Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Nick Williams scalar values for 103mm LSx vs 102mm (not LTx)

  1. #1
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208

    Nick Williams scalar values for 103mm LSx vs 102mm (not LTx)

    What have you all been using for values? I have a G8 that acts really wierd. First banged my head on wall with a POS TPIS 102mm where the blade was crooked as hell and didnt seal worth a damn. Stuck a 103mm NW on it and certainly seals better but scalar values are non sense. I can use a stock scalar (4700-5100) or typical NW 102mm value of 7280 or max it out at 8190 and idle airflow values are not doing much different, read way out of wack (3 lb/min Desired Idle Air or something like that when it should be 1.3-1.4ish). Just put a scalar of 3000 (wayyyy smaller than stock) and it all seems to act normal with Idle Airflow Values falling in line??? It throws a P0606 ECM/PCM code now occasionally though
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Factory Stock 97 SS M6 13.51 @ 104.3 mph
    Stock Longblock LS1 w/ 233/238 P.S.I. Cam
    10.81 @ 126.9 Full interior, six speed on 275 radials, a decade ago

    '99 TA trunk mounted 76mm 6 Liter
    9.0s in '09 @ 153 MPH

    Turbo 5.3 Volvo 740 Wagon
    32psi and still winding out 5th on the highway somewhere

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner Lakegoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,454
    I use 7300 for a 102. So, If I put on a 103, I would use 7500 and readjust the maf and ve tables and whatever else needed adjustment.
    2000 Camaro SS 2015 L83 port injected, Whipple 3.0, 4L80E, 8.8 Ford
    2013 Silverado 5.3, 6L80k 8.8

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Lakegoat View Post
    I use 7300 for a 102. So, If I put on a 103, I would use 7500 and readjust the maf and ve tables and whatever else needed adjustment.
    The problem is that doesnt work, even remotely on this car. Like I said, its happy with values of @3000 being used
    Factory Stock 97 SS M6 13.51 @ 104.3 mph
    Stock Longblock LS1 w/ 233/238 P.S.I. Cam
    10.81 @ 126.9 Full interior, six speed on 275 radials, a decade ago

    '99 TA trunk mounted 76mm 6 Liter
    9.0s in '09 @ 153 MPH

    Turbo 5.3 Volvo 740 Wagon
    32psi and still winding out 5th on the highway somewhere

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner Lakegoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,454
    Well, you asked
    Post the tune
    2000 Camaro SS 2015 L83 port injected, Whipple 3.0, 4L80E, 8.8 Ford
    2013 Silverado 5.3, 6L80k 8.8

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208
    3000 scalar, only way data looks happy (except for P0606 coding)
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Factory Stock 97 SS M6 13.51 @ 104.3 mph
    Stock Longblock LS1 w/ 233/238 P.S.I. Cam
    10.81 @ 126.9 Full interior, six speed on 275 radials, a decade ago

    '99 TA trunk mounted 76mm 6 Liter
    9.0s in '09 @ 153 MPH

    Turbo 5.3 Volvo 740 Wagon
    32psi and still winding out 5th on the highway somewhere

  6. #6
    Senior Tuner Lakegoat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,454
    The only things that I see are Desoot is on and the IVT Terms need to be halved since it is a double stoich SD tune. I thought it would be a bad map sensor, but it reads correct on the log. Any chance the injectors have been swapped for something else? I know that I have seen this tune somewhere else---can't remenber.
    2000 Camaro SS 2015 L83 port injected, Whipple 3.0, 4L80E, 8.8 Ford
    2013 Silverado 5.3, 6L80k 8.8

  7. #7
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208
    that stuff in tune was originally done by well known guy in Florida I think. None of those things have anything to do with the way the throttle body is acting however?
    Factory Stock 97 SS M6 13.51 @ 104.3 mph
    Stock Longblock LS1 w/ 233/238 P.S.I. Cam
    10.81 @ 126.9 Full interior, six speed on 275 radials, a decade ago

    '99 TA trunk mounted 76mm 6 Liter
    9.0s in '09 @ 153 MPH

    Turbo 5.3 Volvo 740 Wagon
    32psi and still winding out 5th on the highway somewhere

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    If fueling isn’t right airflow with the TB won’t be... what is engine TQ at idle?

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Central, LA
    Posts
    737
    Leave scalar stock for the 103s

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208
    Ben even after getting fuel trims within couple percent, it still acts the same way, wants a super low scalar value.

