Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ramping AFR and Ramping Spark Advance

  1. #1

    Ramping AFR and Ramping Spark Advance

    I have seen on some stock tunes that the oem ramps timing+/- in wot areas. I have also seen some ramping +/- with PE. Is there really any major benefit of ramping the timing down during peak torque areas?

    I have heard some say if you lower timing at peak torque, then you can ramp in more timing after peak torque vs. just running a flat timing curve of say 24 across.

    Interest in your opinions.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,104
    flat timing and flat fueling is not what the engine wants. period. you will gain more power and hold it longer by giving the engine what it wants. flat 28 degree's and 12.8 afr is leaving power on the table as this is not what the engine wants. ever.

    It's done by lazy people who don't want to take the time to work with the engine, not against it.
    The most hated, make the most power.
    93 Ranger. 5.3 D1X. 1069hp.

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    2,503
    Question to me is whether you get more power and more
    efficiency out of a fat mixture and early spark, or lean
    and late. This has a lot to do with combustion particulars
    and I think you want to experiment unless you're following
    a recipe that's been wrung out.

    As an example if you have a finite burn time on the hole
    then as RPMs run up you will start to lose ability to
    convert the pressure pulse to mechanical energy -
    either you fire early and oppose the crank for a bit,
    or you fire late and send it out the exhaust unused.
    At some point you'll want leaner (faster burn) to "fit
    it all in the window" of the power stroke. Spark only
    positions the burn, doesn't control its duration. For
    a fixed duration there is a best timing of course.
    And fat duration has value in terms of broadening
    the pressure pulse and the delivered torque at lower
    RPM where you can get it all done and harvested
    within the power stroke (and furthermore, at the
    best crank angle for converting pressure to torque
    all-told).

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by Area47 View Post
    flat timing and flat fueling is not what the engine wants. period. you will gain more power and hold it longer by giving the engine what it wants. flat 28 degree's and 12.8 afr is leaving power on the table as this is not what the engine wants. ever.

    It's done by lazy people who don't want to take the time to work with the engine, not against it.
    ding ding ding

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner 68Camaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Van Buren, AR
    Posts
    326
    richer mixture and less timing through the torque curve (generally 3800-4800 on LS engines depending on bore x stroke, cam, etc) and curving leaner with rpm and putting a little timing back in most definitely will make for the best performing engine. This tuning strategy works for all engines (NA) but every engine combination will create a different torque curve and peak depending on every aspect of the engine build.

    This is what defines true top tier tuners - understanding the engine combination and then wringing out every last ounce of performance from said engine combo

    and doing this while maintaining longevity, reliability....