Which wideband

[fmtfireman]

I have read the forum and cant find a definitive answer telling which wideband from aem to use. I'll be tuning a 2000 Silverado mostly and I have the standard feature set not pro. Please point me in the right direction

[Carlfromkerikeri]

I purchased an AEM 300 series wideband that I log through a serial to USB connector to my laptop, it works great and was easy to setup. Goat rope garage on YouTube has a good video on how to setup using the standard feature set.
It’s only 2 wires to solder onto a serial connector to start logging.

[fmtfireman]

Thanks for the info. I have a 300 on the way

[danmw2003]

The AEM 30-300 is the one that will work with the AEMNet canbuss through the prolink cable. Poll rates are much faster through that vs using serial.

[awest623]

His truck doesn't have canbuss...

[danmw2003]

No, but the wideband does..... hench the AEMNet protocol

[dr.mike]

The ProLink has CANBus. And, it will talk to the AEM 30-0300 and 30-0310 widebands, Along with a few that I have not tried. This is MASSIVELY superior to
the serial data method.

[fmtfireman]

So are you saying buy prolink? I have standard

[danmw2003]

I would just so you could use the CAN protocol. It leaps and bounds better than serial

[dr.mike]

For now, the Pro Feature Set and ProLink is the way to go. The ProLink has it's own CAN interface that can recieve AEMNet CAN messages, used by the 30-0300 and 30-0310.

I am, just now, starting a new project for older, non-CAN, vehicles. It will be a little box that gives a 30-0300/30-0310 30-0334 functionality, but, with J1850VPW/PWM, as well as CAN based OBDII ability. This should cover all US built vehicles from 1996 on ( I think ).
It will, also let you set up multiple channels of 30-0300/30-0310. And, mix 30-0300 with 30-0310 units.

It will be a while. 1st units will, probably be available around August/September. I am targeting a price of about $60 - $65 , which is just about the difference in price between a 30-0300 and 30-0334. I MAY be able to add some additional functionality, like exhaust back-pressure compensation, Sensor test/calibration verification, etc. Maybe even a smart sensor-heater delay function, to prevent thermal shock to the sensors, on start-up. Time will tell

[fmtfireman]

Thanks for the info. I will look into going that route. Hopefully truck is starting today, so I'll have to use what I have for now. We'll see what happens