View Poll Results: What is your WOT AFR?

Voters
38. You may not vote on this poll
  • Under 11.0

    4 10.53%
  • 11.0 - 11.5

    13 34.21%
  • 11.5 - 12.0

    8 21.05%
  • 12.0 or more

    11 28.95%
  • I have no idea

    2 5.26%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: What is your WOT AFR?

  1. #1
    Tuner BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    170

    What is your WOT AFR?

    This might only be a valid question for those with widebands, but I would be interested to know what actual AFR (not commanded) you like to have with your setup. List mods if not in sig.

    I have been running 11.0-11.5 to keep KR away. I've tried increasing to 12.0, but always get significantly more KR.

    2000 Regal GS | Twin-Charged T72 | HPT Pro + PLX Wideband | 12.55 @ 110 on 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!

    1998 5.9L Durango | Powerdyne supercharger @6psi | Mesa Headers | Gibson Cat-back | 1.7 RR's | Tuned PCM | Ported Heads | Custom TB & Intake | Custom fuel rails | Rebuild coming soon...

  2. #2
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    339
    It more depends on boost and supercharge type (GenV is better than M90 and turbo is better than GenV), than almost anything else (cam, heads, and other things come into play, but less so).

    Asking a near random question like this is not going to be valid for anything more than 1 car.

    That said... 11.7-11.9 is where mine likes to site with the 3.4, 11.3-11.5 with the 3.2" pulley.

    If yoiu don't mind, I did not participate in the survey.
    Mods in sig.
    '99 Black GTP Sedan
    3.4-2.6" PB Quick Change pulleys, Custom CAI, XP Cam, N* TB, LQ4 MAF, SLP headers, 42.5# Injectors, 180/195* thermostat.

    13.501 @ 103.392 on 91 (2.4 60-foot).
    13.82 @ 105.28 on 87 octane! (2.42 60-foot).
    263kph top end as shown on the GPS.
    All this and 39MPG to boot. What more can a man ask for?
    * Just another enthusiastic amateur tuner! *

  3. #3
    Tuner BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by JerryH
    It more depends on boost and supercharge type (GenV is better than M90 and turbo is better than GenV), than almost anything else (cam, heads, and other things come into play, but less so).

    Asking a near random question like this is not going to be valid for anything more than 1 car.

    That said... 11.7-11.9 is where mine likes to site with the 3.4, 11.3-11.5 with the 3.2" pulley.

    If yoiu don't mind, I did not participate in the survey.
    Mods in sig.
    I think that's a good response, and probably the point of this poll. I have had so many people tell me I should be running 12.0-12.5 with an intercooler, and what I find is that general rules like that may not apply. So, I was interested to find if the general rules are applying to others here or not. And you make a valid point that boost should be noted. I run around 11psi.

    2000 Regal GS | Twin-Charged T72 | HPT Pro + PLX Wideband | 12.55 @ 110 on 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!

    1998 5.9L Durango | Powerdyne supercharger @6psi | Mesa Headers | Gibson Cat-back | 1.7 RR's | Tuned PCM | Ported Heads | Custom TB & Intake | Custom fuel rails | Rebuild coming soon...

  4. #4
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    557
    I run 11.2-11.4. Any higher and I get knock.
    2005 Grand Prix GTP
    My CarDomain Page

  5. #5
    Tuner BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Perforator
    I run 11.2-11.4. Any higher and I get knock.
    That's intercooled, right? How much boost do you see?

    2000 Regal GS | Twin-Charged T72 | HPT Pro + PLX Wideband | 12.55 @ 110 on 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!

    1998 5.9L Durango | Powerdyne supercharger @6psi | Mesa Headers | Gibson Cat-back | 1.7 RR's | Tuned PCM | Ported Heads | Custom TB & Intake | Custom fuel rails | Rebuild coming soon...

  6. #6
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    557
    Intercooled yes. In the winter it was quite high with the 2.8 on, over 14.7. I have the 3.0 on now and it's warmer. The last time I scanned I think I saw map values in the 180's.
    2005 Grand Prix GTP
    My CarDomain Page

  7. #7
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI
    Posts
    5
    When I got my car tuned a couple of weeks ago, I was around 11.5. Now that the weather is cooler, my AFR's have dropped to around 10.7.

