Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: Question about PE

  1. #21
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    I have it selected to be disabled since I don?t have any cats. But couldn?t find anywhere else where I needed to disable its tables

  2. #22
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    124
    could you post your tune

  3. #23

  4. #24
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    Think maybe It's because my Accelerator Pedal Position and Commanded Throttle Actual don't match. Acc Pedal is 99.6 but Commanded Throttle stays in the 60's%

    I was trying to clean up my WOT VE at lunch so I made a hit.

    7-24-20 1.hpl

  5. #25
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    124
    Your alcohol PE table ramps from 1.20 to 1.247. When flex fuel is enabled those tables blend together. Also, it appears that you're just logging the wrong TPS channel, but I'm not sure on that one, just feel like I was logging the SAE one last time I had my laptop in the car. I'd try another one just to be sure.

  6. #26
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    So would you lean out the alcohol tables. Maybe .98??

    I try the other channel tomorrow

  7. #27
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    124
    No. That's far too lean for E85 haha. Just make it the same as your gas table, its lean enough already.

  8. #28
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,559
    I have my gas PE set to 1.175 and the alcohol set to 1.130 above 4,000-4,500rpm. It blends it nicely depending on what I have in the tank.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  9. #29
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    Lol
    No I meant to multiple it by .98

    So I?m trying to take 2% out of it

  10. #30
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    5FDP

    It?s 1.175 PE .825 lambda and isn?t that way to rich for a NA truck. Don?t you have a newer 5.3?

  11. #31
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,559
    I run 89 octane or E85 so I blend it from 12.5 to 13.0 AFR. That's like .85 to .89 lambda.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  12. #32
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    That makes since

  13. #33
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    124
    Using windows calculator, 1 / 1.175 = .851. You don't subtract the portion above 1, it's not a direct relationship like that.

  14. #34
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    Well I did not realize that. Thanks

  15. #35
    Advanced Tuner Ghostnotes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    471
    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Charles View Post
    That?s never how I would set one up....
    Okay so how?

    I'm targeting a certain PE ratio of 12.1 from about 3600 on up.Below that are stock numbers and figured are pretty safe. So instead of a sharp spike, I smoothed the ramp in. Unless like the stock, I should lean it out a little but im boosted and was going to leave it that way until i see what it does on the scan.
    Last edited by Ghostnotes; 07-26-2020 at 09:55 AM.
    I always tune VVE....
    2016 C7 M7 Z51
    Callies ultra billet crank
    Callies ultra billet rods
    Diamond pistons
    Jhonson high speed lifters
    Ported and polished headwork
    Custom cam
    YSi-V7

  16. #36
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    South FL
    Posts
    1,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostnotes View Post
    Okay so how?

    I'm targeting a certain PE ratio of 12.1 from about 3600 on up.Below that are stock numbers and figured are pretty safe. So instead of a sharp spike, I smoothed the ramp in. Unless like the stock, I should lean it out a little but im boosted and was going to leave it that way until i see what it does on the scan.

    IMO

    You might find you make a little more torque at 11.8 from 3000-5200, then 11.9 at 5600 and 12.0 till redline on a boosted application. The dyno is really where to dial this in. Basically you want slightly richer before and up to peak torque and then slightly leaner after peak torque to redline. There isn't a ton of power to be made this way vs 12.1 across the board but I'm more speaking of the slope. Some cars will want the slope leaner like 12.0-12.3, some will like 11.8-12.1. Just depends on the setup. But the basic principle still applies.
    Last edited by TriPinTaZ; 07-26-2020 at 11:45 AM.
    [email protected]
    Owner/GM Calibrator
    Gen V Specialist - C7 Corvette, Gen6 Camaro & CTS-V3

  17. #37
    Advanced Tuner Ghostnotes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    471
    Quote Originally Posted by TriPinTaZ View Post
    IMO

    You might find you make a little more torque at 11.8 from 3000-5200, then 11.9 at 5600 and 12.0 till redline on a boosted application. The dyno is really where to dial this in. Basically you want slightly richer before and up to peak torque and then slightly leaner after peak torque to redline. There isn't a ton of power to be made this way vs 12.1 across the board but I'm more speaking of the slope. Some cars will want the slope leaner like 12.0-12.3, some will like 11.8-12.1. Just depends on the setup. But the basic principle still applies.
    Gotcha


    I had it set that way and with my setup it seems happy, no knock or black smoke. It will go to the dyno now for polishing for sure (see my post from today). I had it set to 11.8 for quite a while and i swear in 4th gear cursing it feels more responsive and smoother now. I'll give the above a shot though and lean it a little up top.It does like the slope i put in.

    Thanks.
    I always tune VVE....
    2016 C7 M7 Z51
    Callies ultra billet crank
    Callies ultra billet rods
    Diamond pistons
    Jhonson high speed lifters
    Ported and polished headwork
    Custom cam
    YSi-V7

  18. #38
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    Very low regions of RPM should never should that rich.. that will just make a car launch lazy

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  19. #39
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    311
    What do you consider very low regions on a NA cammed truck. I made every thing the same 1.130 at 2,560 and above. My rookie think was I?ll usually start a wot pull around that rpm?

  20. #40
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    2 things shops that’s send me tune work all over the world often get wrong... engine doesn’t go into PE quick enough (often times in boost rigs they will be making 4-5psi and still not be in PE..

    The other is below 2k rpms they have fuel wayyy to rich (stock converter sees this from a dig) this can be closer to stoich levels

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C