Could some one please tell me what's going on here? I see these two graphs showing both rich and lean at the same time.
Am I wrong?
Thank you.
Could some one please tell me what's going on here? I see these two graphs showing both rich and lean at the same time.
Am I wrong?
Thank you.
I'm gonna guess a math problem in your WB setup.
I have LT + ST [Math] as an average, showing percentage.
and
EQ Ratio #1 sensor as average, Lambda
As a first time "tuner", I'm just following tutorials.
Originally Posted by SantafeNoob
EQ Ratio is the inverse of Lambda.
GM used EQ Ratio as the "native" means of fuel calculations in Gen 3 (P01 / P59) calibrations.
The later Gen 4 ECMs used a mix of EQ Ratio and AFR within the calibrations.
Thanks. Comparing the FT's I figured my EQ ratio table was off.
Where can I find the proper setup for a graph utilizing my Wideband.
Thank you
If you are going to be running in CL then I would just use your NB sensors to tune part throttle areas and leave the WB for higher load/WOT areas of the map. I've found there will always be a descrepancy between the WB and NB sensors. Makes no sense to tune your part throttle areas with a WB if you are going to be having the NBs turned back on and correct it back to what the NBs think is stoic. I always use my NBs to tune part throttle areas
Well I figured out my WB issue this week. It's a POS. It is 7 weeks old, cost +$250 and it's dead.
AEM 30-0334 X-series UEGO Wide Band.
I have contacted the seller (past return date), and AEM. I am hopeful that they will stand behind their product.
that's the one i have....have had it going on a few years now and is perfectly fine (to my knowledge)
Reply With Quote