Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3910111213
Results 241 to 260 of 260

Thread: Tune & Log. Gen VI CBB 1999 Vortec 7400

  1. #241
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,346
    They are 100cc heads. How thick is the head gasket? Domed pistons on that Eagle kit?
    https://eaglerod.com/item/5527353-co...v-tall-454-1pc

  2. #242
    Quote Originally Posted by oldpartsnrust View Post

    3. straight 0.060" bore, rather than 0.065" that engine guy recommended
    #10141279
    This sounds shady. The piston size and intended use will dictate the final bore size when done correctly.

  3. #243
    -3CC dished

    So they say to add to the volume as a positive value in the calculator.

    I ordered head gaskets (Cometic) that are 0.075" thick

    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 4 Weeks Ago at 10:04 PM.

  4. #244
    Yeah, I was not all that happy when the guy told me 4.315" bore... This time I sent the pistons with the block, they came back numbered and fitted per cylinder.

  5. #245
    Block is ready. Supposedly the line hone/bore is 'tight' whatever that means and the pistons are fitted to each cylinder. I guess that means that each cylinder was bored to match the piston? New cam bearings and the freeze plugs were already brass, so they are O.E.M. I will post pics of the block once I get it back. It was done on Thursday, but just getting out of the hospital sapped a bit of ambition. Couple that with the fact that a tropical storm was indiscriminately dumping rain all over the place AND that I have an open trailer, I decided to wait till Monday.

  6. #246
    Anyone care to check my compression calculation? (No, I won't blame anyone if it is wrong and I blow it up. I've already done that myself and I own it!).
    deck height: 9.780" (0.00" piston clearance)
    piston volume: +0.183" (+3 CC dish style)
    combustion chamber size: 6.102" (100 CC)
    head gasket bore: 4.500"
    head gasket thickness: 0.075"
    cylinder bore: 4.310"
    stroke: 4.25"

    I came up with 9.3:1

    anyone?
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 3 Weeks Ago at 01:25 PM.

  7. #247
    Block is now home safe:

    BlockTake2a.jpg


    Bored to pistons:

    Pistons5-7.jpg Pistons3-4.jpg Pistons2-6.jpg Pistons1-8.jpg
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 3 Weeks Ago at 10:44 PM.

  8. #248
    So after struggling with the spirolox removal and seeing that everyone else struggles with it like I do.... I took a 1/4" drive flat blade screwdriver bit and ground it down on an angle and it worked amazingly well at prying out the edge to be able to be grabbed by pliers for removal... Once you can pry the edge out of the groove and get it grabbable, it is game over for the keeper!



    SpiroLoxToola.jpg
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 3 Weeks Ago at 12:39 AM.

  9. #249
    Ok, learning a bit more about ping, quench height and CR. Looking at 0.036 with the current deck height and an 0.030 Head gasket. 10.1:1 if I get 4.630 bore gasket. Thinking my previous 0.030 quench height may have contributed to ping?

  10. #250

  11. #251
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,346
    Quote Originally Posted by oldpartsnrust View Post
    Anyone care to check my compression calculation? (No, I won't blame anyone if it is wrong and I blow it up. I've already done that myself and I own it!).
    deck height: 9.780" (0.00" piston clearance)
    piston volume: +0.183" (+3 CC dish style)
    combustion chamber size: 6.102" (100 CC)
    head gasket bore: 4.500"
    head gasket thickness: 0.075"
    cylinder bore: 4.310"
    stroke: 4.25"

    I came up with 9.3:1

    anyone?
    Quote Originally Posted by oldpartsnrust View Post
    Ok, learning a bit more about ping, quench height and CR. Looking at 0.036 with the current deck height and an 0.030 Head gasket. 10.1:1 if I get 4.630 bore gasket. Thinking my previous 0.030 quench height may have contributed to ping?
    I'm getting 10.05:1 CR with the 0.030" gasket and .006" deck clearance. 8.39:1 DCR with the cam 212/218 .510/.510 113+3 and 6.135" rod. Kinda pushing it there with that chamber design and iron heads.

