AEM 30-0334-type direct OBDII wideband for older vehicles. Any takers ?

[Allcagedup]

Yea I understand how to use the transform function. I think my wiring is wrong.

I posted the wiring from the Prolink because I have not seen one from the Prolink+ I am assuming they are the same.

The AEM document is confusing, I am not sure why we are unpinning and repinning but according to this, it looks like Analog 1/2, Red or Blue from the Prolink+ should be on terminal 9 and Black GND from the Prolink+ should be on terminal 10?

Anyone else using this setup?



Capture1.JPGCapture2.JPG

[Aggie3rdGen]

Interested in this as well! Looking for these to be available soon

[Robergts]

The 30-0334 on dodge non CAN, is compatible to scan direct from obs port,? I have a 30-0300 using serial data, but i whant direct conection because my win 11 dont like serial port

[dr.mike]

The 30-0334 is CAN-Only. My new device is CAN & J1850. But, I have lost track of my testers

So, now, I have to wait for the pre-production parts to come in, before I can send out some more test units. This will work on pre-CAN Dodge/Chrysler. But, it will take a bit of work; because, I don't have an ECU simulator for Dodge. ( I have GM and Ford ECU simulators ) So, I have to, kinda "wing it" for the MOPAR crowd.

I expect the new PCBs just after the 1st of the year.

[Robergts]

Nice news, i wait for that,

[TheMechanic]

Yea I understand how to use the transform function. I think my wiring is wrong.

I posted the wiring from the Prolink because I have not seen one from the Prolink+ I am assuming they are the same.

The AEM document is confusing, I am not sure why we are unpinning and repinning but according to this, it looks like Analog 1/2, Red or Blue from the Prolink+ should be on terminal 9 and Black GND from the Prolink+ should be on terminal 10?

Anyone else using this setup?



Capture1.JPGCapture2.JPG

I use this currently so I can do both CAN and non can easily.

[54inches]

The 30-0334 is CAN-Only. My new device is CAN & J1850. But, I have lost track of my testers

So, now, I have to wait for the pre-production parts to come in, before I can send out some more test units. This will work on pre-CAN Dodge/Chrysler. But, it will take a bit of work; because, I don't have an ECU simulator for Dodge. ( I have GM and Ford ECU simulators ) So, I have to, kinda "wing it" for the MOPAR crowd.

I expect the new PCBs just after the 1st of the year.

Hey Mike!

I am looking to buy a new AEM wideband to start tuning my project truck. It is a 2005 Silverado with a 2005 6.0 that replaced the stock 5.3 @ 275,xxx miles.

Seeing that the ECM is not CAN based in this application. Which AEM should I buy? I know you are still working on a kit, but unfortunately, I need something fairly soon; in the next month.

Tons of research brought me here.

Thanks for your help!

[dr.mike]

With all the COVID nonsense ( including my production guy having COVID ), I JUST NOW got the A3 rev PCBs in.
I should have a few test units available this week.

[swsmotorsports]

let me know, im very intrested

[mrogersmike]

I'm in a "06" mustang gt and looking for more inputs or at least a more reliable wb input. I'd buy a prototype for testing if it would help.

[morepowerjoe]

Hey Mike, I have a 30-0334 that I bought for my son's 2000 Corvette. I don't know what all your looking for in testers but I would be willing to help if you let me know what all you would need from me.

[54inches]

With all the COVID nonsense ( including my production guy having COVID ), I JUST NOW got the A3 rev PCBs in.
I should have a few test units available this week.

I'll take one as I am about to order the wideband for my Silverado.

[gtstorey]

I would think he is looking for experienced and busy professional tuners to be able to test this in all configurations.

[dr.mike]

I should be ready to send out a new batch of test units, early next week.

[dr.mike]

OK. I am back online

I tested out the new prototypes. They look good so far. I am ready to take on a few new testers. Starting with GM 1996-2006. Then Ford.

Chrysler is going to be a bit more complicated. I have ECU simulators for GM and Ford. So, the development/testing is good to go. But, I have not found a simulator for the Chrysler flavor of J1850/VPW. I may need to resort to grabbing an old Chrysler PCM off of ebay. And, trying to bring it to life, on the bench.

Since my mailbox here tends to overflow, I can be contacted at [email protected]

I would prefer testers who can test multiple applications. But, for the 1st couple of units, I just need people who will put some miles on these units, and keep the firmware updated / make error reports ( GM, initially ).

20230220_190149.jpg

Yes.. those are 3D printed housings



Meanwhile, I can use a few testers for another toy. Specifically for anyone using water/meth injection. These are, pretty much, good to go.

20230108_023231.jpg
20230125_224348.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTqHXeWDT50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isVy_k_HT68

[dr.mike]

Which Dodge/Chrysler/Plymouth ( and Jeep ? ) applications are people interested in adding support for?
I am going to have to grab a couple of PCMs off of EBAY and Frankenstein them back to life on the test bench, to get these going. So, I need to know which ones to grab.

[dr.mike]

OK. These are as ready as they are going to get. Everything is working as designed, on the test bench.

I am looking for the 1st 3 testers. Ideal candidate is someone who:

• is using the AEM 30-0300 or 30-0310 widebands.
• has at least one GM vehicle ( 1996-2006 ) non CAN.
• will put some significant logging miles/time on the units.
• is familiar with HPTuners VCMScanner setup.
• can report back with errors/issues, etc.
• can download and install update files from the web.
• in a perfect wold, has access to non-CAN Ford and Chrysler vehicles.
• and, eventually CAN based vehicles.

obd2brick-preprod.jpg

[Hippo]

How soon can I get one of these shipped to Texas?

[dr.mike]

I can probably send units out on Monday.

[schpenxel]

It's all about the chips... If I can get the parts, I should be able to get units in the field by the end of Q1. It's difficult to commit $$ to a design, knowing that the chosen parts could dry up, at any moment. I already had to go with my 4th choice for a CPU. It's not a bad CPU. But the cost is higher. And, it is, physically, larger. So, I ended up needing to drop support for the ISO9141-2 interface, to get everything to fit.

Apologies I've been out of the loop on here for the most part lately

What is the new device you've put together?