Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: INJ Duty (%) drops off @ 5.500 rpm

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    8

    INJ Duty (%) drops off @ 5.500 rpm

    Hello,

    the INJ Duty drops off at around 5.500 rpm.
    max INJ Duty is 53%, in older logs its rising up to approx. 70% @ 6.600 rpm.

    Engine is a Gen 2 5.0GT - stock.

    Are the injectors defect ?

    inj_duty_max53.jpg

  2. #2
    Senior Tuner SultanHassanMasTuning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    All Around
    Posts
    3,149
    whats your Lambda / wideband reading
    Follow @MASTUNING visit www.mastuned.com
    Remote Tuning [email protected]
    Contact/Whatsapp +966555366161

  3. #3
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    8
    0,85 @ 2.500rpm drops to 0,82 @6.500rpm
    over 6.500rpm it drops down 0,75 because of catalyst temp

    here`s the complete log.
    20220515_log_stock.hpl
    Last edited by MKYBIZ; 05-15-2022 at 10:52 AM.

  4. #4
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    8
    Any ideas ?

  5. #5
    Senior Tuner veeefour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,731
    Your maf transfer is probably fookd

  6. #6
    You're logging too many parameters or your polling interval is too low. The chart is misleading because it interpolates between samples. If you look at injector pulse width, you only got 4 samples of the pulse width in the entire time that you were full throttle. The duty cycle is a math calculation with RPM in the equation, so it looks smooth, but there are only 4 discrete samples of actual injector pulse width, so it's totally inaccurate. In this picture, I circled in red where the pulse width updates happen. The chart display will just draw lines between the points, but that isn't what's actually happening. Remove a ton of unnecessary parameters and increase the polling interval of pulse width to the fastest setting and you will get better data.

    pw samples.PNG
    Last edited by Ruiner46; 05-19-2022 at 08:41 PM.

  7. #7
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    779
    Excellent, ruiner.

  8. #8
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruiner46 View Post
    You're logging too many parameters or your polling interval is too low. The chart is misleading because it interpolates between samples. If you look at injector pulse width, you only got 4 samples of the pulse width in the entire time that you were full throttle. The duty cycle is a math calculation with RPM in the equation, so it looks smooth, but there are only 4 discrete samples of actual injector pulse width, so it's totally inaccurate. In this picture, I circled in red where the pulse width updates happen. The chart display will just draw lines between the points, but that isn't what's actually happening. Remove a ton of unnecessary parameters and increase the polling interval of pulse width to the fastest setting and you will get better data.

    pw samples.PNG
    Thx a lot, already started yesterday to clean up logging parameters. Any recommendations for max parameters ?