Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: CL proportional airflow stock table differences

  1. #1
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    32

    CL proportional airflow stock table differences

    Not really expecting anyone knows the answer to this, but anyway...
    closed loop proportional airflow - why is there such a big difference between 98-00 fbody, 01-02 fbody, and 00-02 vette?
    98-00 range: 128-822
    00 vette range: 16-122
    01-02 fbody range: 128-401
    02 vette range: 16-50

    (These are all stock table values.) Those are pretty large differences, so why?

    There are also differences in the O2 rich/lean vs airflow, even though I'm pretty sure that at least the fbodys all used the same O2 sensors, same cats.

  2. #2
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    98
    It was just GM giving the vette a 'unique' tune. They also changed the multipliers so it all comes out roughly the same in the end.

  3. #3
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    32
    You're right, the vette multipliers changed a lot also, that one was a bad example. The fbody multipliers are the same though, 98-00 vs 01-02, but the max airflow values are different by 2X. I've never known how to set this table since the "help" directions say it depends partly on injector size, and I have 01 injectors in a 00.

  4. #4
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    98
    Neither of them are brilliant, but if I had to choose between them... I'd choose the later model settings.

    Ah heck, it's christmas... PM me if you want me to dial that in for you.