Incorrect / Missing Parameters? Let us know

[caniggia]

I just came from newer Mustang, 2008, same, no mixture change, OL or CL, there is fixed wideband installed. I tested only idle this time.

edit, additional test.
20 percent rich at idle, 0 part throttle and 10 lean wot, no matter what LWFM set, even zeroed, maxed. Car drives normal.
As on another tested before...

So again, if someone will have 3v in his hands, please do same thing for test and let here know how it looks.

[Eric@HPTuners]

Both load w failed MAF tables?

[caniggia]

For test i'm changing always both.

[caniggia]

Another mustang, completly stock except jlt cai. I've put original Ford racing tune for test and only cange was I've put maf transfer for jlt 110.
See compare, nothing has changed after both LWFM were set to max so 1.99.

01. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf.hpl
01. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf.jpg
02. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf_LWFM 1.99.hpl
02. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf_LWFM 1.99.jpg

[caniggia]

Tunes for above.

01. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf.hpt
02. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf_LWFM 1.99.hpt

[ElecTech]

Another mustang, completly stock except jlt cai. I've put original Ford racing tune for test and only cange was I've put maf transfer for jlt 110.
See compare, nothing has changed after both LWFM were set to max so 1.99.

01. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf.hpl








01. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf.jpg
02. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf_LWFM 1.99.hpl
02. stock ford racing tune but jlt 110 maf_LWFM 1.99.jpg

I see a 25% difference between the two logs, so there is a change taking place. The O2 voltages reflect changes as well. I haven't looked over everything that you have posted, but I still feel like the issue lies more in how the scanner is showing you the data than an actual template issue.

I would suggest starting another thread to keep this one from getting bogged down with logs and things. You have gotten it on record and Eric is aware of it. Honestly, it doesn't sound like its going to get resolved real soon.

Just my opinion. If I could test it for you I would, but I would try reducing the number of logged items to just the basic items needed to log load, TPS, and Fuel Trims to see if a clearer picture appears.

[caniggia]

In real theres no difference between those 2, difference is only time of log, so this may cause what you see. With 1.99 lwfm he should be rich like hell.
I think i documented this enough, so maybe Eric will find out.
Thanks

[1998purplez28]

2012 Mustang, purchased 2 credits, running beta when ever I change the revs per mile to 770 and save it, then reopen the file, its changes to some crazy number this is with vid disabled.

[Eric@HPTuners]

2012 Mustang, purchased 2 credits, running beta when ever I change the revs per mile to 770 and save it, then reopen the file, its changes to some crazy number this is with vid disabled.

Fixed today.

[Eric@HPTuners]

How about a disable skip shift feature for the 2011-2012 cars? I just looked through mine and I didn't see that option anywhere.

Added today to all Manual transmission definitions, including the manual transmission gear ratios.

[Eric@HPTuners]

Can we get Commanded Lambda When Fuel is Overridden?

It has been added to all OSIDs.

[RWTD]

Have you found how to modify mixture in sd mode?

How are you setting the MAF failed to obtain SD mode? And, curious, why are you tuning it like this? Why not input the Loads you see when the MAF is enabled into each cell of the LWFM table? You can easily set the TP to only open so far, go out and make a run in say 3rd or 4th gear, then input all the loads you're logging for each TP position vs RPM. If your MAF is dialed in correctly, that'll get you pretty damn close.

[Eric@HPTuners]

How are you setting the MAF failed to obtain SD mode? And, curious, why are you tuning it like this? Why not input the Loads you see when the MAF is enabled into each cell of the LWFM table? You can easily set the TP to only open so far, go out and make a run in say 3rd or 4th gear, then input all the loads you're logging for each TP position vs RPM. If your MAF is dialed in correctly, that'll get you pretty damn close.

I agree.

I did go through the logic and all that is used is the LWFM table, and there are two adders which are zero'd out for this application. One was an adder for EGR and I don't recall the other.

[Brice]

F250 transmission Tuning are very poor, is it on the road map to add parameters ?

[Eric@HPTuners]

F250 transmission Tuning are very poor, is it on the road map to add parameters ?

Yes, is there a specific example you have for what is missing that you would like to see? I like to keep a list.

[Brice]

Yes, is there a specific example you have for what is missing that you would like to see? I like to keep a list.

Well ... the same than the F150.
Here is the only parameters I've got :

F250.png

[Bill@HPTuners]

Well ... the same than the F150.
Here is the only parameters I've got :

F250.png

post the .hpt file.

fseriestrans.JPG

[Brice]

F250 stock

[zr1driver]

On Ford F 150 Raptor BBHH4K2 Tire Revs per Distance is Missing to adjust speedo.

[Eric@HPTuners]

On Ford F 150 Raptor BBHH4K2 Tire Revs per Distance is Missing to adjust speedo.

I am aware of this, as that parameter does not exist on the trucks. It is replaced with another one, and I have to code it. I may get it done today.