Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Rail pressure and timing

  1. #1

    Rail pressure and timing

    If I begin to adjust rail pressures will that effect my timing? My enitial thought is no, because all we are doing is inject more fuel volume in the same amount of duration.

    Not sure why but messing with my timing intimidates me.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Yes it plays a role in timing. If you are commanding 100mm3 at 100mPa it takes 1840 microseconds to inject that 100mm3 of fuel. Now if you increase pressure to 110mPa it 1740 microseconds to inject that same amount of fuel. It doesn?t inject the same amount of fuel in the same amount of time if you increase or decrease fuel. It will change where in crank angle degrees your injection ends. Increasing and decreasing pressure also affects things like in cylinder pressure and heat and atomization of the fuel that with the change in crank angle degrees of where the injection ends plus other factors it can throw your beginning of injection out of place from where it should be for optimum results.

  3. #3
    Oh man, Timing is where all the fun is! At 130-140mm3 and 2000rpm, put timing at 8* then at 130-140mm3 and 3000rpm put timing at 18 or 20*, do a linear function between them, then smooth the table. This is assuming you're still at stockish to 2200uS duration. This will pep the truck right up.
    I've found 2200uS, 22* timing and 24k Rail to be a great 70hp 150tq tune. Runs clean and tows great. That's my go to when someone wants a tow tune.

  4. #4
    Thanks Jim and Dom. Appreciate the support you guys offer to the forum!
    After looking at the factory timing map and comparing it to dom’s suggestion. I realized these trucks came primarily with negative timing. Why is that? What is the purpose/benefits of it?
    Also Jim I’m beginning to play around with your timing calculator�� Thanks again

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Your welcome. Sorry the timing calculator tables are rotated to match hp tuners tables, I keep meaning to get to reworking it but got so much on my to do list. Eventually it?ll happen. Just keep in mind the calculator is more for a visual representation of injection cycle, like how many crank angle degrees it?s spread over, when it begins, when it ends. There is no magic number for where your timing must be at. Again, there is NO magic number. Some people are hard dead set on 50/50 split or whatever and insist on using the calculator to get things like a 50/50 split or 60/40 split or whatever, do not get tied up in this mindset.

    The stock tuning you see has mainly to do with emission standards of that time.

  6. #6
    The negative timing does help a lot with smoke control as well. I use a lot of negative (ATDC) timing in the spool up range of the map, it will keep smoke down while putting heat into the turbine to help spool the turbo. The 04.5-07 pistons are arguably the worst of the cummins pistons for smoke.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    doesn?t take a whole lot on the 04.5-07 to start producing smoke

  8. #8
    Is it safe to run 48% split on my entire map for my base map? Then eventually adjust the low load and low rpm side of things as I go?

  9. #9
    My basic plan at the moment is to smooth my rail pressure map. Leave the duration alone (possibly a bump in the lower right corner) then imput to a calculator @48% and see where I'm at. I have already changed some limiters for fuel and rpm.

  10. #10
    I would leave the cruise and low end stuff where it's at. 48% at cruise isn't going to be enough timing for optimal fuel mileage. If and when I use a calculator it's only to set timing in the top end. Smooth out the table and then do the calculator for the top end and see where it puts you.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Start with stock, raise timing a few degrees in a small spot and observe effects and how it runs in that spot. Lower timing below stock a few degrees in the exact same spot and observe the effects and how it runs. Work your way through different spots getting it to where you like how it runs. Just go through the process with rail pressure, timing, etc till you get what you like and it runs good. Throw the timing calculator away. It does NOT tell you where timing needs to be except for where YOU tell it to be. It will not tell you the right amount of timing needed for x sized injectors at x amount of pressure with x sized turbo and the list can go on and on.

  12. #12
    Thanks guys! I will plug away at it for a bit. One quick question, is their a faster way to flash the ecu? It takes my laptop 10min.

  13. #13
    No sir, the CM848 takes forever to flash.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Yep, flash time is what it is.

  15. #15
    Advanced Tuner JaegerWrenching's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Albuquerque New Mexico
    Posts
    465
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim P View Post
    Start with stock, raise timing a few degrees in a small spot and observe effects and how it runs in that spot. Lower timing below stock a few degrees in the exact same spot and observe the effects and how it runs. Work your way through different spots getting it to where you like how it runs. Just go through the process with rail pressure, timing, etc till you get what you like and it runs good. Throw the timing calculator away. It does NOT tell you where timing needs to be except for where YOU tell it to be. It will not tell you the right amount of timing needed for x sized injectors at x amount of pressure with x sized turbo and the list can go on and on.
    This is the best piece of advice for timing. I have tried used timing calculators and values that big tuners use on a stock truck and swear by with absolutely awful results, there's just too many factors at play to warrant a "Perfect timing number". Every single engine will like different timing values even if they were built on the same day by the same guy using the exact same parts.

  16. #16
    Advanced Tuner MAIDENCR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Quebec,canada
    Posts
    207
    In my tune on my 03....all the cruise area (1000rpm and over/65mm3 under)is around 100% btdc....bottom left of table is on megative side to help spool up and bottom right(high rpm/load) is arround 60% btdc
    But 04.5-07 engine are different...almost always close to 0 or minus side

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Everyone is always wanting to use percentages before top dead center, forget that. Every truck likes something different from the next, everyone?s setup is different, everyone?s operating conditions are different. What works well on one truck doesn?t always work well on another of the same build.

  18. #18
    Jim, in your post #11 you talked about changing my timing in a small spot and seeing how that effects things. Can you elaborate on what you mean by a “small spot” ?
    Thanks

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Just pick a spot you operate in at steady state, rpm/total mm3 commanded. Say 1800-2000 rpms and between 35-45mm3 total commanded, make a small change to whatever and see what happens. If you lower rail pressure it?ll cause injection duration to be longer for the same amount of fuel, timing will need to be raised slightly to keep combustion in the optimal position and vise versa if you raise rail pressure.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    1,772
    Log before the change and after the change and log everything. You want to look for changes that net you less throttle input, less engine load, less injected fuel, etc to maintain the same speed, this will indicate you are in the sweet spot or close to for optimizing torque output this better fuel economy.