I'll Just come out and say it...
I've been using the competetion for about 7 years now to tune GM gas vehicles. Lately I've been frustrated with them and considering coming over to HP Tuners. I am not completly new to this software, I have had the demo version for a couple years. Also I have a good friend with the setup and we have compared notes from time to time. I haven't been able to find a clear answer to some of my questions so I thought I'd just ask straight forward, does anybody have experience with both systems, and what do you think about them?
Heres some things to keep in mind:
*I only deal with GM gas vehicles, Gen3, 4 and moving on to gen5 now.
*I don't necesarilly tune a lot of stock vehicles, its 95% engine swaps so that's where my concerns lie.
*My biggest complaints with the other guys is the e38 ecms...it seams some functions don't always work even though they appear to have been changed in the tune. Discrete fan settings come to mind, I've been told HPT doesn't have an issue with this, true or not???
*I Flash or tune approx 10 cars/ecms per month, I'd most likely jump right into a stream license, I'd need to check into that...
I don't expect or want a bunch of product bashing but if you can simply tell me the things you like better about HPT that would be great. Either in ease of function, or just black and white issues of function availability, etc.
In my head I have 2 hang-ups about HPTs,
1) the credits system seems confusing compared to what I'm coming from
2) I hear that it is difficult to change vins around for a swap. (theres plenty of times when I need to take a tune, swap the trans segment, and stuff it into a completly different ecm, is this a problem)
Please feel free to ease my mind about these 2 issues.
Also, It looks like some new hardware/software was just released, maybe now is the time to jump in! Thanks for reading all this and putting up with the stupid questions.