Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 61

Thread: sd/ol tuned warm up going lean after about 145 degress

  1. #41
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    Thank you for that you are correct definitely idles better and seems to be more tame to drive with idle tune you sent.

    I did not know my map sensor data was an issue as I left that factory and cross checked it with 2 other factory tunes. So I never had anything to go by. How would I correct this issue I don?t know any data to put there
    Glad it helped. I guess I am wrong on the MAP data...checked the repo and a 13 Camaro SS has zeros in offset and slope. Learn something everyday!

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  2. #42
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    Alright I finished a drive, my goal is to tame the beast as much as possible. I?m going to watch your video again, go back to closed loop and try again. I also want to do some injector tuning when I get the fueling right thanks again.

    Could you tell me what you did I see you smoothed the vve down low, there is just a little throttle hangish in gear moving I?d like to knock that down a little but. Definitely trying closed loop again ur way

  3. #43
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Andover, MN
    Posts
    770
    There is no such thing as "injector tuning". The data you see is a physical characteristic of how the injector injects fuel mass.

    Unless you are talking about EOIT.

    There isnt much reason to start with the rest of the drivability concerns until the airflow model(fueling) is accurate.

  4. #44
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    Yes that?s what I mean EOIT after airflow and fueling

  5. #45
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    25-02-12 13-53-45.hpl CLOSED LOOP TUNE.hpt

    @Cringer i think ive got the vve cl and maf cl set up correctly but im still picking up transient throttle changes and idle reading like 20%+ rich that doesnt seem right i do have ltft disabled idk if that would effect much
    2013 Camaro ss ls3 m6
    Gpi ss4 cam, vararam vr drx, afr mongoose heads, highflow cats, long tubes, non adjustable roller rockers, limited shirt travel lifters

  6. #46
    Tuning Addict edcmat-l1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    5BA8
    Posts
    5,179
    It's not in closed loop. Your O2 readiness is too high.

    EFI specialist
    Advanced diagnostics, tuning, emissions
    HPtuners dealer and tech support
    email=[email protected]

  7. #47
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    25-02-12 13-53-45.hpl CLOSED LOOP TUNE.hpt

    @Cringer i think ive got the vve cl and maf cl set up correctly but im still picking up transient throttle changes and idle reading like 20%+ rich that doesnt seem right i do have ltft disabled idk if that would effect much
    You are still in open loop. There is still disagreement between MAF and VVE, although from the short log it isn't terrible. If you want to use my style of filters for the scanner you need to add the Fuel Trim Cell PID to your channels list. Otherwise you'll need to filter on Commanded EQ Ratio instead.

    Transient stuff will need to be sorted out later. The foundation for Transient Fueling is steady state. So my advice is:

    • Go back into Closed Loop
    • Enable STFT, do not enable LTFT
    • Disable COT
    • Disable DFCO and CFCO
    • Add the afore mentioned FTC PID to the scanner
    • Get a long log (30-60 minutes)
    • Drive should be be as steady state as possible, slow and easy inputs to throttle
    • Try to get around 4000 RPMs in as many different gears as possible, flat road, uphill, downhill, trying to reach the exterminates of engine load and RPMs
    • Don't start logging until everything is up to temp (I prefer engine oil to be 200*F myself)
    • Don't worry about WOT/PE fueling yet


    Your throttle hang is due to the Min Final Air being too high. This is a common mistake. People set it to the 'average' static idle airflow which prevents the ECM from removing air for an overspeed idle down condition and then the spark hits rock bottom due to the Min Final Spark table and the idle hangs or the car drives itself. According to the log idle does not seem super rich, just .98 to .99 lambda. Pretty impressive considering the SS4 cam.

