Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: 1 Bar to 2 Bar Conversion for boost in LT1

  1. #1
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    78

    1 Bar to 2 Bar Conversion for boost in LT1

    Hi fellow tuners,

    Wanted to know what's the appropriate tables and areas to scale if changing the 1 bar MAP sensor to a 2 bar (from an Gen IV LSA ZL1 or CTSV), into a C7 LT1 application. It's gonna be an A&A kit. Kit didn't bring a 2 Bar MAP nor a baro breakout harness, but I'd really like to tune this C7 auto the most correct way possible for boost, to assist the torque calculations to be accurate and just to have everything kosher.

    Also, how many of you are actually tuning boost on LT1s with a 2 bar and a breakout harness? Seems like a mixed bag out there. Heard some even do without the 2 Bar and leave the 1 bar, but sounds to me like a recipe for torque calculation disaster, even if it's a MAF tune.

    CORRECTION: It was always a 3 bar sensor (PN 12592525) to be retrofitted, which is the LSA ZL1/CTSV pressurized MAP sensor. I incorrectly said 2 bar.
    Last edited by turabo87; 05-04-2022 at 10:31 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    I like to use 3 bar map. Just rescale VVE table and tune it!

    Baro breakout has to be used to dial in pressure ratio correct otherwise when boost hit the sensor it skews the PR ratio

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  3. #3
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    78
    I might be saying it wrong then, maybe it's a 3 bar. It's the LSA ZL1/CTSV Map sensor to be retrofitted.

    So only rescaling VVE? No rescaling of the MAP itself anywhere?
    Last edited by turabo87; 05-04-2022 at 09:36 AM.

  4. #4
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,565
    You just have to tell the computer what the new linear and offset settings are.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner Ben Charles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Calibrating
    Posts
    3,373
    312.50
    -11.25

    Email Tunes, [email protected]
    96 TA Blown/Stroked, 4L80E/Fab 9
    15 C7 A8 H/C 2.3 Blower/PI
    14 Gen 5 Viper
    Custom Mid Engine chassis, AKA GalBen C

  6. #6
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    78
    and where would that be? I'm thinking of using linear and offset settings from an LSA ZL1 tune then.

  7. #7
    Tuning Addict 5FDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    13,565
    In the airflow tab.
    2016 Silverado CCSB 5.3/6L80e, not as slow but still heavy.

    If you don't post your tune and logs when you have questions you aren't helping yourself.

  8. #8
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Charles View Post
    I like to use 3 bar map. Just rescale VVE table and tune it!

    Baro breakout has to be used to dial in pressure ratio correct otherwise when boost hit the sensor it skews the PR ratio
    Agree with him. I had a blower without the baro breakout, and the baro readings would go up to the limit of the baro sensor (17.7psi) when the true baro was in the 14s. Gives false numbers in other words.