Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: LT4 Cam position Desired Angle 2017 vs 2019

  1. #1
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South FL
    Posts
    1,366

    LT4 Cam position Desired Angle 2017 vs 2019

    Any know why Z06 vs ZL1 tunes have different desired intake cam angles?


    top 2017 ZO6
    2017z06.PNG

    bottom 2019 Zl1
    2019zl1.PNG
    Last edited by TriPinTaZ; 01-26-2020 at 01:23 PM.
    [email protected]
    Owner/GM Calibrator
    Gen V Specialist - C7 Corvette, Gen6 Camaro & CTS-V3

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    254
    power output control? vehicle dynamic delta?

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner IARLLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    942
    Yeah, that Z06 looks to be limiting cylinder pressure at lower RPM for some reason.

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South FL
    Posts
    1,366
    That is actually increasing cylinder pressure. The lower the number the less degrees of cam retard. The point is, it seems like the OEM tunes for ZL1s vs Z06's are different in regards to desired cam angles at WOT.
    [email protected]
    Owner/GM Calibrator
    Gen V Specialist - C7 Corvette, Gen6 Camaro & CTS-V3

  5. #5
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    254
    maybe trans related? ZL1 auto?

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner IARLLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by TriPinTaZ View Post
    That is actually increasing cylinder pressure. The lower the number the less degrees of cam retard. The point is, it seems like the OEM tunes for ZL1s vs Z06's are different in regards to desired cam angles at WOT.
    Yep. No doubt they are different.

    I agree that the lower number/less cam retard. The way I have always understood it, advancing the cam at low RPM will get you more cylinder fill/pressure...and the opposite, retarding the cam at low RPM will lose you some low RPM cylinder fill/pressure...or retard it even further and get the EGR affect. The Z06 has 6-7 degrees of cam retard from off-idle up to 3600 RPM. That is why I wrote that the Z06 looks to be limiting cylinder pressure at low RPM. You are saying that retarding the cam at low RPM increases cylinder pressure?

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South FL
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by orange ss View Post
    maybe trans related? ZL1 auto?
    Both manuals

    Quote Originally Posted by IARLLC View Post
    Yep. No doubt they are different.

    I agree that the lower number/less cam retard. The way I have always understood it, advancing the cam at low RPM will get you more cylinder fill/pressure...and the opposite, retarding the cam at low RPM will lose you some low RPM cylinder fill/pressure...or retard it even further and get the EGR affect. The Z06 has 6-7 degrees of cam retard from off-idle up to 3600 RPM. That is why I wrote that the Z06 looks to be limiting cylinder pressure at low RPM. You are saying that retarding the cam at low RPM increases cylinder pressure?

    No I am not, I'm talking about the area before peak torque and into peak torqueat WOT where the Z06 advances the cam more than the ZL1 meaning the Z06 is bleeding off less cylinder pressure compared the to ZL1. I wondered if anyone knew why the tunes were different in this area if the engines are the same. The Camaro does have a different exhaust manifold and intake. Maybe they needed to reduce cylinder pressures?
    Last edited by TriPinTaZ; 02-01-2020 at 10:12 AM.
    [email protected]
    Owner/GM Calibrator
    Gen V Specialist - C7 Corvette, Gen6 Camaro & CTS-V3

  8. #8
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Miami,Fl.
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by TriPinTaZ View Post
    Both manuals




    No I am not, I'm talking about the area before peak torque and into peak torqueat WOT where the Z06 advances the cam more than the ZL1 meaning the Z06 is bleeding off less cylinder pressure compared the to ZL1. I wondered if anyone knew why the tunes were different in this area if the engines are the same. The Camaro does have a different exhaust manifold and intake. Maybe they needed to reduce cylinder pressures?
    That's the only thing I can think of as well. Maybe the Camaros build more boost because of the added restriction.
    2023 Ford Maverick 2.0T AWD

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner IARLLC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by TriPinTaZ View Post
    Both manuals




    No I am not, I'm talking about the area before peak torque and into peak torqueat WOT where the Z06 advances the cam more than the ZL1 meaning the Z06 is bleeding off less cylinder pressure compared the to ZL1. I wondered if anyone knew why the tunes were different in this area if the engines are the same. The Camaro does have a different exhaust manifold and intake. Maybe they needed to reduce cylinder pressures?
    I see what you are talking about now. I was looking at the way the Z06 retards several more degrees than the ZL1 right off idle.

    As far as the massive dip after that...Yeah, I'd have to agree it is probably related to the exhaust restriction. Those ZL1 manifolds don't flow nearly as well as the Z06s.

  10. #10
    Advanced Tuner JaegerWrenching's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Albuquerque New Mexico
    Posts
    465
    Quote Originally Posted by IARLLC View Post
    I see what you are talking about now. I was looking at the way the Z06 retards several more degrees than the ZL1 right off idle.

    As far as the massive dip after that...Yeah, I'd have to agree it is probably related to the exhaust restriction. Those ZL1 manifolds don't flow nearly as well as the Z06s.
    It could also be the heavier weight of the zl1 making more load sooner at the same cam timing. This also wouldn't be real apparent on a dyno as loading them both the same amount would yield the same result on the same engine.