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  8. #48
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    Attachment 157516 Attachment 157517 Attachment 157515


    above is a small run log just trying to get everything reading right before i do i long drive, the log says 20% right if i have everything set right and my wide band says .99-1 lambda ltft disabled so is the ecu already correcting the fuel or is one of my sensors not reading properly, the car seems to idle great doesnt seem rich

    cringer attached are the tune you sent and the one i sent you. im not seeing the min final air i see a base final minimum on mine is that the same. also it did not do the throttle hang on the previous tune before you helped smooth it for me. do you think one of the changes u added is effecting throttle hang. i see the changes but im not making much sense of it yet but ill keep looking and learning thanks for the help.


    thank you edcmat-l1 good eye i didnt see that, i set o2 readiness temp back to factory
    Can you please name the log and the tune from which it was harvested? I have no idea what to look at or what tune to change. Help me help you. Version control! Naming conventions! Eliminate variables! Eliminate error!

    Something like:
    Cringer Tune 69.hpt
    Cringer Log 69.hpl
    Idle Test 1.hpt
    Idle Test 1.hpl

    EDIT: Looking at the attached LOG it shows closed loop is active but neither tune has CL enabled. So can you please attach the corresponding tune?
    Last edited by Cringer; 02-14-2025 at 02:03 PM.

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  9. #49
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    my apologies i will do better Hins forth but i updated the last post with tune presently in the car thank you, i tried to do it a few days ago but got super busy. thanks again
    2013 Camaro ss ls3 m6
    Gpi ss4 cam, vararam vr drx, afr mongoose heads, highflow cats, long tubes, non adjustable roller rockers, limited shirt travel lifters

  10. #50
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    When I was editing the post my phone glitched and deleted it, so I tried to copy it from an old browser I had opened because it was the only place that had the post.

    Said post:
    new slate tune - cringer2 - VVE plus extra idle changes.hpt

    CLOSED LOOP TUNE.hpt
    LOG RUN:
    25-02-14 13-07-40.hpl


    Above is a small run log just trying to get everything reading right before i do i long drive, the log says 20% right if i have everything set right and my wide band says .99-1 lambda ltft disabled so is the ecu already correcting the fuel or is one of my sensors not reading properly, the car seems to idle great doesnt seem rich

    cringer attached are the tune you sent and the one i sent you. im not seeing the min final air i see a base final minimum on mine is that the same. also it did not do the throttle hang on the previous tune before you helped smooth it for me. do you think one of the changes u added is effecting throttle hang. i see the changes but im not making much sense of it yet but ill keep looking and learning thanks for the help.


    thank you edcmat-l1 good eye i didnt see that, i set o2 readiness temp back to factory



    EDIT: this is the tune im running and the one below is before changes
    the current running tune
    asfound 220.hpt

    BEFORE IDLE CHANGES
    new slate tune.hpt
    Last edited by Stealthy93; 4 Weeks Ago at 02:54 PM.
    2013 Camaro ss ls3 m6
    Gpi ss4 cam, vararam vr drx, afr mongoose heads, highflow cats, long tubes, non adjustable roller rockers, limited shirt travel lifters

  11. #51
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    did about a 30min scan after oil temp reached 200 degrees, it still seems like the vve filtering is not reading right on the histogram. should i just make the changes and see how it responds.

    also the we were talking about the idle hang its in the log also ill put the log and the tunes below

    30 min log run: 25-02-25 19-45-00.hpl

    running tune: asfound 220.hpt



    running tune with idle changes return to before have not ran yet: asfound 220 factory idle.hpt
    2013 Camaro ss ls3 m6
    Gpi ss4 cam, vararam vr drx, afr mongoose heads, highflow cats, long tubes, non adjustable roller rockers, limited shirt travel lifters

  12. #52
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    did about a 30min scan after oil temp reached 200 degrees, it still seems like the vve filtering is not reading right on the histogram. should i just make the changes and see how it responds.

    also the we were talking about the idle hang its in the log also ill put the log and the tunes below

    30 min log run: 25-02-25 19-45-00.hpl

    running tune: asfound 220.hpt



    running tune with idle changes return to before have not ran yet: asfound 220 factory idle.hpt
    What timestamp is the idle hang in the log?

