Bill,
do you have any idea when it will be released?
Bill,
do you have any idea when it will be released?
Keith even..lol
So is this available for download or not? where to get the link?
Yes. Read the thread...Originally Posted by Stez
i did, please advise where can i download it from?
email support requesting access to the beta software.
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
sorry , im newb, what do that means email support, do i need to send email to somebody to get that? or what should i do?
Head to : http://www.hptuners.com/help/
And navigate to Introduction > Contacting Customer Support
I lost my access to 2.25 on my customer page and not sure why.
2008 Pontiac G5 2.2L (main oil seal became a crunchy Autumn leaf, RIP)
2016 Fiesta 1.0L Ecoboost - Project "not-so-detestable"
It only stays active for a while on that page, I believe
Ok thanks. I thought I did something wrong. Good to know it wasn't my fault haha
2008 Pontiac G5 2.2L (main oil seal became a crunchy Autumn leaf, RIP)
2016 Fiesta 1.0L Ecoboost - Project "not-so-detestable"
Are we going to beable to use speed density using the vitual ve? Or do we still have to use maff?
Looks awesome! It would be nice to zoom into the 3D graph of the VE table though in conjunction with the change comparison between old and new VE settings like the Bluecat tool. I found it was a good tool to see where there were some jagged areas of the map to smooth out.
I recently noticed that there is a "Show Zone Numbers" Checkbox which is extremely useful.
Thanks for this guys!
Will there be an option/checkbox to convert GMVE to normal % VE?
www.tunedbynishan.com
2018 Mustang GT - 10R80
A little complaint that might serve as a helpful warning to others:
I got excited about the new Virtual VE support, so I downloaded the latest beta and read the car I need to tune with the beta. Then I saved the tune file and started to check out the the VVE featrures. It wan't until then that I realized I can't actually use the new features yet. OK, no problem so far. I'm glad HP tuners is working on it and I'm glad they let us take a peek ahead of time for some constructive criticism.
But....
I work much faster with something I am familiar with. So if I can't actually manipulate the VVE with the new beta yet, I want to tune it with 2.24 so everything looks familiar and and I can work faster. But now I can't use the file I read in 2.24 because I read it with 2.25 beta. I didn't know that ahead of time.
Just read the pcm with 2.24...
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
That's what I did. But what about the tune licence? I had already committed to tuning this car. Once that decision is made I licence the tune. Lucky for me I have the full vehicle model year licence for this particular year car. Otherwise it would have cost me 2 credits to re-read it and start over.
It really was no-harm, no-foul. But from what I understand it could have cost me a hundred bucks if the car was 1 model year different. Maybe the warning will save someone else a hassle.
Last edited by realspeeddan; 11-26-2014 at 01:03 PM.
The vehicle get licensed in the interface not the software. I'd think that once you license it, you wouldn't have to re-license due to software change. Is that right Bill?
AAHHHHH!!!!!!
This is true. Just re-sync the software with the interface and all of the licenses are carried over.
Jaime
Your licenses are part of your cable. I've used mine on several PC's, with several versions of HPTuners...I can still work on the first car I ever touched...if I still had the car.
2010 Camaro SS M6. Stock Bottom End, Heads/Cam/Intake/Headers/Exhaust.
2005 Silverado RCSB. Forged 370 LQ9/Borg-Forced Inductions T6 S484/Jake's Stage 4 4L80E with D3 Brake/4WD.
2023 Durango Hellcat
Reply With Quote