Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Load with failed Maf on 3V - What values to take from log ?

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner f.creek-ranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    569

    Load with failed Maf on 3V - What values to take from log ?

    After install the eforce charger soft, the lwfm table is unused, by diabled the anticipation.
    Now I want to use this feature and log the load.
    What Values should I use - max, min or average to calculate fuel?

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    350
    RPM vs TPS, use the same values as the failed maf table, log absolute load. Same values into maf failure load (IMRC open) since you have no charge motion plates

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner f.creek-ranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    569
    Thanks Ben, thats what I ll do.

    But what logged values should I use for the table.

    Is the table for the max load or the average load that i have logged?

    At this time I use the transient from the GT500 to keep the AFR at 14.6 until I know the right values and figured it out.

    It seems the GT500 has no lwfm - the transient value are higher and the time period is much longer for transient.

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner f.creek-ranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    569
    Ah, by the way....

    do you know, if I can use the same column axis labels like the GT500 ?

    the GT table MAP inHg only goes to 30 whereas the GT500 goes up to 68 inHg. But will the higher values are accepted by the ECU ?

    Saleen and Edelbrock uses no other values than the stock from ECU

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner veeefour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,711
    Quote Originally Posted by f.creek-ranch View Post
    Saleen and Edelbrock uses no other values than the stock from ECU
    There any many ways to kick a cat - you can also "butcher" that little fella just saying....

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner f.creek-ranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    569
    I was wrong....Roush uses higher values for inHG in transient table in the axis than stock - but its the GT500 ECM...so it should work - ill give it a try.
    Last edited by f.creek-ranch; 09-02-2019 at 03:12 PM.