Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: NO PE Commanded CL active, not switching to OL ACCEL/DECEL

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30

    NO PE Commanded CL active, not switching to OL ACCEL/DECEL

    If someone could please advise.

    I have a 2001 suburban 2500 6.0L / 4l80 that I am working on. Completely stock. I usually like to tweak PE a little on the stock setups, mix in a little trans numbers and i prefer the response etc i get from it.

    While working on this suburban, I for the life of me cannot get it to use PE, and i cannot figure out why.

    When working on my silverado, I can command @ 40% throttle, and itll do exaclty the ratio i requested. In scanner it will change from CL to OL ACCEL/DECEL when over 40% tps. and return to CL when back under 40%

    On the suburban, with the PE settings set for 40% throttle and 1.1 to 1.25 PE command requests, it sticks SOLID at 14.68 the entire time and never leaves CL as the silverado does.

    So i figured i would try and disable CL, by setting temps for ECT to 225, with the intent of it never seeing CL, and in turn the system stays in OL - NOT READY.

    Im hoping theres something ive overlooked. Ive tinkered with a few 4.8/5.3s but never these 6.0s and im hoping its just something Ive missed.

    Thanks very much for taking the time to read.
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  2. #2
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,582
    Post tune.

    Likely something simple.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,343
    Post tune

    Maybe even a log

  4. #4
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by schpenxel View Post
    Post tune

    Maybe even a log
    01 2500 burb 0.05.hpt

    burb 0.005 log1.hpl

    Thanks!!
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  5. #5
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,582
    You have a 60sec time delay as well as a 5,500 rpm delay for PE, that is the reason you never see PE.

    Remove the 60sec time delay and set the RPM delay to 2,000rpm.

    You must be in advanced view to see every table. Edit > view > advanced.


    Also you may not be able to get away with so much timing, 28 degrees is kind of alot on a bone stock 6.0.
    Last edited by 5FDP; 01-03-2017 at 08:24 PM.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,343
    Set enrichment ramp in to 1

    Delay RPM to 2000

    and delay to 0 seconds

    Try that

    edit--I'm going to have to start deleting your posts when you beat me, lol ^

  7. #7
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    .002 GOOD PULLS!.hpl

    Heres one of my good silverado tunes that do well for me

    Really appreciate the input and advice. Very much a beginner here
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  8. #8
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by 5FDP View Post
    You have a 60sec time delay as well as a 5,500 rpm delay for PE, that is the reason you never see PE.

    Remove the 60sec time delay and set the RPM delay to 2,000rpm.

    You must be in advanced view to see every table. Edit > view > advanced.


    Also you may not be able to get away with so much timing, 28 degrees is kind of alot on a bone stock 6.0.
    ah advanced tables, i pull back timing too, thank you!
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  9. #9
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,582
    Quote Originally Posted by schpenxel View Post
    Set enrichment ramp in to 1

    Delay RPM to 2000

    and delay to 0 seconds

    Try that

    edit--I'm going to have to start deleting your posts when you beat me, lol ^

    I've got that quick trigger or that I have nothing else to do LOL.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  10. #10
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by 5FDP View Post
    I've got that quick trigger or that I have nothing else to do LOL.
    You guys are awesome. Thanks so much.

    I feel silly missing that. My mechanic is tearing me a new one.
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  11. #11
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    so this one has me confused, i replaced my ignition tables with the stock ones, to be safe, and the numbers are significantly lower, yet check out the charts i am getting.

    this is the .005 log that had the 28 degrees set.
    .005.PNG

    this is the .006 that i replaced with stock timing (PE works great now too)
    .006.PNG

    Am i reading this wrong, or is it somehow using more advance with the stock numbers, I mean where 28 was previously, its now like 10-14.
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  12. #12
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,343
    The units are totally different so it's not easy to compare like that. The row axis you're using is in units of MAP but the high octane timing table is based on cylinder airmass (g/cyl)

    Just doing some quick looking though it does look like something else is pulling some timing at the high end. You aren't logging hardly anything though so I can't tell what. Could be burst KR, could be knock, could be any number of IAT or ECT adders, torque management.. all kinds of stuff

    Also comparing min vs. max for the higher RPM timing areas it's varying 5-6*
    Post a log and tune if you want help

    VCM Suite V3+ GETTING STARTED THREADS / HOW TO's

    Tuner by night
    CPX Tuning
    2005 Corvette, M6
    ECS 1500 Supercharger
    AlkyControl Meth, Monster LT1-S Twin, NT05R's
    ID1000's, 220/240, .598/.598, 118 from Cam Motion

    2007 Escalade, A6
    Stock

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by schpenxel View Post
    The units are totally different so it's not easy to compare like that. The row axis you're using is in units of MAP but the high octane timing table is based on cylinder airmass (g/cyl)

    Just doing some quick looking though it does look like something else is pulling some timing at the high end. You aren't logging hardly anything though so I can't tell what. Could be burst KR, could be knock, could be any number of IAT or ECT adders, torque management.. all kinds of stuff

    Also comparing min vs. max for the higher RPM timing areas it's varying 5-6*
    Do you have a layout you could share that you recommend? something I can pull a log on and share my logs?

    IAT or ECT i did not mess with. Torque management i did a little but i thought i removed TM.

    This help is SO greatly appreciated. Im quite certain im more on the lines of dangerous than safe at this point, and I just want to make sure I dont destroy my engine.
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  14. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,343
    You have to learn how to make graphs

    It's literally one of the most powerful things that HPT can do and once you understand it isn't hard at all

    Basically you need to figure out 3 things.

    1. What do you want the column axis to be based on?
    2. What do you want the row axis to be based on?
    3. What do you want graphed?

    In this case you want #1 and #2 to line up with the spark table in the tune, so column axis would be engine speed (RPM) and row axis would be cylinder airmass.

    #3 would be ignition timing since that's what you're wanting to see

    It will look something like this when finished

    asb.JPG
    Post a log and tune if you want help

    VCM Suite V3+ GETTING STARTED THREADS / HOW TO's

    Tuner by night
    CPX Tuning
    2005 Corvette, M6
    ECS 1500 Supercharger
    AlkyControl Meth, Monster LT1-S Twin, NT05R's
    ID1000's, 220/240, .598/.598, 118 from Cam Motion

    2007 Escalade, A6
    Stock

  15. #15
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    30
    Ok, I think I see where you are going. Basically the graph now reflects what variables the editor uses. Giving me a more 1:1 view.

    What I am doing now is going back to a stock tune, to eliminate any quirks i might of had in there. I am adding my PE back in and my trans numbers. Going to leave everything else to same, and pull a log on lunch today.

    For e10 gas, is it recommended to change stoich to 14.1 roughly, or keep it at 14.68?
    Tony B
    02 TrailBlazer LTZ 4.2/4l60e
    01 2500 suburban 6.0/4l80e
    01 2500 suburban 8.1/4l80e

  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    6,343
    For most places it's pretty much 10% E year round, in which case it doesn't really matter. I'd leave it at 14.68 because it will make more sense to what you're used to. 12:1 with stoich being 14.68 and 12:1 with stoich being 14.1 are different, which will make your head hurt.