Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: VE not responding to changes

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27

    VE not responding to changes

    Trying to tune my ve table and it will not respond to any changes I make, its running really rich under part throttle and goes lean immediately after part throttle. I've tried everything I can think of and nothing changes. The truck ran good I changed back to a 1.7 rocker and added a nitrous plate and now I can't get it to do anything I've tried 2 different pcms no changes.
    Specs
    408ci lq4 13:1 comp
    WCCH Stage 3 ls3 heads
    Edelbrock Super Victor 4500 flange worked by Fast Forward race engines
    T&D shaftmount rockers 1.7
    259/279 .652/.632 114+3 nitrous cam HR
    Accufab 4500 tb
    80lb deutsch werks injectors
    Magnafuel 750
    Magnafuel regulator

  2. #2
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,565
    Tune and log would be helpful.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  3. #3
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    I'll post the tune shortly

  4. #4
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    tune file
    Attached Files Attached Files

  5. #5
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    im using a vacuum ref regulator so fow rate is steady 78lb/hr at 43.5psi set with ref line un hooked

  6. #6
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,565
    How are you trying to change the VE?

    Are you atleast using a wideband to help make these corrections because that VE table is way messed up.

    I assume you are using E85 fuel?
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  7. #7
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by 5FDP View Post
    How are you trying to change the VE?

    Are you atleast using a wideband to help make these corrections because that VE table is way messed up.

    I assume you are using E85 fuel?
    Yes I am using a wide band set up using lambda error % and I am using e85 it's probably all out of wack all the different changes I've tried to make to it I had idle areas down to 15-20 and it was still idling about .75 to .85 no change what so ever

  8. #8
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    Commanded afr is 9.87 or 1.000 at all times, until in pe and it commands .8 lambda to be safe, is there anything else that controls fueling other than the VE table that I'm missing? I didn't have this issue before. I have pulled the pump and filters both clean. Before I just made the necessary changes err% to the VE table and it was very close 0-4% through out the table.

  9. #9
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    log file
    Attached Files Attached Files

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Yeah that VE table looks pretty rough.

    Does it have the factory O2 sensors still?
    Post a log and tune if you want help

    VCM Suite V3+ GETTING STARTED THREADS / HOW TO's

    Tuner by night
    CPX Tuning
    2005 Corvette, M6
    ECS 1500 Supercharger
    AlkyControl Meth, Monster LT1-S Twin, NT05R's
    ID1000's, 220/240, .598/.598, 118 from Cam Motion

    2007 Escalade, A6
    Stock

  11. #11
    Tuner Turbo_Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Putnam, CT
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by schpenxel View Post
    Yeah that VE table looks pretty rough.

    Does it have the factory O2 sensors still?
    Even if it did its pretty much gonna be open loop all the time.

    If all you did was change your rockers, there should be almost no difference in the tune. Very slight fuel trim. So either you have a bad wideband, or you have something else going on (misfire, valves too right, vacuum leak, bad map sensor) .. It shouldnt be that far off.


    EDIT--- I see it, look at IAT in your log. That's your problem. Either fix/hook up the IAT sensor, or rescale the whole range to 70 degrees if you arent gonna run one.
    Last edited by Turbo_Mike; 08-24-2016 at 10:57 AM.
    2003 305/555 QCSB Cummins
    Piston/rod/sleeve/fire ring/dual CP3/300 overs
    Super Stick NV5600
    S366/S480

  12. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbo_Mike View Post

    EDIT--- I see it, look at IAT in your log. That's your problem. Either fix/hook up the IAT sensor, or rescale the whole range to 70 degrees if you arent gonna run one.
    Yup. That is probably it.. can't account for air density changes if there isn't an IAT, and there will def. be air temp changes on a FI setup.

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    That was my assumption that changing rockers I should just have minimal fuel changes I'll try the iat it was like that before though.

  14. #14
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,565
    I'm suprised you even got the tune okay before with having no intake temps sensor, that is a must when trying to tune speed density.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  15. #15
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    Idk how I skipped that step I did alot of reading on that subject and found some really good Info I'll try it here shortly and keep you guys posted

  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Things are going to be way off when you first put the sensor back in

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    I tried putting the bias to 2 no change gonna grab a sensor and try that

  18. #18
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    Ok digging this back up having the same issues. I have read flowed injectors, fresh magnafuel 750, and added an iat sensor. I am still unable to make fueling adjustments I've even tried to set the cells at 5 in my Ve table still idles pig rich .750-.8 lambda I'm beginning to wonder if my pcm is bad

  19. #19
    Advanced Tuner veee8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    449
    Look at your injector pulsewidth in the log, and check out you short pulse adder in the tune. You are in the 5 ms range in the log, I would imagine that needs to be a bit lower. Also if you are going to have your flow rate table for vacuum reference, you need to have the offset table setup that way too.

    I can see what you did, you copied the first frame of SPA from Deatschwerks info, which is the limit, not the first cell in the adder table. Fix that, and you should be able to tune away.
    Last edited by veee8; 12-08-2016 at 04:24 PM.
    www.crawford-racing.com
    Home of the original and best selling CR-Fueler plug and play port injection controller kits for all GM Gen V direct injection platforms.

  20. #20
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    27
    Thanks for the reply I made the change to the spa what should I do for offset set it to 1?