13 file was minutely different and still tripped the code. Ended up stopping by a dealership today and pulling a read off a stock truck. Problem solved
Type: Posts; User: PST
13 file was minutely different and still tripped the code. Ended up stopping by a dealership today and pulling a read off a stock truck. Problem solved
Hoping someone has a stock file for this truck. Not one in the repository, and I need to check the stock throttle tables.
I have a truck here for a tune that keeps throwing p0606, and the tune in...
I believe the VE table does use PRatio even though it just says Ratio... Im about to confirm that myself, digging into my very 1st chrysler tune this am.
Its not loggable that I could see on SCT... Besides that, when the hell do you actually need to see that data? Ive been tuning quite a few different makes for a long time and I cant tell you the last...
Just on a quick glance.. Stock MAF tables, IMRC stuff is disabled, but the VCT stuff is relatively untouched.
The VCT settings shouldnt hinder your idle. Im in agreeance with AKDMB on the MAF...
Ummmm... The ECU should still be commanding the pump to turn on/off. But in the fuel tables, in MOST cases, if its a modifier based on rail pressure (measured or inferred) it gets set to all 1's.
...
Im guessing your talking about a return fuel system with a vac/boost referenced regulator and the fuel injector pressure modifiers... In that case YES you have to set them to 1, and this is required...
Ok, Ill get it done.
I actually have some nGauge logs with a map sensor if youre interested.. HPT wont open the logs (they're .csv files), and I doubt I was logging all the parameters you need...
Wouldnt this all be easier to figure out if we were to measure actual manifold pressure with a map sensor? Then we could solve the equation with an actual number for that term. Ive been using a...
I always do it: Engine Running, vacuum line off the regulator.
Just tried the speedo cal in the scanner on this 2016 car.
1st thing I noticed was that it said the car has 3.55's.. I left that alone, even though the owner stated that the car has 3.31's. Then...
Seems to work on this 2016.. The tables/settings are there, havent tried to make any drastic changes on this one though.
Awesome!! Will be playing with it tonight on this Coyote!
Exhaust leak on the left side? I've seen pinholes at welds do stuff like that to the o2 readings.
Regardless of closed or open loop. Fords ALWAYS use the MAF sensor directly for fueling calculation (unless MAF is failed).
Open loop just means no correction to errors in fueling.
Posting 2 different posts for basically the same issue really isn't going to help much. As Jeff stated, post your tune and log. There are quite a few of us that have tuned many of these cars with...
Forget about the mapped points for a bit..
Your setup is very basic and should be easy to get running.
1st step, get the proper injector data in the tune. Remember that most fords prior to the...
Yeah, your thread title says mapped points, but your first post mentions map (I assume you meant MAF) period.
There are quite a few threads on here dealing with logging, maf tuning, which spark...
With forced induction cars especially, it makes dialing in the maf a pain in the ass. The anticipation logic references the failed maf table, which if incorrectly setup will skew your measured lambda...
Disregard Klumsy, without actual tune info to go off of, that's bad advice. Do you have hptuners, or the ability to use it so you can post your tune?
Without a tune file and a proper datalog, all...
1.99 is the highest number you can put in their. And it basically tells the computer to accept whatever load it sees. I usually put 1.99 in both of those.
Also (and I haven't looked at your tune),...
Only one who will 'come across this' is Eric. He already said it's possible and just hasn't gotten around to adding it.
I have seen that happen at service shops. One I fixed with a crank relearn, another was getting a serious audible rattle out of the clutch, so we fixed that and the problem went away. Then another...
The blower being fed positive pressure does increase its output... but it's not a straight multiplication of original boost pressure times incoming boost pressure.
Back in the day, I tuned a...
Leave it the way it is if a negative number is truly retarding timing