Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 6.0 FICM stock file- incorrect scaling?

  1. #1
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    7

    6.0 FICM stock file- incorrect scaling?

    The FICM stock file provided for the AMZ2AL12 calibration appears to be scaled wrong on the "Inj Delay 2" table 23875

    While comparing my .hpt read with others found on the forum I noticed this.

    Hardware: FICM 6.0 DSL, Ford 6.0 Diesel FICM
    VIN: 1FTWW31P06EC32***
    OS: AMZ2AL12
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner JaegerWrenching's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Albuquerque New Mexico
    Posts
    481
    That is the hydraulic delay of the High pressure oil from spool valve energize to pressure moving the intensifier piston. Or multiplier x delay + PW = actual spool valve energized time. When logging injector PW with the scanner it'll only show desired PW, or total spool valve PW - delay = theatrical injector "open" or PW time. Higher oil temps thin oil so delay time goes down, high pressure moves oil faster so again delay times go down. It looks right to me, and matches my personal ARZ2AL11. Do you have a pic of this non matching file?

  3. #3
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Posts
    7
    ARZ2AL11 inj delay 2.png

    notice the MPa scaling is .8 -25
    unlike the first image scaled to 100

    The table has same parameters set for PW delay.
    Its the top row ICP reading that is scaled incorrectly
    100 Mpa = 14,504 psi

    I also uploaded my .hpt from the ficm so you can compare
    original f350 ficm.hpt
    Last edited by Tater6oh; 06-11-2024 at 08:56 AM. Reason: added info and ficm read

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner JaegerWrenching's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Albuquerque New Mexico
    Posts
    481
    You are right!! It's actually off by a multiple of 4. So it's on HPT's end for sure. I'd submit a ticket and let them know. Also are you currently having issues because of this? If not you can either divide the whole axis by 4, then you can make copy paste changes based on same axis's, then multiply the axis back by 4 and flash it back in. Or you can just copy and paste in the same columns as they are the same in the ECU's eyes. Usually this math is taken care of in the background therefore you shouldn't have any issues.

  5. #5
    HP Tuners Support
    (foff667)
    Bill@HPTuners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Hailing from Parts Unknown
    Posts
    28,747
    Yes, please submit a ticket and we'll look into it.
    You can open a support ticket here https://support.hptuners.com/