ME9.7 Protocol - Component Protection = GM Protocol - Power Enrichment?

[Manny_fresh63]

As the title states, is that a good assumption?

[Joshinator99]

Component protection sounds more like Cat Over Temp to me (not Power Enrichment). Just my 2 cents.

[outlaw_50]

way different specially for ME9.7

[Manny_fresh63]

Is there an equivalent to command AFR/Lambda for WOT?

[chevota]

I have a different ecu, but for me component protection is what I use. I have a base, or target map, and a 2nd fuel map. It apparently switches to 2nd based on exhaust temps, so I make target more or less oem, and 2nd richer. I also have a power enrichment map but doesnt work right so I dont use it. If thats of any help.

[Enrico]

I have a different ecu, but for me component protection is what I use. I have a base, or target map, and a 2nd fuel map. It apparently switches to 2nd based on exhaust temps, so I make target more or less oem, and 2nd richer. I also have a power enrichment map but doesnt work right so I dont use it. If thats of any help.

It?s something really weird but it seems like that. I expect to find a VE table or injection timing or AFr target but?

[Norris Motorsports]

In a nutshell, yes it is the same concept.

EGTs are what seem to control commanded fueling on most European cars that I have tuned. Be careful for the difference in actual vs modelled EGTs though.