When running off the secondary VE, are the values in the AFR% in the scanner histogram accurate?
I know the secondary VE has a different resolution than the primary. However, it doesnt look like the histogram picks up on this. Meaning there will be values for 1200x25 when the secondary doesnt disply 1200x25 (rpm x map).
So i guess to clarify the question: when running off the secondary VE and logging AFR%, can i just copy the whole histogram table and "paste special" -> %-half on the secondary VE and have it come out correct? or will i have to copy each individual % and paste it to the appropriate cell?