    I'm new and my interface is set to be delivered this Friday, then hopefully I can take a little more fuel out.

    That's on a 3.0 pulley and SSIC, with a few other mods.
    1988 Fiero GT w/ l67 and 4T65EHD swap

    256rwhp/319rwft/lbs and [email protected] in the 1/4

  8. #8
    Advanced Tuner johnh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    238
    11.2 - 11.6 Non-intercooled.
    2017 Chevrolet SS, Orange Blast Metallic, Rotofab CAI. Headers coming soon. Stock Tune for now
    Previous Rides: 2008 G8 GT, 2004 GTO, 2004 GTP, 2002 TA

  9. #9
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    339
    Thats strange. Becuase the weather has gotten cooler, it should have leaned it out more, not richened it more. It should have gone up numerically, not down.

    I'd suspect something else happening in that tune.
    '99 Black GTP Sedan
    3.4-2.6" PB Quick Change pulleys, Custom CAI, XP Cam, N* TB, LQ4 MAF, SLP headers, 42.5# Injectors, 180/195* thermostat.

    13.501 @ 103.392 on 91 (2.4 60-foot).
    13.82 @ 105.28 on 87 octane! (2.42 60-foot).
    263kph top end as shown on the GPS.
    All this and 39MPG to boot. What more can a man ask for?
    * Just another enthusiastic amateur tuner! *

  10. #10
    Potential Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by JerryH
    Thats strange. Becuase the weather has gotten cooler, it should have leaned it out more, not richened it more. It should have gone up numerically, not down.

    I'd suspect something else happening in that tune.
    Well I should should be getting my HPTuners interface on Friday, I will then be able to pull my tune and show my scans. Hopefully I can get some advice on where to go.

    Until then, I just keep running through the forums trying to absorb as much info as I can.
    1988 Fiero GT w/ l67 and 4T65EHD swap

    256rwhp/319rwft/lbs and [email protected] in the 1/4

  11. #11
    Tuner
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    132
    11.7-11.9 cam and IC, i'm always afraid if that pump dies what might happen. I tend to run around there for a happy medium.
    98 Buick GSX IS3 Heads/GenVblower/cammed/intercooled and stalled
    02 Collector Edition Trans Am WS6
    94 S-10 with Rancho 3" lift on 33's
    93 Typhoon
    07 Tahoe

  12. #12
    Advanced Tuner
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    339
    No matter what the form of power adder is... on a daily driver, I think it is a wise idea that one should tune in such a manner that you can drive it easy (40% TP and less, perhaps?), without being anywhere close to damaging the engine. In this manner, should something go wrong... it won't cost you an engine.
    '99 Black GTP Sedan
    3.4-2.6" PB Quick Change pulleys, Custom CAI, XP Cam, N* TB, LQ4 MAF, SLP headers, 42.5# Injectors, 180/195* thermostat.

    13.501 @ 103.392 on 91 (2.4 60-foot).
    13.82 @ 105.28 on 87 octane! (2.42 60-foot).
    263kph top end as shown on the GPS.
    All this and 39MPG to boot. What more can a man ask for?
    * Just another enthusiastic amateur tuner! *

  13. #13
    Tuner in Training LNorton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    37
    13.0 - 13.2, but I am N/A
    Lee
    '02 Firebird 3.8 IHRA H/FIA

  14. #14
    Advanced Tuner louvered97gtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    202
    On my 99GTP I ran 11.5 non intercooled with blips of Kr of no more than 2* on 3.0pulley with 13.5psi.
    99GTP: Flowmasters, ZZP Power log & Ported rear, 9.5:1, Bored over .010, removed balance shaft, Dbl roller chain, Intense S1X, custom ported heads, 45#inj., 105lb springs, 1.7 rockers, A103's, 180-stat, Gen V swap, 97 Cadillac TB & Custom machined alum. spacer, 95 GTP Hood louvers
    97GTP: Stock engine, 95 GTP Hood louvers

  15. #15
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Hutchinson. KS
    Posts
    152
    I run 12-12.5 afr, 2.8 pulley, around 12.25-12.5 boost, SSIC, forged internals, 0 KR!!!! Looking to add timing and drop pulley REAL soon and back my afr down to 11.75 or so. We'll see.
    Last edited by 00GTP; 05-30-2008 at 01:31 PM.
    2000 GTP- S2X, diamond forged 9.5:1, balanced, Lucas 42.5#, GenV w/N*, stage 3 heads, custom PCM, ZZP SS IC, TOGS, MPS 3.0, Intensified 3.69's tranny - low 12's!!!!

