How do i transfer my AFR error data from scanner to editor?

[Paz]

I've read for the last week on how to do this but be buggered if i can get a definite answer anywhere!

How do i transfer all the AFR error data etc i'm getting from my scanner into my editor?

I've got my graphs set up in scanner, one with the row axis and column axis same as my VE table in my SD tune in editor, another also set up the same as the VVE editor, both using maths to get error in % as per standard in the scanner V3.2.81.

Can i use this error info to directly change my VE table by using paste special (?), if so which one as i have tried all of them and they make some pretty drastic changes to the VE table directly in editor (obviously i need to smooth afterwards as well)?

Large percent of the time the ECM is commanding an AFR of around 14.61 (not in boost situation), my actual AFR reading from wideband is on average anywhere from 15 to 16 or 17 so i need to richen it up (adjust VE table?).

[Jggregory99]

I seem to have had the same issue... Cut copy past special % sent my VVE into a skyrocket after calculating the coefficent.... Values at 1000 went up to 40K +... But, I found if you ONLY copy the actual logged data cells and not the entire table... Lets say you logged up to .96 MAP at 4000 RPM... and you only make changes to THAT section of the VVE.... it doesn't throw the whole thing out of whack.... But if you copy and paste the ENTIRE table...lets say 400 RPM to 8000 RPM from .08-1.05 MAP..... even the un-logged cells change... Just an observation I made... but as a newb myself.... I am not sure I want to make that change without some senior tuner input... Best of luck though...

[SultanHassanMasTuning]

when setting up your histogram, copy the axis of the table you want to change that way it will not throw off things

[Paz]

I've done that Sultan, it's just which "Paste Special" should i use when entering data directly into my VE table?

Anyone have a VE table MAP axis that is separated up into the 33 squares suitable for up to 210kpa or 255kpa (i'm running a 2.5bar map), I'm currently at 175kpa but as Carson mentioned i'll only just be scraping in at about 10psi of boost when i really get into final tuning (rather be set up correct now than have to change it all again).

I'm not sure where i need to keep my finer detail and where the larger steps are better placed in the axis?

[schpenxel]

15 21.5 28.125 34.75 41.25 47.75 54.375 61 67.5 74 80.625 87.25 93.75 100.25 106.875 113.5 120 126.5 133.125 139.75 146.25 152.75 159.375 166 172.5 179 185.625 192.25 198.75 205.25 211.875 218.5 225

Here's one I did that goes to 225 kpa

[Paz]

Awesome thanks Carson, very much appreciated!