    Since the heads are off now would be the time to do some bowl work, especially on the exhaust side.
    Last edited by SiriusC1024; 3 Weeks Ago at 11:40 PM.

  12. #252
    Tuning Addict blindsquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Meridian MS
    Posts
    8,727
    Tight quench reduces knock sensitivity, even when tightening it up increases the C.R. Proper quench is much more important than static or dynamic compression for a pump gas street engine. If you can run .036" without the piston rock causing a collision (depends on bore size, and piston/wall clearance) you aren't going to get much better than that, increasing it will only make it more knock-prone.

    Loose piston/wall, and larger bore needs more piston to head clearance to avoid contact which will pinch the top ring land.

    The Internet says dynamic compression is something you should pay attention to, engines built in the real world say that it's not. Keep the quench tight and it will be fine.
    GM Gen4 Injectors v2.1.xls
    ChatGPT is the end result of someone assuming that if they gather up a large enough pile of sh*t it will spontaneously generate a pony.

  13. #253
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,346
    Yes the quench is pretty good. If it does knock it can be brought in with timing adjustments.

  14. #254
    Ok, so I took a look at the block to verify the deck # and apparently I misread it the first time around. It is 9.794".


    Additionally, the rod lengths are 6.385". Not sure if that affects the dynamic CR or not as I don't know how to calculate that myself yet.

    I took a pic of what was stamped into the block.

    Deck.jpg

    IF my assumptions are correct now, this would give me 0.014" deck to piston clearance (to be verified once I get the crank and at least one piston in to check with feeler gauges and straight edge). SO, the gasket I got has 4.370" bore and 0.030" compressed thickness. This would give right around 9.9:1? I ALWAYS put premium in everything I own, even my freakin free lawn mowers.... So around here the minimum I have seen is 91 and it is usually 92. Upstate in NY I have seen as low as 89, but I have octane booster as well.

    Deck Height: 9.794
    Bore: 4.310
    Stroke: 4.25
    Gasket Bore: 4.370
    Compressed Thickness: 0.030
    Cylinder Head Volume: 100CC
    Piston Head Volume: 3CC


    Compression Height (in.): 1.270 in
    Stroke: 4.250 in
    Rod Length: 6.385 in.


    Advertised Intake Duration 264
    Advertised Exhaust Duration 270
    Intake Duration at .050 Inch Lift 212
    Exhaust Duration at .050 Inch Lift 218
    Intake Valve Lift 0.51
    Exhaust Valve Lift 0.51
    Lobe Separation 113
    Valve Timing Lift 0.006
    Exhaust Close ATDC -6
    Intake Open BTDC -5
    Exhaust Open BBDC 44
    Intake Close ABDC 37
    Lifter Style Hydraulic Roller

    Compression.PNG

    If I remember correctly, the knock sensor was always reading knock? I am still hoping that this was a result of the oiling issue causing valvetrain noise which was being interpreted as knock? I also recall that the addition of octane booster did nothing to the sensor reading?

    Assuming these measurements are correct, then the quench would result in 0.044" (which still seems to be in the target range?) and compression of 9.9:1 without fiddling with any head work or anything like that? I only say that because this is simply the family tow vehicle and should never see the northside of 5000RPM. I do expect to be towing about 4000-5000lbs through the mountains which is what took out the stock 454 at 179,000 miles AND an oil diverter baffle failure that wedged it into the oil passage resulting in a death rattle when I tapped the brake after the cruise had a downshift and rev to 5000RPM (4 rods spinning at once is what it looked like when taken apart...)

    Sounds like this is a feasible combination? I originally was shooting for lower compression, but thought my heads were 110CC and not 100CC....

    Edit: I also have a 4-row aluminum radiator.
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 2 Weeks Ago at 04:53 PM.