    Quote Originally Posted by sevinn View Post
    Leave scalar stock for the 103s
    Tried that, not even close to happy like that. This one is dead on it seems with 2850 as a value?? Integral and derivative idle corrects around 0
    Factory Stock 97 SS M6 13.51 @ 104.3 mph
    Stock Longblock LS1 w/ 233/238 P.S.I. Cam
    10.81 @ 126.9 Full interior, six speed on 275 radials, a decade ago

    '99 TA trunk mounted 76mm 6 Liter
    9.0s in '09 @ 153 MPH

    Turbo 5.3 Volvo 740 Wagon
    32psi and still winding out 5th on the highway somewhere

  11. #11
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    I honestly don’t know the reasoning, but sometimes I’ve had to move the scaler a lot to work properly!

    I talked to Nick one day on an 07 vette I was doing and could not get it to work properly.. he told me to change the scaler to something way less then stock and worked perfect and base running airflow numbers were realistic!

    Now there are a ton of aftermarket Throttle bodies, so the problem is even worse.. now a days I give it about 10-15 min before I tell customers they TB is trash (usually put a stock one on and works perfect as a test that’s it’s the TB causing the problem)

    Most large then stock TBs work fine, but there are many out there that a tune won’t ever fix

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  12. #12
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208
    Just to reiterate that I wasn't crazy, later found guy ran into this and Nick Williams told him cars with earlier silver blade TB should use a scalar in 3000 area like I came up with

    https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ttle-body.html

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    Nice update… yea I’ve ran into similair problems and just had the customer get a new TB.. ashamed people spend $700 on a TB and doesn’t work….

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    824
    I spoked with Nick when I put on his 103 on my ctsv and he said leave the scalar STOCK. I initially increased it due to everyone with the 102 did that, but when I did that the throttle felt VERY boggy

  15. #15
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    Quote Originally Posted by sgod1100 View Post
    I spoked with Nick when I put on his 103 on my ctsv and he said leave the scalar STOCK. I initially increased it due to everyone with the 102 did that, but when I did that the throttle felt VERY boggy
    Correct… since the 103mm has been out, stock scaler has even used on most e38s
    E40, p59 still needs some manipulation

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  16. #16
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,693
    Quote Originally Posted by GrannySShifting View Post
    Just to reiterate that I wasn't crazy, later found guy ran into this and Nick Williams told him cars with earlier silver blade TB should use a scalar in 3000 area like I came up with

    https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...ttle-body.html
    Nick personally told me the same thing. It's when your replacing a silver blade throttle body you will use a value lower than stock. Gold is a different story.
    Tuner at PCMofnc.com
    Email tuning!!!, Mail order, Dyno tuning, Performance Parts, Electric Fan Kits, 4l80e swap harnesses, 6l80 -> 4l80e conversion harnesses, Installs

  17. #17
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by Alvin View Post
    Nick personally told me the same thing. It's when your replacing a silver blade throttle body you will use a value lower than stock. Gold is a different story.

    Is the blade colour linked to a different OS somehow otherwise that makes no sense whatsoever.

    I run a 103 on my 09 z06 with a calculated area scalar of 7405. Appears to work as expected?

  18. #18
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,693
    Quote Originally Posted by Sub8 View Post
    Is the blade colour linked to a different OS somehow otherwise that makes no sense whatsoever.

    I run a 103 on my 09 z06 with a calculated area scalar of 7405. Appears to work as expected?
    The two throttle bodies (gold vs silver) have slightly different "throats". The profile is done in a way to give the throttle a bell curve like a cable driven linkage. The two throttle bodies aren't interchangeable like people think. One will sometimes work for another but in most cases they will throw throttle codes a month later.
    Tuner at PCMofnc.com
    Email tuning!!!, Mail order, Dyno tuning, Performance Parts, Electric Fan Kits, 4l80e swap harnesses, 6l80 -> 4l80e conversion harnesses, Installs

  19. #19
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by Alvin View Post
    The two throttle bodies (gold vs silver) have slightly different "throats". The profile is done in a way to give the throttle a bell curve like a cable driven linkage. The two throttle bodies aren't interchangeable like people think. One will sometimes work for another but in most cases they will throw throttle codes a month later.
    So the associated calibrations must be different as well?

  20. #20
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Md
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Alvin View Post
    The two throttle bodies (gold vs silver) have slightly different "throats". The profile is done in a way to give the throttle a bell curve like a cable driven linkage. The two throttle bodies aren't interchangeable like people think. One will sometimes work for another but in most cases they will throw throttle codes a month later.
    When did they switch from silver to gold? All LS3 engine stuff had gold blades right? Chevy SSs? Were all Pontiac G8 GXP/6.0s silver or gold?
    Factory Stock 97 SS M6 13.51 @ 104.3 mph
    Stock Longblock LS1 w/ 233/238 P.S.I. Cam
    10.81 @ 126.9 Full interior, six speed on 275 radials, a decade ago

    '99 TA trunk mounted 76mm 6 Liter
    9.0s in '09 @ 153 MPH

    Turbo 5.3 Volvo 740 Wagon
    32psi and still winding out 5th on the highway somewhere