I do a lot of Gen4 Gen5 GM applications. Is there a reason flash times are WAY faster in 2.24 than 2.25? I can literally flash the ECM and TCM in 2.24 as fast as ECM only in 2.25.
Sort of a petty question however time is money lol.
I do a lot of Gen4 Gen5 GM applications. Is there a reason flash times are WAY faster in 2.24 than 2.25? I can literally flash the ECM and TCM in 2.24 as fast as ECM only in 2.25.
Sort of a petty question however time is money lol.
James Short - [email protected]
Located in Central Kentucky
ShorTuning
2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400
2.25 uses much safer timing than 2.24, per the manufactures implementation.
In some cases though, the timing might be a little too safe and will be adjusted town to reduce write times.
We got this guy Not Sure, ...
I noticed that too. In my case it was only an additional 30 sec. or so on an E38 manual, but definitely noticeable. I just assumed it was for better error checking. The E40, by contrast, seems a little faster.Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ
Jaime
A bit off topic, but has anyone reported "Read" issues with 97-98 LS PCM's.
Jaime
No
It doesn't have to be perfect, it just needs to be done in two weeks...
A wise man once said "google it"
Ok, looks like I'll have to try and gather more information for you.
I had a 98 Corvette fail to read using version .2855 (I think). It would hang half way through the read and then time out. I tried several attempts with the same results. 2.24 Read and Write worked just fine. This was the first 97-98 PCM Ive tried with 2.25 so I wasn't sure what the deal was.
If I can still get access to the car, I'll try again with a more recent build and get any debug and info files I can.
Jaime
Reply With Quote