Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Injector data transfer question Gen 4 to Gen 3 Flex Fuel

  1. #21
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Okemos, MI
    Posts
    115
    Is it always “convert the nominal psi rating to kPa, then take that value and go from there to that+80?

    That’s from nominal to +11psi. Why? When does the PCM use such high values? Is that used when referenced against MAP, so that the injector know it’s spraying +58psi into -7psi due to vacuum, and we account for the extra pressure differential when computing how much fuel to deliver?

  2. #22
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,649
    80kPa vacuum in the Gen 3 files is the same as a 480kPa Delta in the Gen 4 files, assuming both are non-referenced and 58PSIG in the rail. Mixing PSI (unspecified) and PSIA and PSIG and kPa hurts my head, too. 'Rail pressure' is PSIG, MAP is kPa absolute. 'Delta' is gauge/absolute agnostic, unless you're looking at one of them in A and the other in G. Which we are when trying to describe this using fuel-pressure-gauge-relatable numbers for rail pressure.

    Gen 3 0kPa vacuum and Gen 4 400kPa Delta are both 58PSI vs normally-assumed baro.

    screenshot.11-08-2023 20.12.01.png

    (this same Delta range applies to the big Offset tables, too.)

    screenshot.11-08-2023 20.12.31.png

    In the Gen 4 files, to use the cells left of 400/408 you'd have to have either: less than 58PSI rail, or; 58PSI rail with more than normal atmosphere in the manifold (boost). For cells to the right of 480, it'd have to be either: more than 58PSI rail, or; 58PSI rail with less than 20kPa MAP (unpossible). But the Gen 3 files can't calculate for anything higher pressure than 0kPa vacuum, or lower pressure than 80kPa vacuum. So the only way anything outside the Gen 4's 400-480 range matters is if the Gen 3 is using some base pressure other than 58PSI.

  3. #23
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,649
    (This is just for background info, not strictly needed if the only goal is a late-Gen-4-to-Gen-3 conversion spreadsheet. There aren't any good injectors you'd want to use in a swap from this year range, or, if there are, those same injectors were carried over into the year ranges ('07-'09) where the existing old spreadsheet is able to convert them.)

    The Delta tables appeared in 2006 (edit: 2007). Before there were FPCMs and variable fuel pressure used in anything. So, the unhittable areas were just filled in with placeholder numbers:

    screenshot.11-08-2023 20.37.37.png

    ...but in the very first 2006 Gen 4s, they did something altogether different:

    brain aspload.png

    Negative vacuum!!!!11one
    Last edited by blindsquirrel; 08-11-2023 at 09:19 PM.

  4. #24
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    7,649
    (note: The screenshots above are for comparing formats/axis labels only, the actual injector data has not been converted between them)

  5. #25
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Okemos, MI
    Posts
    115
    Thanks, that’s helpful!

    To be clear, I think that was generally a “yes” to my interpretation: the 80kPa ranges allow the PCM to account for manifold vacuum, knowing that a stronger vacuum is going to mean a larger pressure differential between the rail and the intake port, and therefore more fuel being injected for a given dwell time. (Leaving out the additional complexities of a boosted scenario as they don’t apply to me.)

    Agreed on mixing absolute and gauge pressures hurting the brain. I didn’t consider that here, sorry.
    Last edited by JakeRobb; 08-13-2023 at 10:07 PM.

  6. #26
    Sorry, I never did come back to this after I got it all sorted out and working.
    Everything is clear as mud and worked great. Thanks again for the help!

    #NeverLetForumsDie