but a bigger one on it. its the equinox throttle body.
but a bigger one on it. its the equinox throttle body.
2003 Ford excursion 6.0 PSD
No limit intake
Straight pipe
Studded
EGR delete
KC billet single plane compressor wheel
Self Tuned
XDP Regulated return
RDP Fuel sump
AEM progressive water meth
Custom suspension air bags
8" lift
35" tires
Why bigger? It's not a choke point. Need response in the other thread pls.
And who told you don't do it...haha I bet your having fun now. At least your learning a lot from it.
i don't know what size your equinox tb is but after adding heavily modifying the factory tb i machined it to 70/75 and 90. 70 was hard to control but since i had it all locked down on the dyno i would only see fluctuations every so often. 90mm was a beast at 35psi netting an extra 18 hp at the same boost levels on the 70/75, but unfortunately was a idling nightmare that ended with programming a high idle speed.
hex coding allowed a few other changes but i outsourced that due to my non-existent coding skills.
2000 Ford Mustang - Top Sportsman
have you tried bumping rpm by 50 just to see if upping the required air helps settle the plate movement?
2000 Ford Mustang - Top Sportsman
2003 Ford excursion 6.0 PSD
No limit intake
Straight pipe
Studded
EGR delete
KC billet single plane compressor wheel
Self Tuned
XDP Regulated return
RDP Fuel sump
AEM progressive water meth
Custom suspension air bags
8" lift
35" tires
the tables you need are in the astra ecu.
2000 Ford Mustang - Top Sportsman
2003 Ford excursion 6.0 PSD
No limit intake
Straight pipe
Studded
EGR delete
KC billet single plane compressor wheel
Self Tuned
XDP Regulated return
RDP Fuel sump
AEM progressive water meth
Custom suspension air bags
8" lift
35" tires
oh my bad i remember reading it and went on to calculating some 4 link stuff for my ride and forgot. ill get to it tonight i have a note set aside.
2000 Ford Mustang - Top Sportsman
2003 Ford excursion 6.0 PSD
No limit intake
Straight pipe
Studded
EGR delete
KC billet single plane compressor wheel
Self Tuned
XDP Regulated return
RDP Fuel sump
AEM progressive water meth
Custom suspension air bags
8" lift
35" tires
[B]SIDE NOTE: [/B]Don't forget to correct the 600 rpm row in the main spark tables and change it to 800 rpm to match the optimum spark tables.[/QUOTE]
Hey Bill should the MS table load axis match the OS tables? Os shows 0 to start and MS shows 15. does this matter?
Mikes timing table thread just got me thinking. Thanks
Last edited by powermizer; 05-21-2015 at 04:46 PM.
Idk why they are different stock. I would treat it like the MS and OS at 600/800 rpm. Idk why MS is at 600 and OS at 800. I just changed the MS to 800.
What about the load axis on the OS table? It reads 0. The MS table reads 15. So do you suggest putting the OS table to 15 instead of 0 or the other way around? Thanks Bill
Last edited by powermizer; 05-21-2015 at 11:24 PM. Reason: added more info
Try both and see how you like it. What does it do when at 0 or at 15? Change it and find out.
Thanks Mike. I should have known the answer. LOL
My goal is for people to learn to try tables out and test them on their own. You guys may come up with something we never thought of and be able to teach us. Or maybe you guys will perfect something better then we have. The goal is to learn it not take what we have done.
Then too we may never know if anyone has perfected something if they don't tell us what they do. lol its all good. So many of you have worked your butts off, and worn your engines out to learn this stuff. I cant blame anyone for holding back a little or a lot. I'm just grateful for the help I've gotten. I hope this doesn't sound factious, because its not. Thanks Mike and all.
The only things I hold back are specific numbers for tables or current theories in the testing stage in which case I talk to a couple of the great minds to get a different persons insight but even then they don't get all the facts until it's completed and then they are the ones that see.