Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Fuel pressure sensor doubts

  1. #1
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131

    Fuel pressure sensor doubts

    Hey, not sure what to make of this data. Just finished up a boost referenced return fuel system install with 2 x Walbro 460 (staged), base pressure is set at 50psi. Running around 750hp at the engine so should have heaps of fuel.

    When I calculate the delta pressure from sensor volts I'm +/-1 psi off base pressure in all driving scenarios so I think yah, the world is good. But when doing the same using the fuel pressure PID, in all scenarios except WOT everything follows nicely, but WOT takes a dive like I'm out of pump. I have tried multiple PID's and they all read the same. I don't know which reading to trust.

    FYI
    Calculated delta pressure from sensor volts (P/N ACDELCO 13516496, Gain 27.809, offset -20.717)
    (Gain x Sensor_Volts - Offset) + (Baro - MAP)
    (27.809*[6507.10]-20.717)+([50032.98]-[50030.98])

    Just wondering if anyone has encountered this before and can offer some guidance as to how I should interpret.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,561
    Isn't the fuel pressure PID generally considered little better than guesswork, an estimated value or something? My platform predates the FPCM/FSCM stuff but I seem to remember that being mentioned often.

  3. #3
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131
    Hey. I'm still new so haven't come across any of those statements yet. I'm going to go for a run with a go pro looking at the mechanical gauge so that will clear it up once and for all.

  4. #4
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131
    Well holy fuck.

    The fuel pressure PID can't be trusted. Fuck knows what the ECM is doing with it to skew it like that.

    Log and video of FPR included so you can see for yourself.

    Video Here
    Attached Files Attached Files

  5. #5
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,561
    Yup. Some of that can be down to a scanner issue/error too, nothing to do with the data the ECM is seeing/using for calcs. The ECM probably uses the raw voltage directly in its math stuff without needing to do a human-friendly conversion.

    See here for a scanner issue: https://forum.hptuners.com/showthread.php?78662
    First go-round with the support ticket got it reading pressure, but the conversion was off... needed a second tweak to the scanner to get it to match values shown in the Tech2.

  6. #6
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131
    Ta, will log a ticket here locally and see how it goes.

  7. #7
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,561
    Hey... is there a GM-specific PID for Fuel Pressure, instead of the SAE one in your log?

  8. #8
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131
    No, nothing defined for my OS. Screenshots of whats available to me...
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #9
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Sep 2021
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by hjtrbo View Post
    Well holy fuck.

    The fuel pressure PID can't be trusted. Fuck knows what the ECM is doing with it to skew it like that.

    Log and video of FPR included so you can see for yourself.

    Video Here
    I'm going to end up running a mechanical gauge off my rail and just have it taped or maybe I'll 3d print a holder just were the cowl raises up at the windshield to have a permanent mount to verify mine. I get slightly hesitation sometimes on WOT but the AFR always seem fine, could just be the remote base tune and never having it on a dyno. I hope my solution is easy as yours haha. I really don't want to put a $1000 aux pump or a $2000 fore setup when I will never make anymore then 650whp for the foreseeable future.
    2014 Camaro 2SS 1LE
    Stock LS3 internals
    Huron speed single t4 kit
    VSracing 7875 cast turbo
    850CC Fuel injector Clinic injectors
    ZL1 fuel pump
    Wastegate 8.7lb spring

  10. #10
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131
    Maybe there is some things that can be done. Here is the response from our local HPT support guru. I'm going to stay with my sensor volts conversion. I'll have to run another mech gauge and take another video of the 2 mech gauges to work out the pressure drop at x flow. I'm all AN8 plus the factory 3/8 supply rail, I guesstimate to be around 2-3psi line pressure drop at 450L/H.

    Hello xyz,

    Have you changed the Injector flow rates and settings in the FSCM?

    There are a couple of issues that may impact this, there are likely parameters in the tune that we do not see. The pressure logged likely contains a friction loss for the line relative to flow, this scale, model or table is probably no well scaled or out of bounds at the fuel flow you are at. The FSCM is limi9ted as you have probably realised. The pressure you are seeing is the ECU estimate at the rail as the sensor is at the rear. It is incorrect due to the high flow.

    I can see if there is the possibility of finding the relevant table but there is no guarantee it would be scalable at significantly higher flow.

    The voltage conversion math is fine that you have done but does not allow for the pressure drop in the line.

  11. #11
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,561
    What thread is that sensor - is it the same as the fuel rail test port or something else? I'm kinda thinking of adding one to a non-FPCM platform if I can figure out a way to log it.

  12. #12
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Add the channel: "Inj. Delta Pressure" to your list. That is usually what the injector flow rate, injector voltage offset vs pressure is used with. Also need to make sure the min/max rail pressure isn't set to 400kpa on both as that will force rail pressure to stay at 400kpa and the delta pressure to calculate off that set value rather than the rail pressure sensor.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  13. #13
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    VIC Australia
    Posts
    1,131
    LSx, I have injector delta pressure. Look at my previous logs. That PID is what started this whole thing. I have now deleted it because it is horse shit. I log sensor volts, apply the transform and i've got the horses mouth so to speak. Minus supply line pressure drop of course.

    Geez blindsquirrel, I want to say 1/8NPT but I'm not 100% sure. Mine has an OEM fitted quick connect adaptor which I am still utilising. I never pulled it off to check the thread itself on the sensor.

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner 4wheelinls1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    284
    There is a table that is missing in the FSCM, the PID shows the estimated pressure at the rail so the ECU can appropriately compensate from the injector pressure differential table. There is a drop in pressure due to the line size and length from where it is measured to the injector, with increased flow comes increased pressure drop, the table is not scaled for the large flow of aftermarket fuel systems hence the error that is seen, ideally if the table were there it could be scaled based on a separate gauge at the rail. The second issue is that the incorrect fuel pressure will cause the injector pressure delta to be incorrect in respect to the actual from the measured which in turn will offset the airflow and torque in tuning.

  15. #15
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,561
    FYI the sensor thread is M10x1.0.

  16. #16
    the delta pressure comes from psi in map vs. fuel pressure requested, not actual. The only way i seem to be able to get this dialed in is to calulate flow rates set the fuel pressure to the boost i want plus requested, i.e. 58psi plus 15 psi is 73. Make high flow 73 and ensure the setting are making it go into high flow at like 80 lbs/hr. I dont see why we cant get it to calculate diff. pressure off actual FP. Any thoughts?