  16. #16

    the thread is old but, why not?

    I use E85 and my car seems to be much happier with 11.9-12.3 afr. Thats on a 3.2 pulley, 23* of timing, no intercooler. About 13ish psi at the top. My nitrous map i run 10.2:1 until it sprays then it evens out to 12.2-12.5, thats with 16* of timing, same 3.2 pulley, and boost goes a little up because of the cold temperatures of nitrous to 14-15psi.

  17. #17
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chandler AZ
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit gs
    11.7-11.9 cam and IC, i'm always afraid if that pump dies what might happen. I tend to run around there for a happy medium.
    Had that happen.
    My pump stopped running, because the relay died actually and I was at the track when it happened.
    Cylinder head temp were up that night.
    I learned two things that day, get a LED hooked up to the motor to make sure the IC cooling water pump is getting power at least and maybe runing and don't run platinum plugs at the track, they are grreat for the street driven daily driver.

    I run a 2.8 SC pulley, S3 heads, XPZ cam, ZZP Gen 2 IC core, ported M90, tons of tweaks and other parts. = 11.6 afr with slight KR transitioning to PE.
    I run the same with a splash of Torco with a 2.6 pulley = 11.6 afr with race gas I only see blips of KR during trans shifts but they are nominal.
    Best 60' = 1.716
    Best ET = 12.186
    Best MPH = 112.98


  18. #18
    Tuner BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    170
    After reading up about the CompuNurse monitoring setup, I think I am going to install that to keep tabs on the input and output temps of the I/C.

    I have been dialing in my fuel right around 11.5 at the track, and it seems to be running the strongest there. If I get up to 11.8, the KR kicks in.

    2000 Regal GS | Twin-Charged T72 | HPT Pro + PLX Wideband | 12.55 @ 110 on 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!

    1998 5.9L Durango | Powerdyne supercharger @6psi | Mesa Headers | Gibson Cat-back | 1.7 RR's | Tuned PCM | Ported Heads | Custom TB & Intake | Custom fuel rails | Rebuild coming soon...

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackGS
    After reading up about the CompuNurse monitoring setup, I think I am going to install that to keep tabs on the input and output temps of the I/C.

    I have been dialing in my fuel right around 11.5 at the track, and it seems to be running the strongest there. If I get up to 11.8, the KR kicks in.
    Is your time and mph current to this date? I'm just wondering because thats what i trap with my car (103-105) and i have way less mods kinda making me assume my tune is darn good. I know your car is heavier and all, but i'm just curious.

  20. #20
    Tuner BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by e85grandprix
    Is your time and mph current to this date? I'm just wondering because thats what i trap with my car (103-105) and i have way less mods kinda making me assume my tune is darn good. I know your car is heavier and all, but i'm just curious.
    That time and trap was last year before rockers, ported s/c, northstar TB, and more importantly, before a good tune. I ran that time with 4* of KR and 11* of timing. I also ran that on street tires.

    I went to the track twice this year, but I was having major boost problems (see other thread about that). I did trap 105+ but the times were no better. When I got the boost problem figured out, I got one run in after, but the ECT's were over 200*, so it ran a 13.5 and I went home. I'm going back soon with drag radials and I should get some much better numbers. I do run in full street trim. I need to try to lose some weight next time.

    2000 Regal GS | Twin-Charged T72 | HPT Pro + PLX Wideband | 12.55 @ 110 on 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!

    1998 5.9L Durango | Powerdyne supercharger @6psi | Mesa Headers | Gibson Cat-back | 1.7 RR's | Tuned PCM | Ported Heads | Custom TB & Intake | Custom fuel rails | Rebuild coming soon...