaling the MAF frequency electronically by 20%.
    2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (733 whp)
    2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing (716 whp), 10.750 @ 134.77 mph
    2016 Cadillac ATS-Vs (eleven ATS-Vs in the 9s)
    2008 Pontiac G8 (first G8 in the 10s), 10.727 @ 129.87 mph
    2000 Bonneville SSEi (first 3800 Bonneville in the 10s), 10.711 @ 125.71 mph
    1999 Grand Prix GT (first 3800 FWD in the 8s), 8.902 @ 154.90 mph
    1998 Firebird (first 3800 RWD in the 8s), 843 whp, 8.991 @ 152.12 mph
    1998 Grand Prix GTP (first 3800 FWD in the 10s), 9.499 @ 145.13 mph

  19. #19
    Tuner in Training Mr.Flipflops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    31
    Right now the AFC is scalled straight across the board to adjust the entire table by the same %age. But i do understand what you are saying. What would you recommend for a maximum adjustment between frequency's on the AFC? 10%?

  20. #20
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Flipflops View Post
    Right now the AFC is scalled straight across the board to adjust the entire table by the same %age. But i do understand what you are saying. What would you recommend for a maximum adjustment between frequency's on the AFC? 10%?
    Not sure I understand your question...
    2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing (733 whp)
    2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing (716 whp), 10.750 @ 134.77 mph
    2016 Cadillac ATS-Vs (eleven ATS-Vs in the 9s)
    2008 Pontiac G8 (first G8 in the 10s), 10.727 @ 129.87 mph
    2000 Bonneville SSEi (first 3800 Bonneville in the 10s), 10.711 @ 125.71 mph
    1999 Grand Prix GT (first 3800 FWD in the 8s), 8.902 @ 154.90 mph
    1998 Firebird (first 3800 RWD in the 8s), 843 whp, 8.991 @ 152.12 mph
    1998 Grand Prix GTP (first 3800 FWD in the 10s), 9.499 @ 145.13 mph