Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: L76 to LS9 Cam - Results If Interested.

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner BigDaddyCool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    767

    L76 to LS9 Cam - Results If Interested.

    I thought I'd come back with some results on my stock L76 CAM to LS9 N/A cam swap results. This is comparing the BEST runs of each over 6 months based on the engine torque feedback (yes might be out for the LS9 cam but will still provide an idea).

    - Long story short, dont fit it. Go a LS3 or even a LS7 if your fitting a stock GM cam to replace yours.

    2009 Holden Commodore VE SS (RAMJet, Overdrive Balancer, Upgraded Alternator, FlexFuel, HSV Headers, 200Cell HiFlow Cats, X Pipe - Stock Rear Mufflers)
    L76 CAM Stock: 260KW @ 5700RPM / 517NM @ 4400RPM
    L76 CAM Tuned: 285KW @ 6400RPM / 550NM @ 3800-4000RPM (all mods)
    LS9 CAM - Initial Base Tune: (table copying) before tuning : 295KW @ 6200RPM / 500NM @ 4600RPM (KR)
    LS9 CAM Final Result: 310KW @ 6300RPM / 510NM @ 4600-4800RPM (No KR)

    LS9 has a massive loss of torque over the stock cam under 4500RPM:

    Estimate Loss:
    500 -20nm
    1000 -40nm
    1500 -50nm
    2000 -90nm
    2500 -90nm
    3000 -100 to 130nm
    3500 -100 to 130nm
    4000 -85nm
    4500 0nm
    5000 0nm
    5500 +10nm
    6000 +45nm
    6250 +50nm

    Once I get the car dynoed I'll post before and after dyno sheets. The car is an noticably worse when towing now. I'm going to upgrade the diff from the 2.92 to 3.27 to help deal with the lack of torque down low and to help get it off the line.

    0-100KM/H - No time difference (5.6 - 6.3 sec - tune timed from initial throttle response). 0-60KM/H no time difference (3.4 to 3.6 sec approx). I suspect above these speeds the LS9 cam may come into play. It does seem to breathe alot better flat out the faster you go so a dyno wont really show it's full power output.

    The good news.... uses roughly the same amount of fuel, little more if your trying to reach it's power @ 4500RPM. It's better to drive in the wet due to missing some torque and it's better on your tyres.

    You can tell by the manifold pressure etc that it's designed for a supercharger. Basically it cant get the air out of the manifold because the LSA is so wide, it needs a superchargers pressure to force it's hand so to speak with that cam.

    What you commonly see on this cam is the air stuck in the manifold so the MAF will have reversion on a WOT run .... because it cant get the air out. It's only a small amount so I'm hoping changing the diff will aid in getting the air moving and the cam rotating.

    For me it will be more interesting to see if the diff improves airflow by removing the constipation side of things.

    It generally idles fairly nicely but cold start did need a fair bit of work. And for general everyday driving it's pretty much the same..... bit slower off the line marginally.... the diff should fix that. Overall I'm happy with it, I wanted top end..... so I have the option of using it rather then just running out of power.

    With the diff I should be able to live with it.

    If you do decide to do the LS9. My advice is.... do the lighter valves (I didnt do). Upgrade to 1.85 rockers and upgrade the diff by one or two ratio's. But ultimately you could do the same with the LS7 cam which would be better suited and truth be told the LS3 cam could probably match the LS7 cam at the top with enough work on the tune.

    -----
    L76 Camshaft 200/208 0.472 0.479 116.75 LSA
    LS9 Camshaft 211/230 0.558/0.552 122.5 LSA
    Last edited by BigDaddyCool; 09-01-2017 at 10:56 PM.
    2017 Toyota Kluger - 10.1" Android Custom Head Unit, Rockford Fosgate Speakers, 85kg Roof Racks. Prev: 2009 Cammed VE SS Sedan, DOD Delete, 210/218 550', RAMJet OTR, HiFlowCats, IQ System, Amp/Speakers.

  2. #2
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Denham Springs, LA
    Posts
    146
    Interesting results - thanks for sharing.

