Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: [email protected] 2018 mustang gt log and dragy inside

  1. #1

    [email protected] 2018 mustang gt log and dragy inside

    hi guys
    i have done my best run so far on the street - 11.3@124mph
    the car has headers and e85.

    please check my log attached, also the dragy run.

    I have noticed that im running a bit richer then commanded( maybe im monitrong wrong stuff lol?) You think that has to be addressed?
    Also any other tips you can give me to improve the time.

    Thanks,
    V.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Attached Files Attached Files
    2018 mustang gt a10 with headers and e85

  2. #2
    From what you have logged PID wise, looks good.

  3. #3
    Advanced Tuner LastPlace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    613
    post your tune

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by LastPlace View Post
    post your tune
    i do not know if that appropriate, same charge like $500 for it lol
    2018 mustang gt a10 with headers and e85

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by MaximumVelocity View Post
    From what you have logged PID wise, looks good.

    in "Closed loop lambda at WOT" table [ ecm 33784] lambda value is 0.84 and thats what im getting from log pids WB EQ Ratio Bank 1,2. But Equivalance Ratio camanded (SAE) showing me 0.86 Lambda. Please check photos attached. So why this pid showing diff info? how to find it out?
    Also from your experience what lambda should be at wot for these engines on e85 ( on the track).
    lambda.JPGdiference.JPG
    2018 mustang gt a10 with headers and e85

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner LastPlace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by ttbestas View Post
    i do not know if that appropriate, same charge like $500 for it lol
    I know exactly what you mean about it being appropriate, you wouldn’t want to give away all your hard work and knowledge to some guys on the forum begging for free hand outs.

    You’ve been here since 2008, I’m sure in that amount of time you’ve learned how to use the search function and could easily answer your own question.

  7. #7
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by ttbestas View Post
    in "Closed loop lambda at WOT" table [ ecm 33784] lambda value is 0.84 and thats what im getting from log pids WB EQ Ratio Bank 1,2. But Equivalance Ratio camanded (SAE) showing me 0.86 Lambda. Please check photos attached. So why this pid showing diff info? how to find it out?
    Also from your experience what lambda should be at wot for these engines on e85 ( on the track).
    lambda.JPGdiference.JPG
    Adjust your fueling. STFTs are 3% rich. Take away 3% of fuel in that area and that should get you to where you need to be

  8. #8
    Down low when your launching the car it needs some fuel and will help your 60ft into the 1.7 range which will knock off some time.

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    229
    MAF transfer. Work on it.
    2009.5 PBM G8 GXP M6 W/Roof-Self tune, OBX LTs, Kooks axleback, LSA blower, cam,
    Monster LT1-SC clutch, flex fuel, 12 psi [email protected] 1,800 D.A
    2007 TBSS-Self tune, bolt ons [email protected], 1,900 D.A
    1991 GMC Syclone- Self tune/catback 12.8@104, 4,200ft D.A