    I would not attempt to correct idle issues using the adaptive changes you have in the proposed tune.

    You still need to tune MAF and VVE. At lower speeds MAF is lean and VVE is rich.

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  13. #53
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    ok i did a log with in and out of throttle almost all had a slight throttle hand but time stamp 8:31:35, i did some scanning it looks like the throttle returns, and the source says its idle when rpm staying elevated. but i did notice that the timing hangs for a few seconds before fully dropping off, could that be the issue with the throttle hang. i returned all idles parameters to factory except for base minimum airflow to see if anything we changed made it mad, but the throttle still hangs
    25-02-26 20-32-33.hpl


    this pic shows what i believe to be a cam reversion area and i believe is making it very hard to get a clean stead state log. within the blue circle area fuel goes real lean leaving from a dead stop but going down the road in that area the fueling is not far off. i tried to get power enrichment to kick on in that area, for one so the filters would not scan there and for two as a quick band aid. because in the blue area i get a lean pop but only on take-off (high load 'high throttle input', low rpm), does ok when cursing. the red circle is an area I can not safely long as when i get close it pops through the intake
    Screenshot (4).png


    this is the log that the above picture was take from
    25-02-25 19-45-00.hpl

    current running tune with idle parameters set to factory except min idle airflow
    asfound 220 factory idle.hpt

    you said that the maf is lean and the vve is rich with the above issues and it seems like either my wide band or narrowbands are not reading properly as narrow says its rich towards idle and cruse areas and wide band says 14:5 ish. is there a way to be sure or should i just update the maf and vve table with the data and see where it goes

    Thank you once again hopefully we can pin this thing down
    Last edited by Stealthy93; 4 Weeks Ago at 06:00 AM.

  14. #54
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    ok i did a log with in and out of throttle almost all had a slight throttle hand but time stamp 8:31:35, i did some scanning it looks like the throttle returns, and the source says its idle when rpm staying elevated. but i did notice that the timing hangs for a few seconds before fully dropping off, could that be the issue with the throttle hang. i returned all idles parameters to factory except for base minimum airflow to see if anything we changed made it mad, but the throttle still hangs
    25-02-26 20-32-33.hpl


    this pic shows what i believe to be a cam reversion area and i believe is making it very hard to get a clean stead state log. within the blue circle area fuel goes real lean leaving from a dead stop but going down the road in that area the fueling is not far off. i tried to get power enrichment to kick on in that area, for one so the filters would not scan there and for two as a quick band aid. because in the blue area i get a lean pop but only on take-off (high load 'high throttle input', low rpm), does ok when cursing. the red circle is an area I can not safely long as when i get close it pops through the intake
    Screenshot (4).png


    this is the log that the above picture was take from
    25-02-25 19-45-00.hpl

    current running tune with idle parameters set to factory except min idle airflow
    asfound 220 factory idle.hpt

    you said that the maf is lean and the vve is rich with the above issues and it seems like either my wide band or narrowbands are not reading properly as narrow says its rich towards idle and cruse areas and wide band says 14:5 ish. is there a way to be sure or should i just update the maf and vve table with the data and see where it goes

    Thank you once again hopefully we can pin this thing down
    When I say MAF is lean and VVE is rich, that does not mean in all areas. But with the small logs you have uploaded, this is what is looked like if I had to sum it up briefly. As you got larger logs that start gathering data in different operating regions you will see rich or lean in different areas.

    Typical reversion occurs at low load (aka low MAP) and low RPMs. This is an exhaust pulse returning from the collector back to the cylinder head and encroaching in the combustion chamber during overlap (some may refer to this is a natural EGR effect). The reason this happens at low RPMs is because there is not enough CFM of exhaust gasses to create a vacuum to pull gasses from the combustion chamber and keep them going in the same direction out of the tail pipe. To compound this, the other reason this happens at low load (low MAP) is because there is not enough pressure in the manifold to overcome (1) any reversion from exhaust and (2) any backflow of air when the piston comes around BDC.