  3. #3
    Tuning Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Franklin, NC / Gainesville, Ga
    Posts
    6,783
    Do you know your original cam specs vs the ls9 cam specs - I haven't seen any from a cam reader to know the specs for sure... I'm actually surprised with the higher lsa that your gaining the power up top that you are, so it must have a decent amount of duration and a touch more lift... Guess I could go do some digging and get the cam specs...
    2010 Vette Stock Bottom LS3 - LS2 APS Twin Turbo Kit, Trick Flow Heads and Custom Cam - 12psi - 714rwhp and 820rwtq / 100hp Nitrous Shot starting at 3000 rpms - 948rwhp and 1044rwtq still on 93
    2011 Vette Cam Only Internal Mod in stock LS3 -- YSI @ 18psi - 811rwhp on 93 / 926rwhp on E60 & 1008rwhp with a 50 shot of nitrous all through a 6L80

    ~Greg Huggins~
    Remote Tuning Available at gh[email protected]
    Mobile Tuning Available for North Georgia and WNC

  4. #4
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    IRAN
    Posts
    21
    L76/L98 cam is 200/208 0.472 0.479

  5. #5
    Did you degree the cam when it was installed?
    GM retards the cam timing on almost all the factory cams.This is done for emissions.
    The LS-9 cam is made with a 1* retard (pin location),the LS-7 cam is retarded 3 *.
    Except for a 1.5* of LSA difference and lift the LS-9 and LS-7 cams are almost identical.
    If you add the slop in the timing chain and the location of the crank key,timing gear pin location.
    You could be over 4* retarded.This is why most A/M cams are ground 4* advanced.
    I think that this is the reason you had a loss of torque with your install. And gained upper rpm power only.
    Retardng the cam moves the power band higher in the rpm range at the expense of low rpm tq.
    There are plenty of magazine tests of the LS-9 cam vs a stock cam that gain 50 lb ft of torque (low rpm) with an increase in(high rpm) hp.
    Last edited by Earwax; 09-02-2017 at 08:24 PM.

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner BigDaddyCool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    767
    Notch to notch as you install most cams? The LS9 was listed as not retarded or advanced. My stock cam came out notch to notch, new one when in notch to notch (cam marking to gear marking).

    http://www.lingenfelter.com/PDFdownloads/12638427.pdf so it is retarded -1.0 but again fitted correctly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Earwax View Post
    Did you degree the cam when it was installed?
    GM retards the cam timing on almost all the factory cams.This is done for emissions.
    The LS-9 cam is made with a 1* retard (pin location),the LS-7 cam is retarded 3 *.
    Except for a 1.5* of LSA difference and lift the LS-9 and LS-7 cams are almost identical.
    If you add the slop in the timing chain and the location of the crank key,timing gear pin location.
    You could be over 4* retarded.This is why most A/M cams are ground 4* advanced.
    I think that this is the reason you had a loss of torque with your install. And gained upper rpm power only.
    Retardng the cam moves the power band higher in the rpm range at the expense of low rpm tq.
    There are plenty of magazine tests of the LS-9 cam vs a stock cam that gain 50 lb ft of torque (low rpm) with an increase in(high rpm) hp.
    Last edited by BigDaddyCool; 09-02-2017 at 09:27 PM.
    2017 Toyota Kluger - 10.1" Android Custom Head Unit, Rockford Fosgate Speakers, 85kg Roof Racks. Prev: 2009 Cammed VE SS Sedan, DOD Delete, 210/218 550', RAMJet OTR, HiFlowCats, IQ System, Amp/Speakers.

  7. #7
    The reason you degree a cam is due to the possibility of the of the actual cam lobes position being wrong ,even with the timing marks aligned on the gears.
    As stated, the timing gears, chain, cam,crank can all affect the cam to crank position. With out checking , you will never know if the cam is installed correctly.
    If it is degreed and is only 1* out of spec, no change is needed. Remember, as the chain wears and stretches the cam timing retards.
    Here is one of many links on degreeing a cam.
    Link:http://www.cranecams.com/bulletins_listview.php?s_id=5