that last 5% might be a bit more work not out of the woods yet
The scaling on the frpp tune tq inverse works when applying to the stock os but the frpp os or tune must have some scalers in other parts of the tune to account for this, things we cant see. The end result is lower loads for the same throttle, IMRC stays closed longer and decel gets hung in tq based decel instead of tipout limit. putting the lower load axis labels back to the stock settings (example from frpp=50ftlbs back to stock =37ftlbs) resolves start up and idle issues and some of the decel but not perfect. and leaving this hacked up inverse axis doesnt make me feel comfortable for hard use.
the scaling is a clean 35% increase in tq on the inverse axis. applying a 35% reduction to the DD with stock inverse axis ftlbs does not work as expected though and tq errors and surging crop up again.
i started logging same gear,rpm, pedal position on both tunes. logs attached.
frpp2 steady throttle.hpl Stock OS steady throttle.hpl
how is the dash vacuum gauge fed from the tune? frpp tune is pretty near correct maybe 1-3 inhg off, stock o/s with this tb is off by 5-7inhg.
also noticing the stock os will not go above 10.5inhg on the etc model. how would these be adjusted? throttle angles end up very similar as the blade opens in both tunes