    So for the area you circled, I wouldn't really consider it reversion. Yes it is low RPM, but it is a high load area. Primarily I would more chalk this up to the fact that the VVE table has not been tuned, so we cannot draw any conclusions yet. But realistically, this RPM area is hard for bigger cams with lots of overlap, I would really call this big cam inefficiency/operating the cam where it was not designed/VE suffers with big cams at low RPM.

    Then we haven't even touched on intake manifold runner length tuning.

    Have you made any changes to MAF or VVE yet? Use the chart data and tune it.

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  15. #55
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    Yes I did a little till I seen these excessive amounts show up and got a little concerned so I wanted ur opinion. I?ll probably go ahead now and try to get them dialed in as much as possible.

    Also is their any way I could filter out anything thing more or less that 10/-10 on vve

    And is there any way to force power enrichment in the low rpm high map areas to help the issue there some, nothing I change forces it to enable there

  16. #56
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    Yes I did a little till I seen these excessive amounts show up and got a little concerned so I wanted ur opinion. I?ll probably go ahead now and try to get them dialed in as much as possible.

    Also is their any way I could filter out anything thing more or less that 10/-10 on vve

    And is there any way to force power enrichment in the low rpm high map areas to help the issue there some, nothing I change forces it to enable there

    Yes, you can filter out excessive rich/lean in the scanner, as well as in my VVE Assistant tool. I wouldn't necessarily suggest that though, especially at first.
    Yes you can trigger PE sooner, but you should never use PE to mask airflow modeling or fuel injector characterization problems.

    You have a GPI SS4 cam, this drastically changes the engine's VE. You will be required to make big changes. You are also going to have to get comfortable with the idea of re-zoning the VVE table as well to make the data fit (after clicking the Calc Coeff button).


    Edit: I have the GPI SS3 and this is my VVE.
    SS3.jpg
    Last edited by Cringer; 3 Weeks Ago at 12:14 PM.

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  17. #57
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    alright im planning on doing a log run this evening and i remember seeing you said something about min spark table to stop spark from reaching rock bottom

    min spark.png you think i should set all low map numbers to 5 or something to start with maybe 10
    2013 Camaro ss ls3 m6
    Gpi ss4 cam, vararam vr drx, afr mongoose heads, highflow cats, long tubes, non adjustable roller rockers, limited shirt travel lifters

  18. #58
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    alright im planning on doing a log run this evening and i remember seeing you said something about min spark table to stop spark from reaching rock bottom

    min spark.png you think i should set all low map numbers to 5 or something to start with maybe 10
    I'd leave those stock unless you have a real reason to change it.

    Assuming (1) base idle advance is good, and (2) throttle and (3) spark adaptive are good, and (4) Min Final Air is NOT high, then this table should be fine.

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant

  19. #59
    Tuner in Training
    Join Date
    Jun 2023
    Posts
    34
    Ok I?ll look those over again but the issue is low rpm medium to high load (like start off from stop) the spark will go into the negatives

  20. #60
    Senior Tuner Cringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Somewhere smoothing your VVE table
    Posts
    1,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthy93 View Post
    Ok I?ll look those over again but the issue is low rpm medium to high load (like start off from stop) the spark will go into the negatives
    Then you need to find out why it is going negative, and not cover it up with the Min Final Spark table. Is burst knock enabled? Are you getting actual knock? Is timing being pulled due to IAT or ECT heat? Is TCS kicking in? Is the ECM trying to warm up the cats?

    <<< A standard approach will give you standard results >>>

    My Tuning Software:

    VVE Assistant [update for v1.5]
    MAF Assistant
    EOIT Assistant