Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: 4500rpm limiter?

  1. #1
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    windsor, ontario, canada
    Posts
    51

    4500rpm limiter?

    I was tuning a car the other day and it went fine. I got all the fueling diled in perfect. car ran much smother and had more tip in response and was very crisp. So we went to the dyno for some numbers and to finish off the top of the maf curve and teh car would not go over 4500rpm. it was like it hit some torque management and droped the spark off like hitting a wall. but the fuel injector never fell off and the spark never droped. so we took it off teh dyno and on the street and it wont go past 4500 on the street when driving to the dyno it was fine. theres no bad plugs or missifire checked that and the cam and crank sensors are good.it runs and drives perfect but wont go past 450orpm. any ideas?
    also i will mention the car has a manual 5spd conversion but all automatic tranny functions have been removed. like i said it drove fine all day and weeks prior to that.
    96 l67 CAVALIER. PT76GTQ TURBO AND IC. PB: 10.62@138MPH ON 19PSI. DYNOED 502WHP AND 415FTLBS OF TORQUE.

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Louisville KY
    Posts
    200
    Have you tried to run the last tune before this happened to see if it still happens? Also post the current tune.

    02 VW Golf

    98 Bonneville SSE
    03 Grandprix GT
    EcoModder

  3. #3
    I am the owner of said car... I did try a recent file and it seemed fine but I am not 100% sure as it hit knock for some reason and I backed out of it, to see if would disappear and it did and I got back into it for a very short period of time, I will try again but with someone with me to keep an eye on the gauges, just a little safer that way!

    Alittle more info, we compared files, the one I showed up with before it was tuned, and the new file that is tuned, only major differences were the tuning aspect of it, Maf, VE, high/low octane, etc, no trans/torque changes.

    I will post up the files tomorrow, I do not have them with me.

  4. #4
    Here is the new tune........ I think I have found the issue, but need to speak to 3800cavalier first before I assume.

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Louisville KY
    Posts
    200
    I would make several changes to your tune set the Part throttle, full throttle shift/rpm speed back to normal or closer to stock. Currently it should not shift from first to second till it reaches 256mph and 8000rpm and the same for each gear.

    For full throttle shifts you might want to set the mph to 0 and the rpm to 500rpm less than you want it to shift at since it needs to meet both settings. For normal driving you will want to set the shift speeds at stock for atlest 50% tps and lower or even lower the shift mph.

    Also I would take all the torque reduction changes you made and place them atleast 50% between current and stock.

    Make both those changes and report back.
    If you want do the changes separately and report on both.

    02 VW Golf

    98 Bonneville SSE
    03 Grandprix GT
    EcoModder

  6. #6
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    windsor, ontario, canada
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantom View Post
    I would make several changes to your tune set the Part throttle, full throttle shift/rpm speed back to normal or closer to stock. Currently it should not shift from first to second till it reaches 256mph and 8000rpm and the same for each gear.

    For full throttle shifts you might want to set the mph to 0 and the rpm to 500rpm less than you want it to shift at since it needs to meet both settings. For normal driving you will want to set the shift speeds at stock for atlest 50% tps and lower or even lower the shift mph.

    Also I would take all the torque reduction changes you made and place them atleast 50% between current and stock.

    Make both those changes and report back.
    If you want do the changes separately and report on both.
    I was eliminating all posibilities as to thinking that the pcm was using any automatic tables for some reason even as the automatic functions are removed. the car is running a 5spd manual so the automatic table are usless.

    I may have found the isssue which is good news. well see tomorrow. i used my tune in my car as a base and isaak has 1 small differance then me i forgot! sorry dude!!!
    96 l67 CAVALIER. PT76GTQ TURBO AND IC. PB: 10.62@138MPH ON 19PSI. DYNOED 502WHP AND 415FTLBS OF TORQUE.

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Louisville KY
    Posts
    200
    Make sure to post what the issue was and keep us updated. Sorry I forgot that you had a manual in the car I should not respond to posts late at night after drinking.

    02 VW Golf

    98 Bonneville SSE
    03 Grandprix GT
    EcoModder

  8. #8
    What is going on with your maf curve? That has to be fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1



    So what was the issue?

    On a side note I would zero your P/E vs Time and flatline your IFR table as well.


