Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: 2005 GTO E40 Correct 2 bar MAP PN??

  1. #1
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774

    2005 GTO E40 Correct 2 bar MAP PN??

    Greeting...

    Currently tuning a 2005 GTO with...

    LS9 cam
    Maggie M112 blower

    No matter what I do, whether I load a 1-bar or 2-bar OS, when running 2-bar map sensor (GM 12615136), the car barely will start. And when I do get it started, the scanner says its idling at 104 KPA. Snap the throttle and it comes down to maybe 70 KPA and back to 104 it goes. I used the linear and offset setting from a 2005 or 2006 Cobalt SS. If I put stock settings back in the computer (even with the 2 bar map), the car starts and idles fine. And shows around 40-50 KPA.

    What gives? I want the ECM to AT LEAST know the proper KPA being supplied to the engine. Ive NEVER had this issue with E38s (1-bar or 2.5-bar).

    Thanks in advance!
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  2. #2
    I'm running the 2bar OS...I'm just n/a, running speed density. I'm using the stock map sensor and I put the stock settings back in after I applied the 2 bar.
    Map linear..94.43kpa
    linearB...31.48kpa
    offset... 10.33kpa
    2005 gto A4
    Darton sleeved 427, prc ls3 heads, custom cam 243/257
    Fti 3400 triple disc convertor
    553/555 N/A 839/823 nitrous on hub dyno

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by 13qtr View Post
    I'm running the 2bar OS...I'm just n/a, running speed density. I'm using the stock map sensor and I put the stock settings back in after I applied the 2 bar.
    Map linear..94.43kpa
    linearB...31.48kpa
    offset... 10.33kpa
    I would run this car in SD BUT we have to pass emissions in MD so failing the MAF is not an option. But since this is a boosted car, I would like the ECM to at least be able to measure manifiold pressure. The previous tuner left this car with a 1-bar OS and map. Its only running 7 psi but the owner swapped in the LS9 cam and a set of 60LB injectors. Ive got the scaling and everything down but I cannot figure out the weird KPA issue in the scanner. I have the stock sttings and map sensor in now and the car runs fine...
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  4. #4
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,571
    The Cobalt 3-wire sensor is actually the baro sensor, at least that's what its called in the wiring diagram. The MAP sensor is a 4-wire thingie with the IAT built it.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by blindsquirrel View Post
    The Cobalt 3-wire sensor is actually the baro sensor, at least that's what its called in the wiring diagram. The MAP sensor is a 4-wire thingie with the IAT built it.
    OK. So which one is the correct one to use? GM #12615136 or AC Delco #213-1631? Im so confused...
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774
    Wait... So This would need an old style brick map to work properly? The 12615136 wont work because its a Baro sensor? Hmmm... THIS IS SO CRAZY!
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  7. #7
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,571
    You can use any sensor that has a max Linear of less than the hard limit of 256kpa, and only sensors with a positive Offset.

    What settings have you tried with it? Apparently it SHOULD be correct with 200/8.33. You can check this by setting the tune to the stock values, plug in the stock 1-bar sensor, key-on and record the MAP value. Right quick before the weather changes swap to the Cobalt sensor using 200/8.33, key-on and see if the MAP reads the same.

  8. #8
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,571
    FYI the 4-wire part with integrated IAT requires 270.59/-3.30 (per a 2006 Cobalt stock tune), won't work with the odd-duck E40.

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by blindsquirrel View Post
    You can use any sensor that has a max Linear of less than the hard limit of 256kpa, and only sensors with a positive Offset.

    What settings have you tried with it? Apparently it SHOULD be correct with 200/8.33. You can check this by setting the tune to the stock values, plug in the stock 1-bar sensor, key-on and record the MAP value. Right quick before the weather changes swap to the Cobalt sensor using 200/8.33, key-on and see if the MAP reads the same.
    Can you recommend a part number? Or a car that one came from?
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  10. #10
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,571
    What have you been using for linear/offset with the 12615136? Sure it's pinned right? It should 'work' if you give it the right settings and have it wired right. The 4-wire sensor is the one that just flat out can't be used with the E40.

