Ok so I feel like I have a decent grasp on the torque model but just wanted to start a thread on it again. I have read a ton of stuff that seems like Ghuggins and Higgs are always on. I have seen people just say to raise the airmass a b c d. And then I see people that suggest actually editing the torque model under the edit tab. Which when it gets edited it changes the airmass a rpm a map a ect under the coefficients tab. My question is. Let?s use for example a cammed g8 with headers. I always try to keep the maf curve above stock. Which raises delivered engine torque. The scanner shows a increase in delivered engine torque and the shifts feel good and hit my commanded shift time around .200.at wot. But I am curious if I am losing anything when it comes to how it drives ect by not correcting the torque model on a cam bolt on car. And if so how should I get it correct. It seems like on the gen 4 stuff the only way to do it is log engine torque and set it up to mimic the torque model table and filter through the -10-40 timing points. Or am I better by logging engine torque and comparing it to the torque model and multiplying the percentage it?s off to the airmass and map tables. The reason I?m asking is because if I multiply the airmass tables by 15-20% my delivered torque goes up into unrealistic ranges with the maf curve raised above stock already.