    I do not not mean to step on anyones toes but that tune is in need of a lot of work still regardless of the 4500 rpm limiter.
    Regards,

    Brian Turner

    Dyno Tune Motorsports
    Dyno Tuning and Remote Tuning For Ford - GM - Chrysler Vehicles

    Click Here For Dyno Tune Motorsports

    1988 Ford Mustang GT INCON Systems TT
    331 Cubic Inches - Corn - 808 RWHP 918 RWTQ

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    Guessing you are using some L67 PCM. You have a scan of when this occurs? In particular, is it showing an injector pulsewidth drop or a timing advance drop when it occurs?
    97 Grand Prix GTP (not going to bother listing mods in detail) 1 messed up 97 PCM with about 30-50% of a 2003 calibration and parts of a few others.

  10. #10
    Found the problem in the maf....... car runs like a bat out of hell once again, even more so now that it has some personal tune time and more timing under its belt, going back to the dyno to try once again.

  11. #11
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    windsor, ontario, canada
    Posts
    51
    the maf curve was not finished. I know theres work on it to do. The pe and injector tables are like that for a reason not going into that now. Also as i said the injector pw and timing advance stay consistant they do not drop at all.

    With that being said i just uploaded a bin file to my car and now have the same issue. i changed nothing at all in the tune from when the car ran perfectly fine. except i changed the base pe from 11.9-11.8. this is the second car i have flashed with the beta 2.23 version so im wondering if theres a glitch in the beta. anyone using bata that could confirm this?
    96 l67 CAVALIER. PT76GTQ TURBO AND IC. PB: 10.62@138MPH ON 19PSI. DYNOED 502WHP AND 415FTLBS OF TORQUE.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by bilemke View Post
    Guessing you are using some L67 PCM. You have a scan of when this occurs? In particular, is it showing an injector pulsewidth drop or a timing advance drop when it occurs?
    Just to add to what 3800cavalier said... I am using a 99 GP PCM, I have scans but it shows nothing out of the ordinary except at 4500 it just stops, like a limiter. Timing does not drop of at all, only time it drops off is if I hit knock, and I had zero knock on that tune.

  13. #13
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    If timing doesnt drop and and injector pulse width doesnt drop, it should keep going.. That is the only two things the pcm could take away to slow your acceleration down.. Short of shutting off an injector or two (even though pulse width stays the same).
    97 Grand Prix GTP (not going to bother listing mods in detail) 1 messed up 97 PCM with about 30-50% of a 2003 calibration and parts of a few others.

  14. #14
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    windsor, ontario, canada
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by bilemke View Post
    If timing doesnt drop and and injector pulse width doesnt drop, it should keep going.. That is the only two things the pcm could take away to slow your acceleration down.. Short of shutting off an injector or two (even though pulse width stays the same).
    exactly thats why im confused right now!
    96 l67 CAVALIER. PT76GTQ TURBO AND IC. PB: 10.62@138MPH ON 19PSI. DYNOED 502WHP AND 415FTLBS OF TORQUE.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by 3800 cavalier View Post
    the maf curve was not finished. I know theres work on it to do. The pe and injector tables are like that for a reason not going into that now. Also as i said the injector pw and timing advance stay consistant they do not drop at all.

    With that being said i just uploaded a bin file to my car and now have the same issue. i changed nothing at all in the tune from when the car ran perfectly fine. except i changed the base pe from 11.9-11.8. this is the second car i have flashed with the beta 2.23 version so im wondering if theres a glitch in the beta. anyone using bata that could confirm this?

    I've used the newest BETA to flash my GTP numerous times without this issue.

  16. #16
    Even when he sends me a tune with his beta, it will not open in my software, it used to!

  17. #17
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    Hmm. No problems like that with the beta for me..

    Only other thing I could think of, if you are not scanning it, would be misfires..
    97 Grand Prix GTP (not going to bother listing mods in detail) 1 messed up 97 PCM with about 30-50% of a 2003 calibration and parts of a few others.

  18. #18
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    windsor, ontario, canada
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by bilemke View Post
    Hmm. No problems like that with the beta for me..

    Only other thing I could think of, if you are not scanning it, would be misfires..
    equal # of misfires at idle due to the cam but only 8-12 counts which is ok for the vs cam in isaaks car
    96 l67 CAVALIER. PT76GTQ TURBO AND IC. PB: 10.62@138MPH ON 19PSI. DYNOED 502WHP AND 415FTLBS OF TORQUE.

  19. #19
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by 3800 cavalier View Post
    equal # of misfires at idle due to the cam but only 8-12 counts which is ok for the vs cam in isaaks car
    And if they are only occurring at idle, shouldnt matter.

    Well, I doubt it is a software problem.. But, who knows.. Got a spare PCM to try?
    97 Grand Prix GTP (not going to bother listing mods in detail) 1 messed up 97 PCM with about 30-50% of a 2003 calibration and parts of a few others.

  20. #20
    I have a different pcm in the car now, same issue when I load the tune.