    Honestly given the E40's limitations there's one best answer: https://www.dpecorvettes.com/2.5-bar-map-sensor.html

  11. #11
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,571
    From the first post:
    Quote Originally Posted by jaydubb71 View Post
    when running 2-bar map sensor (GM 12615136), the car barely will start.
    [...]
    I used the linear and offset setting from a 2005 or 2006 Cobalt SS.
    But see, the 12615136, being the baro sensor, isn't the sensor in the Cobalt's tune file at Airflow > General > MAP Characteristics, those numbers are dealing with the Cobalt's actual MAP sensor, the 4-wire thing with the integrated IAT. Different sensor than the 12615136, there's no settings available to edit or even display in the Cobalt tune for the baro sensor, it's just fixed at whatever it is.

    And anyway you can't enter either 270.59 or -3.30 in an E40 file as they're both outside the hard-coded limits. If you try it the 270.59 changes itself to the max allowed of 256 as soon as you click over to the next box.

    Apparently other people who have used the 12615136 baro sensor as a MAP with the E40 have used settings of 200/8.33 and found them to work.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by blindsquirrel View Post
    From the first post:


    But see, the 12615136, being the baro sensor, isn't the sensor in the Cobalt's tune file at Airflow > General > MAP Characteristics, those numbers are dealing with the Cobalt's actual MAP sensor, the 4-wire thing with the integrated IAT. Different sensor than the 12615136, there's no settings available to edit or even display in the Cobalt tune for the baro sensor, it's just fixed at whatever it is.

    And anyway you can't enter either 270.59 or -3.30 in an E40 file as they're both outside the hard-coded limits. If you try it the 270.59 changes itself to the max allowed of 256 as soon as you click over to the next box.

    Apparently other people who have used the 12615136 baro sensor as a MAP with the E40 have used settings of 200/8.33 and found them to work.
    OK. I THINK I tried those settings with the 12615136. I will try it again.

    Thanks!
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner Lakegoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,456
    Yep, 200/8.33 or 200/8.00. I have been running that 5136 sensor for years
    2000 Camaro SS 2015 L83 port injected, Whipple 3.0, 4L80E, 8.8 Ford
    2013 Silverado 5.3, 6L80k 8.8

  14. #14
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    35
    The 2 bar is ACDelco 213-1631 or GM 12615136. I'm running an LS3 intake in my 2005 GTO. I had to make a little flat plate with a hole to mount it to the manifold. The hole diameter is larger in the LS3 manifold so I had to double up O rings to seal it up. Wiring is plug and play.

    Map Characteristics for this sensor are:

    MAP Sensor Linear = 200.00 kPa
    MAP Sensor Linear B = 66.66 kPa
    MAP Sensor Offset = 10.33 kPa

  15. #15
    Senior Tuner Lakegoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,456
    Offset is not 10.33
    2000 Camaro SS 2015 L83 port injected, Whipple 3.0, 4L80E, 8.8 Ford
    2013 Silverado 5.3, 6L80k 8.8

  16. #16
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Lakegoat View Post
    Offset is not 10.33
    Please correct me.

  17. #17
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,571
    12615136 is 200/8.33.

    I don't know of any sensor with the actual specs of 200/10.33. I think those numbers are just generic placeholders they chose as defaults for the custom OS. 200 = 2 bar, and the 10.33 is nothing but a carryover from the stock 1 bar sensors (94.43/10.33).

  18. #18
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    35
    I must have jacked the math up. I just ran it again with the Delphi data and come up with 200/8 based on y = .025x - .2 on the data from their print. I see people using 8.33 now but the data from the print comes up with 8 as the x intercept. Unless I goofed it up again.

    Delphi 2 bar MAP Print and Data.pdf

    Delphi 2 bar graph.png
    Quote Originally Posted by blindsquirrel View Post
    12615136 is 200/8.33.

    I don't know of any sensor with the actual specs of 200/10.33. I think those numbers are just generic placeholders they chose as defaults for the custom OS. 200 = 2 bar, and the 10.33 is nothing but a carryover from the stock 1 bar sensors (94.43/10.33).

  19. #19
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Waldorf MD
    Posts
    774
    Update:

    Went back to 1-bar OS and 1-bar MAP and tuned it...
    Daily Driver= 2003 BMW 330xi
    Weekend Cruiser= 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Vararam, TSP LS3 N/A Stage 1, OBX, CTS-V converter, MagnaFlows w/ J-Pipes, 160 t-stat)
    Project Car= 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS (LQ4 w/ Gen 4 Rods, LS3 heads, turbo...)
    Truck= 2007 Chevy Silverado 1500 LT LY5 4x4

  20. #20
    I run the dpe 2.5 in my e40 boosted 2005 gto. It works great