In short:
First three improve the narrowband switching response due to moving the location of the sensors vs stock manifolds.
Last one helps prevent false knock because thin headers can be...
Type: Posts; User: RobZL1
In short:
First three improve the narrowband switching response due to moving the location of the sensors vs stock manifolds.
Last one helps prevent false knock because thin headers can be...
Looks about right to me. You could maybe expect to take some off for a glory run, but for a mostly stock C7 60-130 in the 10's is on the money in my opinion.
And I second this!
Dave,
I certainly didn't mean anything by it. I'm a huge fan. I just got a kick out of it, myself as someone in a job who usually WANTS to say what you said, but I typically SHOULD say what...
After you guys get all your holes filled, I think Dave should put Smoke in charge of all customer communications. LOL
Smoke:
Same overall goal, different product vision. Our approach is less...
Love it. Physics is fun. Thanks for sharing from behind the curtain.
I'll bite. What in the world is rpm corrected against? I assume it must be a sensor or noise correction and not something like the pull of gravity affecting the crankshaft? LOL
Wowsers. Yeah, screw VVE at this point. Just get a good MAF tune first with all the other wonky sh!t fixed. If people get paid for this nonsense, I should quit my day job. LOL
... been sitting on the side of the road for over 2 months now
Just bump up the idle adaptive torques to something in the 20's or 30's. It will do what you're looking for, though I think it sounds like crap. You can google all kinds of youtube folks doing this...
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS-n7aPNJzcvv7WJbs1h2LdCDbXPM9ZTA0hRQ&usqp=CAU
I'm not 100% sure of the exact purpose of the "bias," but I know some people have lowered all the "max" values to limit intervention, and say it is better than just disabling. Try values of 30lb-ft...
https://forum.hptuners.com/showthread.php?36894-explanation-of-spark-smoothing-parameters
See the following for good background:
https://forum.hptuners.com/showthread.php?86215-Quick-guide-to-simultaneous-VVE-MAF-calibration-for-gen4
...
Bingo. You want to have some hysteresis or dead band there so it's not flipping back and forth as you approach and are around that RPM. Similar things in the rest of the tune, such as rev limits,...
Have you done a "re-sync interface" in the software? Sometimes that fixes silly issues with MPVI's. Might work for the RTD's too
And to completely tie a bow on it, the "re-enable" is simply a hysteresis so the change point has some gap, like many other parameters in GM tunes.
I think this has got to be a bot
I can tell you with certainty that 17 and 18 ZL1's have positive values as high as 19 degrees in those rows.
Thanks guys. Let me know if you find that tip-in map.
Greg's right. Copy the top three rows of the minimum spark table from a 2017 or 2018 ZL1, and it significantly reduce the pop-bang. They intentionally introduced more burble in '19, and I think...
Has anyone ever found a parameter/table for throttle rate application, both increasing and decreasing, that applies to the different driver demand maps?
When in Tour/Sport vs Track there are...
I did this for a week for the heck of it a few years ago. It was actually pretty cool. Not my cup of tea, but just enjoy playing with stuff.
https://youtu.be/Fe6-vtwROVU
To answer 04silverado6.0: MPVI2...
No big deal for me, just was curious to look at how GM has them set up. I don't quite understand why you can't even see the tune in the software unless you have...
Absolutely bonkers that you can't even see the tune unless you are one of the chosen 75!