  15. #255
    Just so it is all here instead of scattered all over my shed/workbench and various notes:

    Factory Spec Journal Diameter:
    Mains - 1-4: 2.7494, 5: 2.7488
    Rods - 2.20"

    Measured Journal Diameter:
    Mains
    1 - 2.74955"
    2 - 2.74935"
    3 - 2.74945"
    4 - 2.7494"
    5 - 2.7486"

    Rods:
    1 - 2.1999"
    2 - 2.1999"
    3 - 2.19995"
    4 - 2.1999"

    Rod Positions:
    1 - Ser# 04092
    2 - Ser# 03878
    3 - Ser# 04651
    4 - Ser# 04020
    5 - Ser# 04111
    6 - Ser# 08082
    7 - Ser# 04001
    8 - Ser# 04170

    Rod Torque Spec (ARP): 63 Ft/Lb

  16. #256
    I reviewed the tops of the pistons I removed and saw zero evidence of any pitting or other signs of detonation nor any signs of contact with heads, valves, etc. There was ample evidence of swirl in the carbon build up patterns from when it was running rich before the tuning started.

    SwirlCarbon.PNG

    I was running 9.780" on the block so there was 0.000" clearance and the 0.030" gasket gave a quench of 0.030" (dumb luck). The knock sensor was reading knock, the valvetrain was making every conceivable noise you can think of and the engine ran a little sluggish. I added octane booster on top of the 92 octane gas that I run all the time and it did zero for the knock sensor readings. Disabling the knock sensor made it run fantastic, even if it was only for one jaunt around the block, but I could tell the difference immediately. Figuring that the new block now has deck clearance of 0.014" and I will be using the same 0.030" head gaskets it comes out to 9.938:1 via the calculator. The quench will be 0.044" which is still inside the 'recommended' range, but a 0.001" but hey, It's in there! Assuming that any knock could be tuned out with timing or other tweaks, I think this is what I want to run. Unless anyone has any reason that I should change something? By all means please add any input. I was also considering the 0.040" head gasket that gets it to about 9.6:1, but sacrificing quench, which would be at 0.054". But for now sticking with the 0.030" and 9.938:1.

    Long story short, this thread may be back on-track with TUNING shortly here....
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 1 Week Ago at 01:52 PM.

  17. #257
    Got rings fitted. Hayes file fit on hypereutectic KB pistons. 0.029" for top ring, 0.023 for 2nd. ring. Going for crank bearing clearances check and install next.

    Got pistons, pins and rods sorted:
    #1. 1615.23G
    #2. 1615.41G
    #3. 1615.12G
    #4. 1614.93G
    #5. 1615.15G
    #6. 1615.18G
    #7. 1615.33G
    #8. 1615.03G
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 4 Days Ago at 10:08 PM.

  18. #258
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    3,346
    Did you happen to check bore clearance on the skirt?

  19. #259
    I did not. I left that to the machine shop. SUPPOSEDLY, they fitted each piston to each bore and then stamped the pistons with the cyl #. I had given them the block, pistons and spec sheet that came with the pistons. I'll see if I can figure it out.... I don't think my tools measure that big, but I will check.

    EDIT: Ordered a 4-5" micrometer (el cheapo) and should be here Thursday. I'll give it a go to see what I can come up with.
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 3 Days Ago at 06:34 PM.

  20. #260
    Ugh, Amazon 2 day delivery turned into 3 day again... I don't mind 3 day, but DON'T LIE and say 2 DAY!!!

    Also, looking at the Factory specs, the 'builder recommended' clearances would have put the crank in 'out of service range'. The factory spec is different for each main journal almost:
    MAINS:
    #1 - 0.0017" - 0.0030"
    #2-#4 - 0.0011" - 0.0024"
    #5 - 0.0025" - 0.0038"

    RODS:
    0.0011" - 0.0028"


    I am going to try to stick to the tighter end of the spectrum.
    Last edited by oldpartsnrust; 1 Day Ago at 05:30 PM.