Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 54

Thread: What seperates "good tuners from not so good?"

  1. #21
    hands down more time should be spent on driveability, and proper WOT operation is totally reliant on proper part throttle/low speed calibration. I agree with eric. i'm confident I could teach a monkey to tune WOT in an afternoon. but I've seen some pretty intelligent people struggle with even the most basic concepts of driveability for an obscene amount of time. one should always be wary of the 2 hour tooner. that said, yes. your cam isn't that crazy. it should drive almost like a Honda......

  2. #22
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,963
    Steck and Eric nailed it.... driveability is everything. Hell, we spend 99.9% of our time in cruise and at a stop light. If its shit there, its just plain shit, no two ways about it. I'm a freak when it comes to driveability, it has to be right and I will not stop until it is. That's why guys like Steck, Sound(S2H), Russ, 5litereater and EFI are freakin' awesome around here. Guys like them are worth their weight in bloody gold!
    When you get your program, read everything you can find on your platform and mods from those guys
    2000 Trans Am WS6

  3. #23
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    I'm not using DFCO with my cam....
    its not needed...
    he needs to revisit some of the tune to fix the bucking and surging...

    again... I have no issues driving my cam....
    seriously...drives like stock...with a big lope.
    -Scott -

  4. #24
    Tuner chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denver, NC
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by tommytuner View Post
    hands down more time should be spent on driveability, and proper WOT operation is totally reliant on proper part throttle/low speed calibration. I agree with eric. i'm confident I could teach a monkey to tune WOT in an afternoon. but I've seen some pretty intelligent people struggle with even the most basic concepts of driveability for an obscene amount of time. one should always be wary of the 2 hour tooner. that said, yes. your cam isn't that crazy. it should drive almost like a Honda......
    I would be psyched if it drove like a Honda. I chose this cam thinking it would a breeze to tune, if I knew I would have this much trouble I probably would have went more aggressive stick.

  5. #25
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    I would be psyched if it drove like a Honda. I chose this cam thinking it would a breeze to tune, if I knew I would have this much trouble I probably would have went more aggressive stick.
    I definitely would not want my car to drive like a honda....Slow, and idles at like 2500 rpm because none of those guys know how to tune..LOL
    -Scott -

  6. #26
    Tuner chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denver, NC
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by S2H View Post
    I'm not using DFCO with my cam....
    its not needed...
    he needs to revisit some of the tune to fix the bucking and surging...

    again... I have no issues driving my cam....
    seriously...drives like stock...with a big lope.
    Will DFCO cause the low rpm / light throttle bucking? Or have something to do with it?

  7. #27
    Senior Tuner
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,104
    90% of the customers that come to me have had a "tune" before and their gas mileage is crap, drives like hammered ass, bucks, stalls, but for some reason they seem to love the wot. imagine that. I spend more time on part throttle cals than anything else due to the fact your not in wot 100% of time you're driving the car. I understand how things work and can see why gm did things a certain way on various vehicles and can see where they need to be worked a bit for the individual and their driving styles. "it made 1200whp on the dyno" so? you can't come to a stop light without two footing it because it will die.

    The most hated, make the most power.
    93 Ranger. 5.3 D1X. 1069hp.

  8. #28
    Tuner chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denver, NC
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by Area47 View Post
    90% of the customers that come to me have had a "tune" before and their gas mileage is crap, drives like hammered ass, bucks, stalls, but for some reason they seem to love the wot. imagine that. I spend more time on part throttle cals than anything else due to the fact your not in wot 100% of time you're driving the car. I understand how things work and can see why gm did things a certain way on various vehicles and can see where they need to be worked a bit for the individual and their driving styles. "it made 1200whp on the dyno" so? you can't come to a stop light without two footing it because it will die.

    And this is where I am now. Crappy gas mileage, bucks and stalls! Got to love it. I would give up power in a minute to get this to run correctly. I love all of the threads that vendors claim about their GREAT DRIVABILITY cams. I understand everyone needs to make money and promote their business but at least be honest with yourselves and the customer for that matter. Lesson learned.

  9. #29
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    And this is where I am now. Crappy gas mileage, bucks and stalls! Got to love it. I would give up power in a minute to get this to run correctly. I love all of the threads that vendors claim about their GREAT DRIVABILITY cams. I understand everyone needs to make money and promote their business but at least be honest with yourselves and the customer for that matter. Lesson learned.
    What are your exact cam specs, also need to the LSA and the ICL.

    Russ Kemp

  10. #30
    Tuner chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denver, NC
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ K View Post
    What are your exact cam specs, also need to the LSA and the ICL.

    Russ Kemp
    Comp cam. 223/239 .625/.610 114 LSL lobes

  11. #31
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    Will DFCO cause the low rpm / light throttle bucking? Or have something to do with it?
    no...DFCO is only enabled at higher rpms as it comes down during Deceleration
    then it shuts off and fueling continues as normal once it gets below a specified value in the tune.


    Bucking/Surging is caused by several posibilities.
    Fuel
    Spark
    Idle Airflow
    Throttle follower
    Throttle Cracker
    -Scott -

  12. #32
    Tuner seevi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    southern California
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    NC
    Where in North Carolina?

  13. #33
    Tuner seevi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    southern California
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    Comp cam. 223/239 .625/.610 114 LSL lobes
    Is thus an EXR cam?

  14. #34
    Senior Tuner Russ K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Regina, Sask.
    Posts
    4,214
    Quote Originally Posted by chassis View Post
    Comp cam. 223/239 .625/.610 114 LSL lobes
    With only 3* overlap @.050, there shouldn't be very much light throttle/low RPM surge. Ask your tuner to delay the EOIT by 50* by adding .555 to the Normal Injection Target vs ECT. But with such a small cam, I don't think I will help much. Is the tune open or closed loop? Any DTC's?

