Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Dodge Injector Calibration Values

  1. #1
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,525

    Dodge Injector Calibration Values

    Can anyone (Chris, Greg, other Dodge tuners) try and explain how Dodge characterizes injectors in thier operating systems? I've seen some of thier injector tables, but I am having a little trouble getting my head around them.

    It would be nice if someone could try and relate them to the Ford or GM tables I'm more familiar with and maybe give a proper method for "adjusting" them for larger, known injectors (FMC, Mototron, etc).
    Jaime

  2. #2
    they use two main tables, they are the inverse of each other.

    One is Injector PW (msec) vs. Fuel Mass (grams). This tells the PCM how long the pulse width should be for a given mass of fuel to be injected. The other is the fuel mass delivered for a given injector pulse width (why they have two tables, no idea). The they have multipliers that tell the PCM how this varies with manifold vacuum and other things.

    Then they have a regular injector offset table, that varies with ignition voltage.
    I count sheep in hex...

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@HPTuners View Post
    they use two main tables, they are the inverse of each other.

    One is Injector PW (msec) vs. Fuel Mass (grams). This tells the PCM how long the pulse width should be for a given mass of fuel to be injected. The other is the fuel mass delivered for a given injector pulse width (why they have two tables, no idea). The they have multipliers that tell the PCM how this varies with manifold vacuum and other things.

    Then they have a regular injector offset table, that varies with ignition voltage.
    So is it safe to say that the flow values are actual values based on the injector flow rating?

    By this I mean:

    Injector flow = 7.31 g/sec

    so

    1ms PW = 0.00731g of fuel

    no short pulse data or anything else factored in to populate this table?
    Jaime

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    1,020
    if you had a fuelmass vs IPW curve, that would be the resulting curve that involves all the nonlinear characteristics of fuel delivery. that's actually nicer than either GM or Ford.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by ElecTech View Post
    So is it safe to say that the flow values are actual values based on the injector flow rating?

    By this I mean:

    Injector flow = 7.31 g/sec

    so

    1ms PW = 0.00731g of fuel

    no short pulse data or anything else factored in to populate this table?
    yes and there is an inverse table as well, where 0.00731g = 1ms. It could have been done this way due to division being a very intensive calculation for earlier cpu's to gain throughput and it has stayed ever since. dunno.

    in theory these 2 tables contain all the injector non-linear & linear characteristics. The vacuum based multiplier then contains the pressure drop charactersitic. There are also fuel flow and temperature based multiplers as well.
    I count sheep in hex...

  6. #6
    Tuner BlackZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    German speaking part of Switzerland
    Posts
    159
    Does this relate to all Dodge PCMs or only NGC?
    '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ, 5.2L (Canada Import), 2" Lift
    (CAI, Modded Kegger, Ported TB, 3" Cat-Back, SCT Custom Tune)

    '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited ZG, 5.9 V8, Stock

    '03 Skoda Fabia, 1.4L 16v

    '98 Chevrolet Camaro V6, 3.8L, Targa, ZZP GT1 Cam, Dynomax Cat-Back [sold]

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackZJ View Post
    Does this relate to all Dodge PCMs or only NGC?
    jtec is different
    I count sheep in hex...

  8. #8
    Tuner BlackZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    German speaking part of Switzerland
    Posts
    159
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@HPTuners View Post
    jtec is different
    Is it more like GM or completely different?
    '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ, 5.2L (Canada Import), 2" Lift
    (CAI, Modded Kegger, Ported TB, 3" Cat-Back, SCT Custom Tune)

    '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited ZG, 5.9 V8, Stock

    '03 Skoda Fabia, 1.4L 16v

    '98 Chevrolet Camaro V6, 3.8L, Targa, ZZP GT1 Cam, Dynomax Cat-Back [sold]

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackZJ View Post
    Is it more like GM or completely different?
    from memory its a 3d table of injector PW vs RPM vs MAP or something like that
    I count sheep in hex...

  10. #10
    Tuner BlackZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    German speaking part of Switzerland
    Posts
    159
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris@HPTuners View Post
    from memory its a 3d table of injector PW vs RPM vs MAP or something like that
    OK, thank you!
    '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ, 5.2L (Canada Import), 2" Lift
    (CAI, Modded Kegger, Ported TB, 3" Cat-Back, SCT Custom Tune)

    '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited ZG, 5.9 V8, Stock

    '03 Skoda Fabia, 1.4L 16v

    '98 Chevrolet Camaro V6, 3.8L, Targa, ZZP GT1 Cam, Dynomax Cat-Back [sold]

  11. #11
    Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    161
    There is a global injector offset value, some calibrations I've seen use it, some just use the main fuel pulse width look up table as Chris mentioned. Also, there is a injector pulse width vs battery voltage offset table.