i've been slowly getting my VEs in line (i think) using my wideband and HPT. i noticed that my stock tune had a fairly nice, smooth VE but when i'm trying to dial in 14.7 in all my cells the closer i get the choppier my VEs look. is smoothness or acuracy more important? are resonance in my changed intake and headers to blame making certain RPMs and MAPs more pronounced? also my LTFTs are turned off and i set my ECT vs IAT to 284* to force open loop, do i turn off my STFTs also when logging?
2004 GTO Blk/Rd M6 (Ziggy)
Best ET: 12.390 ET, 112.73MPH, 1.819 60ft
I wouldn't worry about it...the PCM interpolates anyhow. Mine does the exact same thing...different RPMs and MAPs are more pronounced.
how about showing those Ve tables!
heres mine...
2000 camaro ss
custom intake(had pics in a post in the lounge)
Jet hot longtubes with 2000series coating
3" true duals with x pipe and dynomax bullets and dumped at rear axle
SD tuned
-Scott -
also..its not necessary to have a perfectly smooth VE...
Just dont have any major spikes in it..like if a set of cells goes 70-72-75-99-80...then the 99 is probably not correct
-Scott -
Scott after looking at your mine seams to be not to bad.
you can look at some later years of GM's ve tables and see that they no longer shoot for smooth either...
-Scott -
I'm definitely beyond making mine smooth...engines don't exactly behave like we'd expect, and that's good enough to set my mind at ease.
Mine too. Mine are perfect as far as I can tell (VE wise) but not smooth looking like stock. I was tempted to smooth them but I'm glad I didn't now.Originally Posted by Dragman
Last edited by Nithros; 06-09-2006 at 05:36 PM.
Reply With Quote