    Russ Kemp

  15. #35
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Tucson, Az.
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by S2H View Post
    ALL of the 98+ ECU's are fast enough
    it can always be eliminated....

    this is what determines a good tuner vs a great tuner.


    knowing that there are other tables that can be tweaked and knowing which way to go with it to fix an issue is what makes the difference.
    once I learned the tricks, I never had a cam that I couldnt make stop bucking of surging...


    I drove a 252/274 cam in a 2001 Camaro with no issues

    it fired right up in less than 1/2 second of cranking
    it idled rock solid cold and hot
    I had no throttle hesitations
    I had no problems with bucking/Surging
    it returned to idle smooth and without stalling.

    if it werent for having to change valve springs every 5000 miles and for not having a heater or AC in this particular car, I would probably have daily drove it.

    Scott,

    I have been told by several "famous" tuners that my 245/255 113 LSA cam in my manual 2005 C6 (E40) cannot be completely tamed for the street. I would happily forward my tune and whatever logs you want with a header installed wide band for you to eliminate surging under various conditions as high as 2500 rpm.

  16. #36
    Tuner chassis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denver, NC
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by Russ K View Post
    With only 3* overlap @.050, there shouldn't be very much light throttle/low RPM surge. Ask your tuner to delay the EOIT by 50* by adding .555 to the Normal Injection Target vs ECT. But with such a small cam, I don't think I will help much. Is the tune open or closed loop? Any DTC's?

    Russ Kemp
    The issue I have now with my tuner or (past tuner) is he claims this is how they do things and everything seems completely normal to him. To put in perspective he also told me that my driving style is why it stalls all the time.... Said I need to push in the clutch around 1500 rpm when coming to a stop. I drove race cars for 24 years and can adapt to most anything. This tune is not right bottom line. I'm a slight perfectionist so settling for an average driving car is not going to work for me. So I'm waiting for my HP Tune to come in the mail. This ought to be fun. To answer your question about DTC, I will have more info once I get the program up and running. Looking forward to getting good advise, as I'm sure I will need it.

  17. #37
    when you get your Hptuners, make sure the dfco timing and Cfco timing have been edited.... normally put them around 15-30 degrees depending on the setup.... on some os's the timing can actually go negative, and with a cam the minute you put the clutch in the motor will stall.
    Owner of Cunningham Motorsports

    06 z06
    2016 camaro
    68 Camaro
    2014 e63 amg
    07 LBZ Duramax

  18. #38
    Senior Tuner LSxpwrdZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    on the Dyno
    Posts
    1,825
    Quote Originally Posted by jim2092 View Post
    Scott,

    I have been told by several "famous" tuners that my 245/255 113 LSA cam in my manual 2005 C6 (E40) cannot be completely tamed for the street. I would happily forward my tune and whatever logs you want with a header installed wide band for you to eliminate surging under various conditions as high as 2500 rpm.
    That setup shouldn't have any surging around 2500rpm... especially on an E40.

    The only setups that have a few quirks IMO are big stalled auto cars with junk throttle bodies (mechanical TB w/ IAC). Those setups will have you chasing your tail. I get in a lot of TREX cam'd LS1's that come in previously "tooned" and honestly they were hard to back up onto the dyno without flashing a basemap to them. They normally leave out of here cruising in 6th gear at 40mph 1100-1200rpm with no bucking.

    Now you will get some ringers every once in a while that are just awnry. Most of them I notice have erratic RPM signals and I think that contributes alot to some idle issues and surging at low load and engine speeds. Cause? Sloppy timing chain, resonance at a certain rpm, heck I don't know but digging in and tweaking various tables can definitely minimize the issues.
    James Short - [email protected]
    Located in Central Kentucky
    ShorTuning
    2020 Camaro 2SS | BTR 230 | GPI CNC Heads | MSD Intake | Rotofab | 2" LT's | Flex Fuel | 638rwhp / 540rwtq
    2002 Camaro | LSX 427 | CID LS7's | Twin GT5088's | Haltech Nexus R5 | RPM TH400

  19. #39
    Tuner
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Tucson, Az.
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by LSxpwrdZ View Post
    That setup shouldn't have any surging around 2500rpm... especially on an E40.

    The only setups that have a few quirks IMO are big stalled auto cars with junk throttle bodies (mechanical TB w/ IAC). Those setups will have you chasing your tail. I get in a lot of TREX cam'd LS1's that come in previously "tooned" and honestly they were hard to back up onto the dyno without flashing a basemap to them. They normally leave out of here cruising in 6th gear at 40mph 1100-1200rpm with no bucking.

    Now you will get some ringers every once in a while that are just awnry. Most of them I notice have erratic RPM signals and I think that contributes alot to some idle issues and surging at low load and engine speeds. Cause? Sloppy timing chain, resonance at a certain rpm, heck I don't know but digging in and tweaking various tables can definitely minimize the issues.
    A new GM LS2 HD timing chain went in with the cam. But if you want to solidify your status as a super tuner, I shall happily send you the tune and whatever logs you desire.

  20. #40
    Senior Tuner S2H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Schexnayder Racing - Arnaudville LA
    Posts
    4,387
    when you have issues with a tune, you should always post it...
    post the actual file you are using and we can take a look at it.

    if you have some logs of it happening, that would be useful also..
    we may ask you to data log it with other PID's in the table as well once we see what is happening.
    -Scott -